[gentoo-dev] Re: qa last rites -- long list

2015-01-08 Thread Jonathan Callen
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 On 01/08/2015 02:23 AM, Daniel Campbell wrote: > On 01/07/2015 04:19 PM, Jonathan Callen wrote: >> On 01/07/2015 12:15 PM, Matt Turner wrote: >>> On Wed, Jan 7, 2015 at 7:57 AM, William Hubbs >>> wrote: On Wed, Jan 07, 2015 at 06:49:56AM -0500

Re: [gentoo-dev] Maintainer stabilizations

2015-01-08 Thread Ciaran McCreesh
On Thu, 08 Jan 2015 22:00:16 +0300 Mikle Kolyada wrote: > Major arches are amd64 and x86, nothing more. There is a bug for it > already [1] Isn't x86 basically a dead legacy arch by now? -- Ciaran McCreesh signature.asc Description: PGP signature

Re: [gentoo-dev] Maintainer stabilizations

2015-01-08 Thread Mikle Kolyada
08.01.2015 21:12, Michael Orlitzky пишет: > On 01/08/2015 12:57 PM, Mikle Kolyada wrote: >> 08.01.2015 20:15, Michael Orlitzky пишет: >>> I vaguely remember a discussion about maintainers stabilizing their own >>> packages -- maybe just on x86 and amd64 -- to take the load off of the >>> arch team

Re: [gentoo-dev] Maintainer stabilizations

2015-01-08 Thread Michael Orlitzky
On 01/08/2015 01:42 PM, Matthias Maier wrote: > >> >> I'm going to write a devmanual patch but don't want to sound like a lunatic. >> > > Also, an informal definition on what is supposed to be appropriate > hardware and userland (e.g. clean amd64 profile) and what are keywording > best practices

Re: [gentoo-dev] Maintainer stabilizations

2015-01-08 Thread Matthias Maier
> > I'm going to write a devmanual patch but don't want to sound like a lunatic. > Also, an informal definition on what is supposed to be appropriate hardware and userland (e.g. clean amd64 profile) and what are keywording best practices would be nice to have. (Alternatively a link to the respect

Re: [gentoo-dev] Maintainer stabilizations

2015-01-08 Thread Michael Orlitzky
On 01/08/2015 12:57 PM, Mikle Kolyada wrote: > > 08.01.2015 20:15, Michael Orlitzky пишет: >> I vaguely remember a discussion about maintainers stabilizing their own >> packages -- maybe just on x86 and amd64 -- to take the load off of the >> arch teams. >> >> Did that really happen or am I making

Re: [gentoo-dev] Maintainer stabilizations

2015-01-08 Thread Mikle Kolyada
08.01.2015 20:15, Michael Orlitzky пишет: > I vaguely remember a discussion about maintainers stabilizing their own > packages -- maybe just on x86 and amd64 -- to take the load off of the > arch teams. > > Did that really happen or am I making it up? Is it written down anywhere? > amd64/x86 are

Re: [gentoo-dev] Maintainer stabilizations

2015-01-08 Thread Ulrich Mueller
> On Thu, 08 Jan 2015, Michael Orlitzky wrote: > I vaguely remember a discussion about maintainers stabilizing their > own packages -- maybe just on x86 and amd64 -- to take the load off > of the arch teams. > Did that really happen or am I making it up? Is it written down > anywhere? Sure i

[gentoo-dev] Maintainer stabilizations

2015-01-08 Thread Michael Orlitzky
I vaguely remember a discussion about maintainers stabilizing their own packages -- maybe just on x86 and amd64 -- to take the load off of the arch teams. Did that really happen or am I making it up? Is it written down anywhere?

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: qa last rites -- long list

2015-01-08 Thread William Hubbs
On Thu, Jan 08, 2015 at 05:53:47AM -0500, Rich Freeman wrote: > On Thu, Jan 8, 2015 at 4:45 AM, Pacho Ramos wrote: > > El mié, 07-01-2015 a las 19:19 -0500, Jonathan Callen escribió: > > [...] > >> The only reason there is a security issue with nethack (and other > >> games like it) on Gentoo, and

Re: [gentoo-dev] Packages up for grabs

2015-01-08 Thread Eray Aslan
On Wed, Jan 07, 2015 at 03:06:08PM +0100, Pacho Ramos wrote: > Done, this packages are now up for grabs: > net-libs/libecap Got it. Need it as a dependency for net-proxy/squid. Help is always welcome. -- Eray

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: qa last rites -- long list

2015-01-08 Thread Rich Freeman
On Thu, Jan 8, 2015 at 4:45 AM, Pacho Ramos wrote: > El mié, 07-01-2015 a las 19:19 -0500, Jonathan Callen escribió: > [...] >> The only reason there is a security issue with nethack (and other >> games like it) on Gentoo, and only on Gentoo, is that the games team >> policy requires that all game

Re: [gentoo-dev] qa last rites multiple packages

2015-01-08 Thread Sergei Trofimovich
On Tue, 6 Jan 2015 17:47:10 -0600 William Hubbs wrote: > # Michael Weber (9 Jul 2013) > # Masked for security bug 450746, CVE-2012-6095 > signature.asc Description: PGP signature

[gentoo-dev] Re: Packages up for grabs

2015-01-08 Thread Duncan
Duncan posted on Thu, 08 Jan 2015 09:28:02 + as excerpted: > Andrew Savchenko posted on Thu, 08 Jan 2015 04:29:42 +0300 as excerpted: > >> On Wed, 07 Jan 2015 15:06:08 +0100 Pacho Ramos wrote: > >>> Done, this packages are now up for grabs: >> >>> net-proxy/privoxy >> >> I'll take them if

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: qa last rites -- long list

2015-01-08 Thread Pacho Ramos
El mié, 07-01-2015 a las 19:19 -0500, Jonathan Callen escribió: [...] > The only reason there is a security issue with nethack (and other > games like it) on Gentoo, and only on Gentoo, is that the games team > policy requires that all games have permissions 0750, with group > "games", and all user

[gentoo-dev] Re: Packages up for grabs

2015-01-08 Thread Duncan
Andrew Savchenko posted on Thu, 08 Jan 2015 04:29:42 +0300 as excerpted: > On Wed, 07 Jan 2015 15:06:08 +0100 Pacho Ramos wrote: >> Done, this packages are now up for grabs: > >> net-proxy/privoxy > > I'll take them if there are no other people interested. If you are — > feel free to add yourse