> On Fri, 1 Aug 2014, Martin Vaeth wrote:
> Ulrich Mueller wrote:
>>> On Sat, 26 Jul 2014, Martin Vaeth wrote:
>>
>>> Quite the opposite, PMS claims that one cannot rely on
>>> anything stored in /var/db
>>
>> Where does it say so?
> "Appendix B: Unspecified Items
> The following item
On Fri, Aug 01, 2014 at 09:37:10AM -0400, Anthony G. Basile wrote:
> Hi everyone,
>
> I'm email gentoo-dev@ because I'm trying to hit up as many devs as
> possible. Hopefully you've seen the recent discussions about what to do
> with ppc/ppc64 given the low manpower. Let's get interested peopl
Ulrich Mueller wrote:
>> On Sat, 26 Jul 2014, Martin Vaeth wrote:
>
>> Quite the opposite, PMS claims that one cannot rely on
>> anything stored in /var/db
>
> Where does it say so?
"Appendix B: Unspecified Items
The following items are not specified by this document,
and must not be relied
Steven J. Long wrote:
>>
>> > It will probably also cause confusion for comaintainers and
>> > collaborators, especially when INSTALL_VERSION points to a version
>> > that has already been removed.
>
> So use another name that can't be confused.
Perhaps there is a misunderstanding: I did not unde
On Fri, Aug 01, 2014 at 10:36AM, Ian Stakenvicius wrote:
> On 01/08/14 05:05 AM, Steven J. Long wrote:
> > I don't know why we can't just mask cross-*/whatever in the
> > multilib profile, instead of more talk of "masking crossdev" with a
> > heavy heart.
> >
> > Nor do know if that's been done al
On Fri, Aug 01, 2014 at 10:13:33AM +0100, Steven J. Long wrote:
> On Sun, Jun 29, 2014 at 11:01:53PM -0500, William Hubbs wrote:
> > On Sun, Jun 29, 2014 at 10:04:54AM -0400, Rich Freeman wrote:
> > > A package that hasn't been tested AT ALL doesn't belong in ~arch.
> > > Suppose the maintainer is
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 01/08/14 05:05 AM, Steven J. Long wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 20, 2014, Ian Stakenvicius wrote:
>> On 19/06/14 05:20 PM, Steven J. Long wrote:
>>> Well I've spent far too long at crossdev code, only to see this
>>> and realise you can simply hard-mask:
Hi everyone,
I'm email gentoo-dev@ because I'm trying to hit up as many devs as
possible. Hopefully you've seen the recent discussions about what to do
with ppc/ppc64 given the low manpower. Let's get interested people
meeting in #gentoo-powerpc on Monday Aug 4, 2014 @20:00 UTC. If there
ar
Raúl Porcel posted on Fri, 01 Aug 2014 10:52:21 +0200 as excerpted:
> But almost all arches except amd64/x86/arm are getting less and less
> popular:
>
> alpha: no new hardware in more than 8+ years
> hppa: being phased out IIRC, and no new workstations
> (ie, graphics/sound) in 5+ years
> ia64:
On 08/01/2014 04:52, Raúl Porcel wrote:
> On 07/26/14 19:33, Michael Palimaka wrote:
>> On 07/27/2014 03:19 AM, William Hubbs wrote:
>>> If an arch team isn't going to honor a stable request, shouldn't they
>>> remove themselves from it and say so?
>>>
>>> Also, if an arch team does that, does that
On Mon, Jul 28, 2014 at 05:49:07AM +, Martin Vaeth wrote:
> hasufell wrote:
> > Ulrich Mueller:
> >>
> >> I wonder if it wouldn't be saner to leave our revision syntax
> >> untouched.
>
> As already mentioned, -r1.1 is only one of several possible ways
> how to achieve the same aim; I am not
On 07/26/14 19:33, Michael Palimaka wrote:
> On 07/27/2014 03:19 AM, William Hubbs wrote:
>> If an arch team isn't going to honor a stable request, shouldn't they
>> remove themselves from it and say so?
>>
>> Also, if an arch team does that, does that mean we don't have to file
>> stable requests
On Sun, Jun 29, 2014 at 11:01:53PM -0500, William Hubbs wrote:
> On Sun, Jun 29, 2014 at 10:04:54AM -0400, Rich Freeman wrote:
> > A package that hasn't been tested AT ALL doesn't belong in ~arch.
> > Suppose the maintainer is unable to test some aspect of the package,
> > or any aspect of the pack
On Fri, Jun 20, 2014, Ian Stakenvicius wrote:
> On 19/06/14 05:20 PM, Steven J. Long wrote:
> > Well I've spent far too long at crossdev code, only to see this and
> > realise you can simply hard-mask:
> > cross-i686-pc-linux-gnu/{binutils,gcc,glibc,pkg-config} in the
> > amd64 multilib profile, u
14 matches
Mail list logo
