Re: [gentoo-dev] Stable masks on multilib packages

2014-03-31 Thread Michał Górny
Dnia 2014-03-31, o godz. 19:09:44 "Anthony G. Basile" napisał(a): > On 03/31/2014 06:16 PM, Michał Górny wrote: > > That said, I have an alternate idea inspired by the ppc breakage. I'm > > thinking of replacing the amd64 abi_x86_32 mask with a global stable > > mask of all abi_*_* flags on the r

Re: [gentoo-dev] New virtuals for libudev and libgudev

2014-03-31 Thread Samuli Suominen
On 31/03/14 23:35, Rick "Zero_Chaos" Farina wrote: > > https://wiki.gentoo.org/wiki/GLEP:48 > > "In the event that a developer still insists that a package does not > break QA standards, an appeal can be made at the next council meeting. > The package should be dealt with per QA's request until su

Re: [gentoo-dev] Stable masks on multilib packages

2014-03-31 Thread Ben de Groot
On 1 April 2014 06:16, Michał Górny wrote: > Hello, all. > > The late multilib ppc issues made me re-check our stable masks on > abi_x86_* flags and, honestly, I'm not sure if we're doing things > the right way. > > That said, I have an alternate idea inspired by the ppc breakage. > > Your thought

Re: [gentoo-dev] sandbox access violations while running matlab binary installer

2014-03-31 Thread Michael Orlitzky
On 03/31/2014 02:14 PM, Samuli Suominen wrote: > > On 31/03/14 21:15, Kfir Lavi wrote: >> Hi all, >> I'm trying to create an ebuild to install matlab MCR on gentoo. >> The installer InstallShileld try to create directory >> /root/InstallShield ;-) >> mkdir is run by java binary that try this. So I

Re: [gentoo-dev] Stable masks on multilib packages

2014-03-31 Thread Anthony G. Basile
On 03/31/2014 06:16 PM, Michał Górny wrote: Hello, all. The late multilib ppc issues made me re-check our stable masks on abi_x86_* flags and, honestly, I'm not sure if we're doing things the right way. First, a quick summary. Let's consider dev-libs/elfutils that has a dependency on app-arch/

[gentoo-dev] Stable masks on multilib packages

2014-03-31 Thread Michał Górny
Hello, all. The late multilib ppc issues made me re-check our stable masks on abi_x86_* flags and, honestly, I'm not sure if we're doing things the right way. First, a quick summary. Let's consider dev-libs/elfutils that has a dependency on app-arch/bzip2. If we're building 32-bit elfutils, it n

[gentoo-dev] Re: sandbox access violations while running matlab binary installer

2014-03-31 Thread Duncan
Alexandre Rostovtsev posted on Mon, 31 Mar 2014 14:54:09 -0400 as excerpted: > The best solution is to figure out why the directory is being created > there and whether it is customizable. Maybe the code actually is > creating $HOME/InstallShield? Then export HOME=${T} in your ebuild. Well, "best

Re: [gentoo-dev] New virtuals for libudev and libgudev

2014-03-31 Thread Rick "Zero_Chaos" Farina
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 03/31/2014 01:50 AM, Samuli Suominen wrote: > > On 30/03/14 23:45, Rick "Zero_Chaos" Farina wrote: >> >> Your input will be considered here with all the weight it deserves. My >> mask was to force this discussion on the list and it has done it's j

Re: [gentoo-dev] sandbox access violations while running matlab binary installer

2014-03-31 Thread Samuli Suominen
On 31/03/14 21:24, Kfir Lavi wrote: > > > > On Mon, Mar 31, 2014 at 9:14 PM, Samuli Suominen > wrote: > > > On 31/03/14 21:15, Kfir Lavi wrote: > > Hi all, > > I'm trying to create an ebuild to install matlab MCR on gentoo. > > The installer InstallShi

[gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-commits] gentoo-x86 commit in app-admin/monit: monit-5.7-r1.ebuild ChangeLog

2014-03-31 Thread Pacho Ramos
El lun, 31-03-2014 a las 08:59 +0200, Ulrich Mueller escribió: > > On Sun, 30 Mar 2014, Pacho Ramos wrote: > > > Index: monit-5.7-r1.ebuild > > === > > # Copyright 1999-2014 Gentoo Foundation > > # Distributed under the terms of t

