-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 01/07/2015 04:19 PM, Jonathan Callen wrote:
> On 01/07/2015 12:15 PM, Matt Turner wrote:
>> On Wed, Jan 7, 2015 at 7:57 AM, William Hubbs
>> wrote:
>>> On Wed, Jan 07, 2015 at 06:49:56AM -0500, Philip Webb wrote:
150106 William Hubbs wrote: T
On Thu, Jan 08, 2015 at 04:26:02AM +0300, Andrew Savchenko wrote:
> On Tue, 6 Jan 2015 17:47:10 -0600 William Hubbs wrote:
> > All,
> >
> > these packages have been masked in the tree for months - years with no
> > signs of fixes.
>
> Some of them are binary packages or have no fixes upstream. If
Hi,
On Wed, 07 Jan 2015 15:06:08 +0100 Pacho Ramos wrote:
> El lun, 01-12-2014 a las 12:00 +0100, Pacho Ramos escribió:
[...]
> > I will probably remove it in a week or so as looks like nobody added to
> > it :/
>
> Done, this packages are now up for grabs:
> net-proxy/pingtunnel
> net-proxy/pol
On Tue, 6 Jan 2015 17:47:10 -0600 William Hubbs wrote:
> All,
>
> these packages have been masked in the tree for months - years with no
> signs of fixes.
Some of them are binary packages or have no fixes upstream. If
there are no alternatives in tree for a package, and it works fine
(despite som
On Wed, 7 Jan 2015 12:11:04 -0600 William Hubbs wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 07, 2015 at 12:24:12PM -0500, Mike Pagano wrote:
> > On Wed, Jan 07, 2015 at 12:14:23PM -0500, Mike Gilbert wrote:
> > > If you remove the mask, users will no longer be warned that they are
> > > using a flawed copy of the kernel
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
On 01/07/2015 12:15 PM, Matt Turner wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 7, 2015 at 7:57 AM, William Hubbs
> wrote:
>> On Wed, Jan 07, 2015 at 06:49:56AM -0500, Philip Webb wrote:
>>> 150106 William Hubbs wrote: This one is perfectly safe on a
>>> single-user syste
On Wed, Jan 07, 2015 at 04:33:19PM -0600, William Hubbs wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 07, 2015 at 02:48:01PM -0500, Mike Pagano wrote:
> > On Wed, Jan 07, 2015 at 01:08:21PM -0600, William Hubbs wrote:
> > > On Wed, Jan 07, 2015 at 01:29:15PM -0500, Mike Pagano wrote:
> > > > On Wed, Jan 07, 2015 at 11:11:3
On Wed, Jan 07, 2015 at 02:48:01PM -0500, Mike Pagano wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 07, 2015 at 01:08:21PM -0600, William Hubbs wrote:
> > On Wed, Jan 07, 2015 at 01:29:15PM -0500, Mike Pagano wrote:
> > > On Wed, Jan 07, 2015 at 11:11:32AM -0600, William Hubbs wrote:
> > > > On Wed, Jan 07, 2015 at 11:21:5
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
On 01/07/2015 07:48 PM, Kristian Fiskerstrand wrote:
> On 01/07/2015 07:22 PM, Mike Gilbert wrote:
>> On Wed, Jan 7, 2015 at 1:11 PM, William Hubbs
>> wrote:
...
>
>
> My two cents is that this is particularly true for kernel sources.
> For othe
On Wed, Jan 07, 2015 at 01:08:21PM -0600, William Hubbs wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 07, 2015 at 01:29:15PM -0500, Mike Pagano wrote:
> > On Wed, Jan 07, 2015 at 11:11:32AM -0600, William Hubbs wrote:
> > > On Wed, Jan 07, 2015 at 11:21:56AM -0500, Mike Pagano wrote:
> > > > On Tue, Jan 06, 2015 at 05:47:1
07.01.2015 22:00, Mart Raudsepp пишет:
> On K, 2015-01-07 at 07:29 +0100, Peter Stuge wrote:
>> $ grep :harfbuzz profiles/use*desc
>> profiles/use.local.desc:dev-libs/efl:harfbuzz - Enable complex text shaping
>> and layout support.
