Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] check-reqs.eclass: fail check-reqs_memory() for virtual rather than physical RAM

2015-06-03 Thread Mike Gilbert
On Wed, Jun 3, 2015 at 4:22 PM, Christian Bricart christ...@bricart.de wrote: Dear devs, i've just hit the constraint CHECKREQS_MEMORY=3G in =www-client/chromium-44.* on a 2 GiB RAM machine.. (having additionally 5G Swap on SSD..) I personally doubt that check-reqs_memory() in the eclass

Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] check-reqs.eclass: fail check-reqs_memory() for virtual rather than physical RAM

2015-06-03 Thread Christian Bricart
Am 03.06.2015 um 22:32 schrieb Ciaran McCreesh: On Wed, 03 Jun 2015 22:22:39 +0200 i've just hit the constraint CHECKREQS_MEMORY=3G in =www-client/chromium-44.* on a 2 GiB RAM machine.. (having additionally 5G Swap on SSD..) I personally doubt that check-reqs_memory() in the eclass should

Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] check-reqs.eclass: fail check-reqs_memory() for virtual rather than physical RAM

2015-06-03 Thread Michał Górny
Dnia 2015-06-03, o godz. 22:39:10 Christian Bricart christ...@bricart.de napisał(a): Am 03.06.2015 um 22:32 schrieb Ciaran McCreesh: On Wed, 03 Jun 2015 22:22:39 +0200 i've just hit the constraint CHECKREQS_MEMORY=3G in =www-client/chromium-44.* on a 2 GiB RAM machine.. (having

[gentoo-dev] [RFC] check-reqs.eclass: fail check-reqs_memory() for virtual rather than physical RAM

2015-06-03 Thread Christian Bricart
Dear devs, i've just hit the constraint CHECKREQS_MEMORY=3G in =www-client/chromium-44.* on a 2 GiB RAM machine.. (having additionally 5G Swap on SSD..) I personally doubt that check-reqs_memory() in the eclass should only check for *physical* rather than *virtual* RAM to fulfill this constraint

Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] check-reqs.eclass: fail check-reqs_memory() for virtual rather than physical RAM

2015-06-03 Thread Ciaran McCreesh
On Wed, 03 Jun 2015 22:22:39 +0200 i've just hit the constraint CHECKREQS_MEMORY=3G in =www-client/chromium-44.* on a 2 GiB RAM machine.. (having additionally 5G Swap on SSD..) I personally doubt that check-reqs_memory() in the eclass should only check for *physical* rather than *virtual*

Re: [gentoo-dev] LFS QA warnings coming soon to a build near you

2015-06-03 Thread Mike Frysinger
On 03 Jun 2015 10:26, Alexis Ballier wrote: On Tue, 2 Jun 2015 10:13:54 -0400 Mike Frysinger wrote: On 01 Jun 2015 10:15, Alexis Ballier wrote: On Sun, 31 May 2015 11:17:50 -0400 Mike Frysinger wrote: (3) considering the glibc effort has been stalled for over a year, (1) is something

Re: [gentoo-dev] LFS QA warnings coming soon to a build near you

2015-06-03 Thread Alexis Ballier
On Tue, 2 Jun 2015 10:13:54 -0400 Mike Frysinger vap...@gentoo.org wrote: On 01 Jun 2015 10:15, Alexis Ballier wrote: On Sun, 31 May 2015 11:17:50 -0400 Mike Frysinger wrote: (3) considering the glibc effort has been stalled for over a year, (1) is something we can help accomplish and

Re: [gentoo-dev] newsitem: udev-init-script changes (second draft)

2015-06-03 Thread William Hubbs
All, here is the latest version of this news item. It will be submitted on 5 Jun if there is no feedback. William Title: udev-init-scripts-28 important changes Author: William Hubbs willi...@gentoo.org Content-Type: text/plain Posted: 2015-06-05 Revision: 1 News-Item-Format: 1.0

Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] [PATCH] runtests: rewrite in python

2015-06-03 Thread Mike Frysinger
On 30 May 2015 12:30, Brian Dolbec wrote: On Sat, 30 May 2015 14:27:25 -0400 Mike Frysinger wrote: +def get_python_executable(ver): + Find the right python executable for |ver| + if ver == 'pypy': + prog = 'pypy' + else: + prog