-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 02/04/2015 04:43 AM, Mike Auty wrote:
> It's fine to have disagreements, but airing them in front of the
> users like this is not an ideal situation...
As a user and prospective developer, why? Transparency is important to
open communities like Ge
On Friday, February 06, 2015 4:24:58 AM Jason Zaman wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 06, 2015 at 02:46:37AM +, Luke Dashjr wrote:
> > On Friday, February 06, 2015 2:10:31 AM hasufell wrote:
> > > Why does it not use git-r3?
> >
> > I just looked into this, and I don't see a way to get git-r3 to use the
>
On Fri, Feb 06, 2015 at 02:46:37AM +, Luke Dashjr wrote:
> On Friday, February 06, 2015 2:10:31 AM hasufell wrote:
> > Why does it not use git-r3?
>
> I just looked into this, and I don't see a way to get git-r3 to use the same
> repositories already cloned for previous versions. What is the
On Friday, February 06, 2015 2:10:31 AM hasufell wrote:
> Afais the eclass is missing the safeguard, as in
I wasn't aware this was needed. Basically just wrap everything except
EXPORT_FUNCTIONS in it? I couldn't find it documented anywhere...
> Why is EAPI=5 not supported?
*Only* EAPI=5 is supp
hasufell:
> We had this with qt eclass once and it wasn't really correct,
> but rather a convenience shortcut.
>
sorry, I meant KDE
> On 05/02/15 07:11 PM, Anthony G. Basile wrote:
> > I proxy a set of bitcoin ebuilds for Luke-jr. Currently several ebuilds
> > make use of the same codebase, so its probably a good idea to migrate
> > that code to an eclass. Can we have the following eclass reviewed
> > before committing it to
Anthony G. Basile:
> Hi everyone,
>
> I proxy a set of bitcoin ebuilds for Luke-jr. Currently several ebuilds
> make use of the same codebase, so its probably a good idea to migrate
> that code to an eclass. Can we have the following eclass reviewed
> before committing it to the tree:
>
> https
On 05/02/15 07:11 PM, Anthony G. Basile wrote:
> Hi everyone,
>
> I proxy a set of bitcoin ebuilds for Luke-jr. Currently several ebuilds
> make use of the same codebase, so its probably a good idea to migrate
> that code to an eclass. Can we have the following eclass reviewed
> before committin
Hi everyone,
I proxy a set of bitcoin ebuilds for Luke-jr. Currently several ebuilds
make use of the same codebase, so its probably a good idea to migrate
that code to an eclass. Can we have the following eclass reviewed
before committing it to the tree:
https://gitorious.org/bitcoin/gento
On Thu, Feb 5, 2015 at 11:20 AM, hasufell wrote:
>
> 57% is not "pretty strongly". It's a bit more than the half.
>
Sure, but libav as the default only got 5% of the vote. I think the
poll suffers from over-complexity. :)
I don't think we should be putting all of our stock in forum polls,
but
Ben de Groot:
> On 4 February 2015 at 21:49, Chí-Thanh Christopher Nguyễn
> wrote:
>> Ulrich Mueller schrieb:
>>>
>>> In the replies to http://forums.gentoo.org/viewtopic.php?p=7694982
>>> several users have expressed their preference for ffmpeg.
>>
>> To help finding out what users actually think
On 4 February 2015 at 21:49, Chí-Thanh Christopher Nguyễn
wrote:
> Ulrich Mueller schrieb:
>>
>> In the replies to http://forums.gentoo.org/viewtopic.php?p=7694982
>> several users have expressed their preference for ffmpeg.
>
> To help finding out what users actually think, I added a poll to the
12 matches
Mail list logo
