Re: [gentoo-dev] what's the correct format for bugs containing package name and version?

2015-03-05 Thread Mike Frysinger
On 05 Mar 2015 20:01, "Paweł Hajdan, Jr." wrote: > I'm trying to find the best fix for > > > Currently file-stabilization-bugs.py uses the '%s: stabilization > request' % cpv format. > > Here are some options I see: > > a) keep '%s:' as is > b) ch

Re: [gentoo-dev] what's the correct format for bugs containing package name and version?

2015-03-05 Thread Kent Fredric
On 6 March 2015 at 09:03, Michael Orlitzky wrote: > I've settled on using a colon i.e. "jer format." If the bug references a > specific version (range), then I use =, >=, etc. appropriately. In the > case of stabilization bugs, I'd throw in the "=". > I was under the impression adding "=" was ju

Re: [gentoo-dev] what's the correct format for bugs containing package name and version?

2015-03-05 Thread Michael Orlitzky
On 03/05/2015 03:03 PM, Michael Orlitzky wrote: > > I've settled on using a colon i.e. "jer format." If the bug references a > specific version (range), then I use =, >=, etc. appropriately. In the > case of stabilization bugs, I'd throw in the "=". > > So, (c). > Crap, I flipped a bit. I remem

Re: [gentoo-dev] what's the correct format for bugs containing package name and version?

2015-03-05 Thread Michael Orlitzky
On 03/05/2015 02:01 PM, "Paweł Hajdan, Jr." wrote: > I'm trying to find the best fix for > > > Currently file-stabilization-bugs.py uses the '%s: stabilization > request' % cpv format. > > Here are some options I see: > > a) keep '%s:' as is > b)

[gentoo-dev] what's the correct format for bugs containing package name and version?

2015-03-05 Thread Paweł Hajdan, Jr.
I'm trying to find the best fix for Currently file-stabilization-bugs.py uses the '%s: stabilization request' % cpv format. Here are some options I see: a) keep '%s:' as is b) change to just '%s' c) change to '=%s:' d) change to '=%s' e) something