Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Current Gentoo Git setup / man-in-the-middle attacks

2015-03-30 Thread Vadim A. Misbakh-Soloviov
Yes, we should add possibilities, but not revoke them from user. That is a Gentoo Philosophy. We shouldn't enforce users to anything that, as we think, is better for them. Even about security. And yes, we even shouldn't forbid them to install heartbleaded openssl (thankfully, users is free to do

Re: [gentoo-dev] Should Gentoo do https by default?

2015-03-30 Thread Dean Stephens
On 03/27/15 15:29, Hanno Böck wrote: > These days pretty much all big players use https only (google, > facebook, twitter, github, ...). You can't really use the > mainstream internet if your firewall blocks https. > Can we please stop making stuff up[1] just to make an argument seem stronger to t

回复:Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC News item: FFmpeg default

2015-03-30 Thread Nicol TAO
so. believe it or not? 在2015年03月30日 01:02,Peter Stuge 写道: Ben de Groot wrote: > Title: FFmpeg default > Posted: 2015-04-01 Bad date for such news. //Peter

Re: [gentoo-dev] ALLARCHES bugzilla keyword for stabilization requests

2015-03-30 Thread Tim Harder
On 2015-03-30 17:14, James Le Cuirot wrote: > I tried to find the council meeting minutes where this was discussed > but to no avail. :( Sorry, I'm a bit slow. I'll be writing those up when I send out the next call for agenda items this week. Tim signature.asc Description: PGP signature

Re: [gentoo-dev] ALLARCHES bugzilla keyword for stabilization requests

2015-03-30 Thread James Le Cuirot
On Thu, 12 Mar 2015 13:35:16 +0100 "Andreas K. Huettel" wrote: > as a result of the last council meeting we now have a new keyword > ALLARCHES for stablerequest bugs on bugzilla. We're thinking of applying this to Java because we have a massive workload ahead of us and stabilization is making li

Re: [gentoo-dev] arm64 profile deletes?

2015-03-30 Thread Tom Gall
> On Mar 30, 2015, at 11:55 AM, Ulrich Mueller wrote: > >> On Mon, 30 Mar 2015, Alexandre Rostovtsev wrote: > On Mon, 2015-03-30 at 09:54 -0500, Tom Gall wrote: > Sorry for the trouble. My cvs history foo is a little weak but > it appears that someone went out and did some dele

Re: [gentoo-dev] arm64 profile deletes?

2015-03-30 Thread Ulrich Mueller
> On Mon, 30 Mar 2015, Alexandre Rostovtsev wrote: >> > On Mon, 2015-03-30 at 09:54 -0500, Tom Gall wrote: >> >> Sorry for the trouble. My cvs history foo is a little weak but >> >> it appears that someone went out and did some deleting in >> >> profiles/arch/arm64 of some WIP things without b

Re: [gentoo-dev] rfc: add-on files handling improvements

2015-03-30 Thread Thomas D.
Hi, William Hubbs wrote: > I believe, back in the day we started this practice, portage did not > support --newuse or --changed-use, so there was no way to only update > packages that had changed or new use flags. In that situation, I > understand why we installed all of these add-on files uncondi

Re: [gentoo-dev] arm64 profile deletes?

2015-03-30 Thread Mike Frysinger
On 30 Mar 2015 09:54, Tom Gall wrote: > Sorry for the trouble. My cvs history foo is a little weak but it appears > that someone went out and did some deleting in profiles/arch/arm64 of some > WIP > things without bothering to email, irc or otherwise communicate. just use the web viewer:

Re: [gentoo-dev] arm64 profile deletes?

2015-03-30 Thread Alexandre Rostovtsev
On Mon, 2015-03-30 at 10:37 -0500, Tom Gall wrote: > > On Mar 30, 2015, at 10:18 AM, Alexandre Rostovtsev > > wrote: > > > > On Mon, 2015-03-30 at 09:54 -0500, Tom Gall wrote: > >> Hi All, > >> > >> Sorry for the trouble. My cvs history foo is a little weak but it appears > >> that someone wen

Re: [gentoo-dev] arm64 profile deletes?

2015-03-30 Thread Tom Gall
> On Mar 30, 2015, at 10:18 AM, Alexandre Rostovtsev > wrote: > > On Mon, 2015-03-30 at 09:54 -0500, Tom Gall wrote: >> Hi All, >> >> Sorry for the trouble. My cvs history foo is a little weak but it appears >> that someone went out and did some deleting in profiles/arch/arm64 of some >> WIP

Re: [gentoo-dev] arm64 profile deletes?

2015-03-30 Thread Alexandre Rostovtsev
On Mon, 2015-03-30 at 09:54 -0500, Tom Gall wrote: > Hi All, > > Sorry for the trouble. My cvs history foo is a little weak but it appears > that someone went out and did some deleting in profiles/arch/arm64 of some > WIP things without bothering to email, irc or otherwise communicate. > > A) C

[gentoo-dev] arm64 profile deletes?

2015-03-30 Thread Tom Gall
Hi All, Sorry for the trouble. My cvs history foo is a little weak but it appears that someone went out and did some deleting in profiles/arch/arm64 of some WIP things without bothering to email, irc or otherwise communicate. A) Could the guilty party come forward? B) If there was something ob

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Current Gentoo Git setup / man-in-the-middle attacks

2015-03-30 Thread Diamond
On Mon, 30 Mar 2015 11:57:45 +0300 Andrew Savchenko wrote: > The Gentoo tree is not verified anyway: mirrors distribute it via > http, rsync and ftp. And using https for that will create a > tremendous stress on mirror's CPUs, so this is a bad approach. > Not to mention that https itself is very

Re: [gentoo-dev] multilib and different CFLAGS for 32 and 64bit ABIs

2015-03-30 Thread Matthias Schwarzott
On 29.03.2015 23:29, Davide Pesavento wrote: > On Sun, Mar 29, 2015 at 9:12 PM, Matthias Schwarzott wrote: >> On 29.03.2015 20:58, Matthias Schwarzott wrote: >>> Hi there! >>> >>> I updated my ~amd64 system recently to new hardware (Intel Core i3-4160). >>> Since then valgrind did no longer work f

Re: [gentoo-dev] rfc: add-on files handling improvements

2015-03-30 Thread Rich Freeman
On Sun, Mar 29, 2015 at 10:14 PM, William Hubbs wrote: > On Sun, Mar 29, 2015 at 07:49:32PM -0400, Rich Freeman wrote: > >> Not everybody uses logrotate, xinetd, cron.d, and so on. It still >> makes sense to just install the files, since they passively sit there >> doing nothing in those cases. >

[gentoo-dev] Re: RFC: app-eselect category

2015-03-30 Thread Ulrich Mueller
Since I've seen only favourable replies, I'm going to create the category on Wednesday. I'll also take care of the package moves and of reverse dependencies. For the category metadata I currently have: The app-eselect category contains modules for the eselect configuration and ad

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Current Gentoo Git setup / man-in-the-middle attacks

2015-03-30 Thread Andrew Savchenko
On Mon, 30 Mar 2015 05:37:01 + (UTC) Duncan wrote: > Andrew Savchenko posted on Sun, 29 Mar 2015 21:04:52 +0300 as excerpted: > > > On Sun, 29 Mar 2015 19:52:38 +0200 Sebastian Pipping wrote: > >> On 29.03.2015 19:39, Andrew Savchenko wrote: > >> > On Sun, 29 Mar 2015 18:41:33 +0200 Sebastian