Re: [gentoo-dev] sandbox access violations while running matlab binary installer

2014-03-31 Thread Mike Gilbert
On Mon, Mar 31, 2014 at 2:54 PM, Alexandre Rostovtsev wrote: > The best solution is to figure out why the directory is being created there > and whether it is customizable. Maybe the code actually is creating > $HOME/InstallShield? Then export HOME=${T} in your ebuild. > Portage already sets HOME

[gentoo-dev] mobile-phone herd is empty

2014-03-31 Thread Tom Wijsman
Hello For at least 2 months and 3 weeks, the mobile-phone herd has been empty; a few months ago (Oct 2013), a request for help[2] was sent. If nobody joins to it, we will proceed with dissolving the herd in a week or so. Thanks. [1]: gentoo/xml/htdocs/proj/en/metastructure/herds/herds.xml log

Re: [gentoo-dev] sandbox access violations while running matlab binary installer

2014-03-31 Thread Alexandre Rostovtsev
The best solution is to figure out why the directory is being created there and whether it is customizable. Maybe the code actually is creating $HOME/InstallShield? Then export HOME=${T} in your ebuild. On March 31, 2014 2:24:24 PM EDT, Kfir Lavi wrote: >On Mon, Mar 31, 2014 at 9:14 PM, Samuli

Re: [gentoo-dev] sandbox access violations while running matlab binary installer

2014-03-31 Thread Kfir Lavi
On Mon, Mar 31, 2014 at 9:14 PM, Samuli Suominen wrote: > > On 31/03/14 21:15, Kfir Lavi wrote: > > Hi all, > > I'm trying to create an ebuild to install matlab MCR on gentoo. > > The installer InstallShileld try to create directory > > /root/InstallShield ;-) > > mkdir is run by java binary that

Re: [gentoo-dev] sandbox access violations while running matlab binary installer

2014-03-31 Thread Samuli Suominen
On 31/03/14 21:15, Kfir Lavi wrote: > Hi all, > I'm trying to create an ebuild to install matlab MCR on gentoo. > The installer InstallShileld try to create directory > /root/InstallShield ;-) > mkdir is run by java binary that try this. So I have no access to > change it. > There is no option to

[gentoo-dev] sandbox access violations while running matlab binary installer

2014-03-31 Thread Kfir Lavi
Hi all, I'm trying to create an ebuild to install matlab MCR on gentoo. The installer InstallShileld try to create directory /root/InstallShield ;-) mkdir is run by java binary that try this. So I have no access to change it. There is no option to provide InstallShield it's relative install path. I

Re: [gentoo-dev] Why is IUSE=hpn mandatory in openssh ?

2014-03-31 Thread Toralf Förster
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 On 03/31/2014 01:15 PM, Alex Xu wrote: > On 31/03/14 03:36 AM, Dirkjan Ochtman wrote: >> So, I'm interested... How widely used is the HPN patch set? Are there >> any good indications that it doesn't negatively impact security? > > https://bugs.debia

[gentoo-dev] New category: kde-frameworks

2014-03-31 Thread Michael Palimaka
Hi, With the tentative release date of KDE Frameworks looming, we would like to propose the new category 'kde-frameworks'. The category would initially contain approximately 60 new packages, with the potential for more in the future. KDE Frameworks is being released independently of other compon

Re: [gentoo-dev] Why is IUSE=hpn mandatory in openssh ?

2014-03-31 Thread Alex Xu
On 31/03/14 03:36 AM, Dirkjan Ochtman wrote: > So, I'm interested... How widely used is the HPN patch set? Are there > any good indications that it doesn't negatively impact security? https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=292932 https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=693424

Re: [gentoo-dev] Why is IUSE=hpn mandatory in openssh ?

2014-03-31 Thread Dirkjan Ochtman
On Sat, Mar 29, 2014 at 11:31 PM, hasufell wrote: > We have had those debates whether the "+" should follow upstream > decisions and such. Short answer: the maintainer decides. There is no > consistency for this and there will never be. That may be true, I still think it behooves us to be particu

[gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-commits] gentoo-x86 commit in app-admin/monit: monit-5.7-r1.ebuild ChangeLog

2014-03-31 Thread Ulrich Mueller
> On Sun, 30 Mar 2014, Pacho Ramos wrote: > Index: monit-5.7-r1.ebuild > === > # Copyright 1999-2014 Gentoo Foundation > # Distributed under the terms of the GNU General Public License v2 > # $Header: /var/cvsroot/gentoo-x86/app-a