[gentoo-dev] Re: dropping redundant stable keywords

2014-02-06 Thread Duncan
William Hubbs posted on Thu, 06 Feb 2014 12:26:08 -0600 as excerpted: > [1] https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.dgi?id=487332 s/dgi/cgi/ Try this one: https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=487332 -- Duncan - List replies preferred. No HTML msgs. "Every nonfree program has a lord, a master --

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Re: dropping redundant stable keywords

2014-02-06 Thread William Hubbs
On Thu, Feb 06, 2014 at 01:48:38AM +0100, Tom Wijsman wrote: > On Wed, 05 Feb 2014 17:05:08 -0500 > "Rick \"Zero_Chaos\" Farina" wrote: > > > > > > > Yes, making the newest versions never available because the old > > > versions sink all your time really stops progress to a dead halt. > > > > >

Re: [gentoo-dev] New global USE flag called "qrcode" for QR code support

2014-02-06 Thread Ian Stakenvicius
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 On 06/02/14 05:26 AM, Peter Stuge wrote: > Samuli Suominen wrote: >> New global USE flag 'qrcode' for the >> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/QR_code (sorry, page didn't load for >> me so I hope it's okay) I propose 'Enable support for 2D QR >> Codes' ?

[gentoo-dev] Re: dropping redundant stable keywords

2014-02-06 Thread Duncan
Tom Wijsman posted on Thu, 06 Feb 2014 11:10:53 +0100 as excerpted: > On Wed, 5 Feb 2014 13:07:48 + (UTC) > Duncan <1i5t5.dun...@cox.net> wrote: > >> Tom Wijsman posted on Wed, 05 Feb 2014 13:58:22 +0100 as excerpted: >> >> > Can we do something about our growing queue when fixing is >> > in

Re: [gentoo-dev] Packages up for grabs

2014-02-06 Thread Bernard Cafarelli
Le 05/02/2014 16:43, Michael Palimaka a écrit : These packages are not used by anyone in the KDE herd, and they are not KDE-related, so they are now up for grabs. There are a few bugs open, but nothing major. net-misc/csync net-misc/mirall I can take these, as I already maintain owncloud itsel

Re: [gentoo-dev] [OT] Re: dropping redundant stable keywords

2014-02-06 Thread Peter Stuge
Tom Wijsman wrote: > > > Fwiw, the very same person I made that single one-word "Why?" to > > > has previously appreciated that I asked him. > > > > You can not extrapolate from that, and can certainly not assume that > > I will appreciate that you ask "Why?" in response to something I > > express

Re: [gentoo-dev] New global USE flag called "qrcode" for QR code support

2014-02-06 Thread Peter Stuge
Samuli Suominen wrote: > New global USE flag 'qrcode' for the http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/QR_code > (sorry, page didn't load for me so I hope it's okay) > I propose 'Enable support for 2D QR Codes' ? .. > And app-office/glabels has USE="barcode" but it also pulls in > app-text/barcode, so likely i

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: dropping redundant stable keywords

2014-02-06 Thread Tom Wijsman
On Wed, 5 Feb 2014 13:07:48 + (UTC) Duncan <1i5t5.dun...@cox.net> wrote: > Tom Wijsman posted on Wed, 05 Feb 2014 13:58:22 +0100 as excerpted: > > > Can we do something about our growing queue when fixing is > > insufficient? > > > > https://bugs.gentoo.org/chart.cgi?category=-All-&datefrom=

Re: [gentoo-dev] [OT] Re: dropping redundant stable keywords

2014-02-06 Thread Tom Wijsman
On Thu, 6 Feb 2014 09:47:37 +0100 Peter Stuge wrote: > Please stop writing so many and so long emails. > > Tom Wijsman wrote: > > Fwiw, the very same person I made that single one-word "Why?" to > > has previously appreciated that I asked him. > > You can not extrapolate from that, and can cert

[gentoo-dev] New global USE flag called "qrcode" for QR code support

2014-02-06 Thread Samuli Suominen
New global USE flag 'qrcode' for the http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/QR_code (sorry, page didn't load for me so I hope it's okay) I propose 'Enable support for 2D QR Codes' ? app-office/glabels-3.0.1:barcode app-office/glabels-3.0.1-r1:barcode app-office/glabels-3.2.0:barcode media-gfx/qrencode-pyth

Re: [gentoo-dev] [OT] Re: dropping redundant stable keywords

2014-02-06 Thread Peter Stuge
Please stop writing so many and so long emails. Tom Wijsman wrote: > Fwiw, the very same person I made that single one-word "Why?" to > has previously appreciated that I asked him. You can not extrapolate from that, and can certainly not assume that I will appreciate that you ask "Why?" in respon