Hey all,
pkgcore-0.9 is now in the tree with working EAPI 5 support with the
exception of subslot rebuilds. Alongside that, pkgcore-checks (pcheck)
has been renamed to pkgcheck and dev-util/pkgcheck-0.5 now in the tree
should be able to perform full tree scans or whatever you were doing
with pkgco
On Wed, 01 Apr 2015 14:29:53 -0400 Joshua Kinard wrote:
> Arguably the best 04/01 gag I've seen today. Can we keep this?
Seconded. I'm receiving numerous reports from users that they like
this theme very much, it suits Gentoo great. So having it at least
somewhere at the web attic will be nice.
Our bug queue has 97 bugs!
If you have some spare time, please help assign/sort a few bugs.
To view the bug queue, click here: http://bit.ly/m8PQS5
Thanks!
>
> Nearly as funny as the one about Gentoo switching to CVS.
From what? AFAIR, it still on CVS...
--
Best regards,
mva
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
> I thought PetBox was pretty funny too.
>
> http://www.redbox.com/petbox?icamp=hp:mss:aprilfoolspetbox:4:1:2015
403 :(
--
Best regards,
mva
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
On Wed, 01 Apr 2015 14:29:53 -0400
Joshua Kinard wrote:
> Arguably the best 04/01 gag I've seen today. Can we keep this?
> It'll make browsing the site on old SGI machines so much easier...
Nearly as funny as the one about Gentoo switching to CVS.
--
Ciaran McCreesh
signature.asc
Description
On 4/1/2015 2:29 PM, Joshua Kinard wrote:
> Arguably the best 04/01 gag I've seen today. Can we keep this? It'll make
> browsing the site on old SGI machines so much easier...
>
I thought PetBox was pretty funny too.
http://www.redbox.com/petbox?icamp=hp:mss:aprilfoolspetbox:4:1:2015
Brian
Arguably the best 04/01 gag I've seen today. Can we keep this? It'll make
browsing the site on old SGI machines so much easier...
--
Joshua Kinard
Gentoo/MIPS
ku...@gentoo.org
4096R/D25D95E3 2011-03-28
"The past tempts us, the present confuses us, the future frightens us. And our
lives slip a
On Wed, 01 Apr 2015 14:59:01 +0200
Chí-Thanh Christopher Nguyễn wrote:
> As far as I know this is correct.
> All SSL protocol versions including v3 have known vulnerabilities.
Yeah, but this is a pointless statement in the discussion. Nobody says
we should deploy https via sslv3. Of course if pe
Thomas Kahle schrieb:
On 30/03/15 10:57, Andrew Savchenko wrote:
And using https for that will create a
tremendous stress on mirror's CPUs, so this is a bad approach.
Not to mention that https itself is very hapless protocol with tons
of vulnerabilities (all SSL versions are affected and most TL
On 30/03/15 10:57, Andrew Savchenko wrote:
> And using https for that will create a
> tremendous stress on mirror's CPUs, so this is a bad approach.
> Not to mention that https itself is very hapless protocol with tons
> of vulnerabilities (all SSL versions are affected and most TLS
> implementatio
11 matches
Mail list logo
