11.08.2013 23:10, Tom Wijsman пишет:
There is a mismatch between the people listed on the project page [1]
and on the e-mail alias; the former lists 3 people, the latter 8. There
surely is some inconsistency here; so, who is actually part of the
team and who is just following along the mail
Dear all,
I have made a GLEP draft to standardize our recent effort on using our
own libc from portage inside Prefix.
At present only glibc on linux is supported. While the idea is quite
extensible to other kernel/libc combo. I've got no reply from GLEP team
for 3 weeks. Here I post the draft
On Mon, 12 Aug 2013 10:53:16 +0400
Sergey Popov pinkb...@gentoo.org wrote:
11.08.2013 23:10, Tom Wijsman пишет:
There is a mismatch between the people listed on the project page
[1] and on the e-mail alias; the former lists 3 people, the latter
8. There surely is some inconsistency here;
There should not be a collision of the dropin.cache in the first place.
By adding the cache files to COLLISION_IGNORE it will just hide the
collision problem and create other one (with obsolette caches), harder
to debug.
On Sat, 10 Aug 2013 11:19:59 +0200
Michał Górny mgo...@gentoo.org wrote:
heroxbd posted on Mon, 12 Aug 2013 16:45:56 +0900 as excerpted:
I have made a GLEP draft to standardize our recent effort on using our
own libc from portage inside Prefix.
At present only glibc on linux is supported.
The rst text are included inline.
Hi. I know nothing about prefix so
No. It will make the migration to owned caches simpler while keeping
track of them.
By adding the cache files to COLLISION_IGNORE it will just hide the
collision problem and create other one (with obsolette caches), harder
to debug.
Yep, that's why I have submitted a patch to portage that
I don't see any reason to keep this masked other than bug #416069, which
needs to be fixed anyways. How does Friday sound?
https://bugs.gentoo.org/416069 xorg-2.eclass: add --disable-selective-werror
to configure
https://bugs.gentoo.org/461954 GCC 4.8 porting
--
Ryan Hill
On 13/08/13 03:14, Alexis Ballier (aballier) wrote:
aballier13/08/13 00:14:02
Modified: ChangeLog package.mask
Log:
unmask libcaca/toilet, relevant bugs seem fixed here
Revision ChangesPath
1.8151 profiles/ChangeLog
file :
On 08:00 Thu 08 Aug , Patrick Lauer wrote:
On 08/08/2013 04:47 AM, hasufell wrote:
I'd say let's push for it. I am willing to do a lot of testing.
Good plan. I hope I find some time to figure out a roadmap so we have
an idea what needs to be done - or someone else might just want to
On 13/08/13 03:41, Ryan Hill wrote:
I don't see any reason to keep this masked other than bug #416069, which
needs to be fixed anyways. How does Friday sound?
https://bugs.gentoo.org/416069 xorg-2.eclass: add --disable-selective-werror
to configure
https://bugs.gentoo.org/461954 GCC 4.8
Dear Fellows,
Canonical is raising money by pushing their concept of Ubuntu for
Android[1][2]. The idea is to put GNU environment (esp. Ubuntu userland)
in parallel to Android to drive the external HDMI output with X11
protocal, so that desktop applications can run on the smartphone.
The idea is
11 matches
Mail list logo
