[gentoo-dev] Packages up for grabs / looking for new primary maintainers

2014-04-20 Thread Ben de Groot
As my time is limited, and certain issues also drain my motivation, I am stepping down as primary maintainer for the following packages. They are also assigned to a herd, but since these are relatively high maintenance they need a dedicated maintainer. (And fonts herd has been basically inactive

Re: [gentoo-dev] Packages up for grabs / looking for new primary maintainers

2014-04-20 Thread Lars Wendler
On Sun, 20 Apr 2014 17:09:00 +0800 Ben de Groot wrote: media-libs/fontconfig x11-libs/cairo I'd be interested in these but I might not give them the attention they deserve. -- Lars Wendler Gentoo package maintainer GPG: 4DD8 C47C CDFA 5295 E1A6 3FC8 F696 74AB 981C A6FC signature.asc

[gentoo-dev] Python 2.6 to be masked on 2014-04-28

2014-04-20 Thread Michał Górny
Developers and users, On behalf of Python team, I would like to announce that we are planning on starting the process of removing Python 2.6. The process will start with masking the python2_6 target USE flags and relevant packages. If nobody strongly disagrees with this, we will commit the masks

Re: [gentoo-dev] Packages up for grabs / looking for new primary maintainers

2014-04-20 Thread Alexandre Rostovtsev
On Sun, 2014-04-20 at 17:09 +0800, Ben de Groot wrote: x11-libs/cairo I will take this. signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part

Re: [gentoo-dev] Packages up for grabs / looking for new primary maintainers

2014-04-20 Thread Ian Stakenvicius
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 On 20/04/14 05:09 AM, Ben de Groot wrote: app-text/calibre I can take this one. media-libs/fontconfig media-libs/freetype I can probably take these too, but if someone else wants to and has more experience with these (since i don't) then by all

[gentoo-dev] Automated Package Removal and Addition Tracker, for the week ending 2014-04-20 23h59 UTC

2014-04-20 Thread Robin H. Johnson
The attached list notes all of the packages that were added or removed from the tree, for the week ending 2014-04-20 23h59 UTC. Removals: net-ftp/pftpfxp 2014-04-14 06:03:12 ulm kde-misc/youtube-servicemenu2014-04-15 08:30:09 johu

[gentoo-dev] LTO use in the tree

2014-04-20 Thread Ryan Hill
Hey all, As more and more packages are starting to add LTO flags automatically through their build systems, I thought I'd point out a couple things: - LTO utterly destroys debug info. Flags like -g are incompatible with LTO. - LTO causes .GCC.command.line sections to be discarded, which means

[gentoo-dev] Re: LTO use in the tree

2014-04-20 Thread Ryan Hill
On Sun, 20 Apr 2014 21:14:51 -0600 Ryan Hill rh...@gentoo.org wrote: Hey all, As more and more packages are starting to add LTO flags automatically through their build systems, I thought I'd point out a couple things: - LTO utterly destroys debug info. Flags like -g are incompatible with