>> profiles/use.local.desc:dev-qt/qtgui:harfbuzz - Use media-lib
On Wed, Jan 07, 2015 at 01:29:15PM -0500, Mike Pagano wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 07, 2015 at 11:11:32AM -0600, William Hubbs wrote:
> > On Wed, Jan 07, 2015 at 11:21:56AM -0500, Mike Pagano wrote:
> > > On Tue, Jan 06, 2015 at 05:47:10PM -0600, William Hubbs wrote:
> > > > All,
> > > > #
> > > > # Pinkie
On K, 2015-01-07 at 07:29 +0100, Peter Stuge wrote:
> $ grep :harfbuzz profiles/use*desc
> profiles/use.local.desc:dev-libs/efl:harfbuzz - Enable complex text shaping
> and layout support.
> profiles/use.local.desc:dev-qt/qtgui:harfbuzz - Use media-libs/harfbuzz for
> text shaping (experimental i
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
On 01/07/2015 07:22 PM, Mike Gilbert wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 7, 2015 at 1:11 PM, William Hubbs
> wrote:
>> On Wed, Jan 07, 2015 at 12:24:12PM -0500, Mike Pagano wrote:
>>> On Wed, Jan 07, 2015 at 12:14:23PM -0500, Mike Gilbert wrote:
On Wed, Jan 7
On Wed, Jan 07, 2015 at 11:11:32AM -0600, William Hubbs wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 07, 2015 at 11:21:56AM -0500, Mike Pagano wrote:
> > On Tue, Jan 06, 2015 at 05:47:10PM -0600, William Hubbs wrote:
> > > All,
> > > #
> > > # Pinkie Pie discovered an issue in the futex subsystem that allows a
> > > # loc
pgtune is masked for removal 2015-03-08. It's dead upstream, has a
critical bug 530868, and doesn't use a real distribution model. Adopt
the package upstream to save it.
An online alternative lives at:
http://pgtune.leopard.in.ua/
--
Mr. Aaron W. Swenson
Gentoo Linux Developer
Herds/Projects
On Wed, Jan 7, 2015 at 10:52 AM, William Hubbs wrote:
> My understanding of p.mask is it is never permanent. Things go in
> there until they get fixed or eventually removed.
I disagree with this. In my opinion, it is fine to have permanently
masked packages in some cases. I don't really care what
On Wed, Jan 7, 2015 at 1:11 PM, William Hubbs wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 07, 2015 at 12:24:12PM -0500, Mike Pagano wrote:
>> On Wed, Jan 07, 2015 at 12:14:23PM -0500, Mike Gilbert wrote:
>> > On Wed, Jan 7, 2015 at 12:11 PM, William Hubbs wrote:
>> > > On Wed, Jan 07, 2015 at 11:21:56AM -0500, Mike Pag
On Wed, Jan 07, 2015 at 12:24:12PM -0500, Mike Pagano wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 07, 2015 at 12:14:23PM -0500, Mike Gilbert wrote:
> > On Wed, Jan 7, 2015 at 12:11 PM, William Hubbs wrote:
> > > On Wed, Jan 07, 2015 at 11:21:56AM -0500, Mike Pagano wrote:
> > >> On Tue, Jan 06, 2015 at 05:47:10PM -0600,
On Wed, Jan 07, 2015 at 12:14:23PM -0500, Mike Gilbert wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 7, 2015 at 12:11 PM, William Hubbs wrote:
> > On Wed, Jan 07, 2015 at 11:21:56AM -0500, Mike Pagano wrote:
> >> On Tue, Jan 06, 2015 at 05:47:10PM -0600, William Hubbs wrote:
> >> > All,
> >> >
>
> If you remove the mask,
On Wed, Jan 7, 2015 at 7:57 AM, William Hubbs wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 07, 2015 at 06:49:56AM -0500, Philip Webb wrote:
>> 150106 William Hubbs wrote:
>> This one is perfectly safe on a single-user system : please leave it there.
