On Fri, 2014-01-24 at 04:04 +0100, Tom Wijsman wrote:
> On Thu, 23 Jan 2014 18:04:19 -0600
> Steev Klimaszewski wrote:
>
> > Your "suggestion" was expanding the "arm" keyword to "armv4-linux",
> > "armv5-linux", "armv6-linux", "armv6-hardfloat-linux",
> > "armv7-softfp-linux", "armv7-hardfloat-li
On Thu, 23 Jan 2014 18:04:19 -0600
Steev Klimaszewski wrote:
> Your "suggestion" was expanding the "arm" keyword to "armv4-linux",
> "armv5-linux", "armv6-linux", "armv6-hardfloat-linux",
> "armv7-softfp-linux", "armv7-hardfloat-linux",
> "armv7-hardfloat-uclibc-linux" - that is nowhere near a go
On Fri, 2014-01-24 at 00:50 +0100, Tom Wijsman wrote:
> On Thu, 23 Jan 2014 23:42:28 +0100
> Peter Stuge wrote:
>
> > Tom Wijsman wrote:
> > > you shoot down solutions
> >
> > Maybe it wasn't a very good solution that deserved to be shot down.
>
> Maybe it was; what is needed here, is the feedb
On Thu, 23 Jan 2014 23:42:28 +0100
Peter Stuge wrote:
> Tom Wijsman wrote:
> > you shoot down solutions
>
> Maybe it wasn't a very good solution that deserved to be shot down.
Maybe it was; what is needed here, is the feedback that makes it better.
Work towards a very good solution deserves mo
Tom Wijsman wrote:
> you shoot down solutions
Maybe it wasn't a very good solution that deserved to be shot down.
//Peter
pgpWdBSgiDfHp.pgp
Description: PGP signature
On Thu, 23 Jan 2014 14:55:34 -0600
Steev Klimaszewski wrote:
> On Thu, 2014-01-23 at 20:13 +0100, Tom Wijsman wrote:
> The complaint is slow to stable arches
Yes.
> by specifying "-* arch" it would signify that ONLY that arch uses
> that version of the ebuild - and it would be up to the arch te
On Thu, 2014-01-23 at 20:13 +0100, Tom Wijsman wrote:
> > I don't think that's what was being proposed, though. The question was
> > really the old complaint about slow architectures; the "-* arch"
> > solution sounds like the most reasonable definition of "dropping"
> > keywords, in the absence of
On Thu, 23 Jan 2014 18:12:42 +
"Steven J. Long" wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 20, 2014, Tom Wijsman wrote:
> > On Sun, 19 Jan 2014, Christopher Head wrote:
> > > If stable really is falling behind and the backlog is always
> > > growing, obviously something has to be done. I just don't want
> > > "som
On Mon, Jan 20, 2014, Tom Wijsman wrote:
> On Sun, 19 Jan 2014, Christopher Head wrote:
> > If stable really is falling behind and the backlog is always growing,
> > obviously something has to be done. I just don't want "something" to
> > mean "don't have a stable tree". The stable tree provides me
Dnia 2014-01-23, o godz. 11:36:06
Chris Reffett napisał(a):
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On 01/23/2014 11:28 AM, Michał Górny wrote:
> > Dnia 2014-01-23, o godz. 11:24:41 Chris Reffett
> > napisał(a):
> >
> >> After some discussion on good ways to communicate optional
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 01/23/2014 11:28 AM, Michał Górny wrote:
> Dnia 2014-01-23, o godz. 11:24:41 Chris Reffett
> napisał(a):
>
>> After some discussion on good ways to communicate optional
>> dependencies to users, I was shown the optfeature() function in
>> net-mi
Dnia 2014-01-23, o godz. 11:24:41
Chris Reffett napisał(a):
> After some discussion on good ways to communicate optional
> dependencies to users, I was shown the optfeature() function in
> net-misc/netctl. Gentoo contributor Andrew Hamilton and I came up with
> a cleaned up and expanded version o
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hello all,
After some discussion on good ways to communicate optional
dependencies to users, I was shown the optfeature() function in
net-misc/netctl. Gentoo contributor Andrew Hamilton and I came up with
a cleaned up and expanded version of it, and I
13 matches
Mail list logo
