Re: [gentoo-dev] gcc-5 news item wrt C++ ABI

On Mon, Oct 5, 2015 at 8:45 PM, Paweł Hajdan, Jr. wrote: > Curious, can one reasonably easy downgrade from GCC 5 back to GCC 4? > I've gone 4->5, urg I don't want 5, 5->4, okay it works, hey wait I want 5, 4->5. Things went fine.

Re: [gentoo-dev] gcc-5 news item wrt C++ ABI

On 10/3/15 4:13 AM, Mike Frysinger wrote: > Title: GCC 5 Defaults to the New C++11 ABI > Author: Mike Frysinger > Content-Type: text/plain > Posted: 2015-10-02 > Revision: 1 > News-Item-Format: 1.0 > Display-If-Installed: >=sys-devel/gcc-5 > > GCC 5 uses the new C++ ABI by

Re: [gentoo-dev] gcc-5 news item wrt C++ ABI

On 10/3/15 7:30 PM, Ciaran McCreesh wrote: > On Sat, 3 Oct 2015 13:24:11 -0400 > Mike Frysinger wrote: >> On 03 Oct 2015 13:38, Ciaran McCreesh wrote: >>> On Fri, 2 Oct 2015 22:13:09 -0400 Mike Frysinger wrote: Display-If-Installed: >=sys-devel/gcc-5 >>> >>> This means

Re: [gentoo-dev] gcc-5 news item wrt C++ ABI

On 03 Oct 2015 18:30, Ciaran McCreesh wrote: > On Sat, 3 Oct 2015 13:24:11 -0400 Mike Frysinger wrote: > > On 03 Oct 2015 13:38, Ciaran McCreesh wrote: > > > On Fri, 2 Oct 2015 22:13:09 -0400 Mike Frysinger wrote: > > > > Display-If-Installed: >=sys-devel/gcc-5 > > > > > > This means that two

Re: [gentoo-dev] gcc-5 news item wrt C++ ABI

On 05 Oct 2015 20:45, Paweł Hajdan, Jr. wrote: > On 10/3/15 4:13 AM, Mike Frysinger wrote: > > Title: GCC 5 Defaults to the New C++11 ABI > > Author: Mike Frysinger > > Content-Type: text/plain > > Posted: 2015-10-02 > > Revision: 1 > > News-Item-Format: 1.0 > >

Re: [gentoo-dev] gcc-5 news item wrt C++ ABI

On 04 Oct 2015 01:16, hasufell wrote: > On 10/03/2015 04:13 AM, Mike Frysinger wrote: > > Title: GCC 5 Defaults to the New C++11 ABI > > Author: Mike Frysinger > > Content-Type: text/plain > > Posted: 2015-10-02 > > Revision: 1 > > News-Item-Format: 1.0 > >

Re: [gentoo-dev] gcc-5 news item wrt C++ ABI

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 Dnia 4 października 2015 01:16:51 CEST, hasufell napisał(a): >On 10/03/2015 04:13 AM, Mike Frysinger wrote: >> Title: GCC 5 Defaults to the New C++11 ABI >> Author: Mike Frysinger >> Content-Type:

Re: [gentoo-dev] Python 3.5 is in, Python 3.3 deprecation

On 10/05/2015 08:43 AM, Mike Gilbert wrote: > On Mon, Oct 5, 2015 at 9:08 AM, wrote: >> On Sun, 4 Oct 2015, Mike Gilbert wrote: >>> >>> Python 3.5 has been added to ~arch this morning. Please feel free to >>> test and add python3_5 to PYTHON_COMPAT as appropriate. >> >> And

[gentoo-portage-dev] [PATCH] SyncRepos.async: group sync and callback as composite task (bug 562264)

Group together the sync operation and the callback as a single task, so that the callback will not execute concurrently with another sync operation for --jobs=1. X-Gentoo-Bug: 562264 X-Gentoo-Bug-URL: https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=562264 --- pym/portage/sync/controller.py | 39

Re: [gentoo-dev] Python 3.5 is in, Python 3.3 deprecation

On Sun, 4 Oct 2015 10:11:48 -0400 Mike Gilbert wrote: > Hi all, > > Python 3.5 has been added to ~arch this morning. Please feel free to > test and add python3_5 to PYTHON_COMPAT as appropriate. > > Also, to keep the number of supported implementations manageable, I > would

Re: [gentoo-dev] Python 3.5 is in, Python 3.3 deprecation

On Sun, 4 Oct 2015, Mike Gilbert wrote: Python 3.5 has been added to ~arch this morning. Please feel free to test and add python3_5 to PYTHON_COMPAT as appropriate. And where's python-docs:3.5? Andrey

Re: [gentoo-dev] LibreSSL switch-over progress

On 10/05/2015 05:28 PM, Jason A. Donenfeld wrote: > Last night I tried to enable that flag globally, and then reemerge > everything relevant. Unfortunately, I got some unresolvable blockers. Yes, it is currently practically impossible to enable it. However, you can use the

Re: [gentoo-dev] Python 3.5 is in, Python 3.3 deprecation

On Mon, Oct 5, 2015 at 9:08 AM, wrote: > On Sun, 4 Oct 2015, Mike Gilbert wrote: >> >> Python 3.5 has been added to ~arch this morning. Please feel free to >> test and add python3_5 to PYTHON_COMPAT as appropriate. > > And where's python-docs:3.5? I always forget about

Re: [gentoo-dev] LibreSSL switch-over progress

Perfect. Exactly the information I was looking for. Thanks a bunch.

Re: [gentoo-dev] LibreSSL switch-over progress

On Mon, Oct 5, 2015 at 11:28 AM, Jason A. Donenfeld wrote: > I assume there are developers hard > at work adding the flag to each and every package. Keep in mind that it isn't always a drop-in replacement. If it were we'd just make a virtual for libssl and you wouldn't need to

Re: [gentoo-dev] LibreSSL switch-over progress

Dnia 2015-10-05, o godz. 17:28:55 "Jason A. Donenfeld" napisał(a): > Last night I tried to enable that flag globally, and then reemerge > everything relevant. Unfortunately, I got some unresolvable blockers. > Presumably the reason is that some packages have the libressl USE >

Re: [gentoo-dev] LibreSSL switch-over progress

On 10/05/2015 05:28 PM, Jason A. Donenfeld wrote: > > I assume there are developers hard > at work adding the flag to each and every package. > Exactly one. And because of that it will take another few weeks (maybe even months) until we are there.

[gentoo-dev] LibreSSL switch-over progress

Hi guys, I've seen we now have a libressl USE flag, per the discussion in the other thread. Horrah! Last night I tried to enable that flag globally, and then reemerge everything relevant. Unfortunately, I got some unresolvable blockers. Presumably the reason is that some packages have the