>
> I'm not opposed to it staying in the tree under one of these conditi
On Wed, Jan 7, 2015 at 12:11 PM, William Hubbs wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 07, 2015 at 11:21:56AM -0500, Mike Pagano wrote:
>> On Tue, Jan 06, 2015 at 05:47:10PM -0600, William Hubbs wrote:
>> > All,
>> >
>> > these packages have been masked in the tree for months - years with no
>> > signs of fixes.
>>
On Wed, Jan 07, 2015 at 11:21:56AM -0500, Mike Pagano wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 06, 2015 at 05:47:10PM -0600, William Hubbs wrote:
> > All,
> >
> > these packages have been masked in the tree for months - years with no
> > signs of fixes.
> >
> > I am particularly concerned about packages with known s
150107 William Hubbs wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 07, 2015 at 06:49:56AM -0500, Philip Webb wrote:
>> 150106 William Hubbs wrote:
>>> Many packages have been masked in the tree for months - years
>>> with no signs of fixes. I am particularly concerned
>>> about packages with known security vulnerabilities
On Tue, Jan 06, 2015 at 05:47:10PM -0600, William Hubbs wrote:
> All,
>
> these packages have been masked in the tree for months - years with no
> signs of fixes.
>
> I am particularly concerned about packages with known security
> vulnerabilities staying in the main tree masked. If people want t
On Wed, Jan 07, 2015 at 06:49:56AM -0500, Philip Webb wrote:
> 150106 William Hubbs wrote:
> > Many packages have been masked in the tree for months - years
> > with no signs of fixes. I am particularly concerned
> > about packages with known security vulnerabilities
> > staying in the main tree m
On Wed, Jan 07, 2015 at 03:10:13PM +0200, Alan McKinnon wrote:
> On 07/01/2015 14:56, Rich Freeman wrote:
> > On Tue, Jan 6, 2015 at 6:47 PM, William Hubbs wrote:
> >>
> >> I am particularly concerned about packages with known security
> >> vulnerabilities staying in the main tree masked. If peopl
El lun, 01-12-2014 a las 12:00 +0100, Pacho Ramos escribió:
> El vie, 14-11-2014 a las 04:02 +0100, Tom Wijsman escribió:
> > On Tue, 11 Nov 2014 16:59:46 +0200
> > Pavlos Ratis wrote:
> >
> > > I will also drop myself from the net-proxy herd.
> >
> > Drawing extra attention to this sentence; it
Hello
Looks like this herd has some unattended bugs for years
(for example applying to qmail-scanner and some others). I was wondering
if maybe the herd should be dissolved and people should take the
packages they are really taking care of :/
I would do that in a week if nobody wants to join the
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 1/6/2015 6:47 PM, William Hubbs wrote:
> All,
>
> these packages have been masked in the tree for months - years with
> no signs of fixes.
>
> I am particularly concerned about packages with known security
> vulnerabilities staying in the main tr
On 07/01/2015 14:56, Rich Freeman wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 6, 2015 at 6:47 PM, William Hubbs wrote:
>>
>> I am particularly concerned about packages with known security
>> vulnerabilities staying in the main tree masked. If people want to keep
>> using those packages, I don't want to stop them, but pa
On Tue, Jan 6, 2015 at 6:47 PM, William Hubbs wrote:
>
> I am particularly concerned about packages with known security
> vulnerabilities staying in the main tree masked. If people want to keep
> using those packages, I don't want to stop them, but packages like this
> should not be in the main tr
150106 William Hubbs wrote:
> Many packages have been masked in the tree for months - years
> with no signs of fixes. I am particularly concerned
> about packages with known security vulnerabilities
> staying in the main tree masked. If people want to keep those packages,
> I don't want to stop t
On 01/07/15 06:24, William Hubbs wrote:
> All,
>
> Many packages have been masked in the tree for months - years with no
> signs of fixes.
>
> I am particularly concerned about packages with known security
> vulnerabilities staying in the main tree masked. If people want to keep
> using those pac
34 matches
Mail list logo
