Re: [gentoo-dev] [PATCH] metadata: add slots element

2015-10-13 Thread Alexis Ballier
On Tue, 13 Oct 2015 08:11:44 +0800 Ian Delaney wrote: > On Mon, 12 Oct 2015 20:01:15 +0200 > hasufell wrote: > > > On 10/12/2015 07:49 PM, Alexis Ballier wrote: > > > On Mon, 12 Oct 2015 19:19:33 +0200 > > > Julian Ospald wrote:

Re: [gentoo-dev] [PATCH] metadata: add slots element

2015-10-13 Thread hasufell
On 10/13/2015 09:51 AM, Alexis Ballier wrote: > > that would work too, but dtd provides standardization, and avoids > duplicating package-wide information (meaning of slot/subslot) in every > single ebuild. > Yeah, the only thing that I wasn't sure about is the subslots part. With the proposed

Re: [gentoo-dev] [PATCH] metadata: add slots element

2015-10-13 Thread Alexis Ballier
On Tue, 13 Oct 2015 11:39:04 +0200 hasufell wrote: > On 10/13/2015 09:51 AM, Alexis Ballier wrote: > > > > that would work too, but dtd provides standardization, and avoids > > duplicating package-wide information (meaning of slot/subslot) in > > every single ebuild. > >

[gentoo-dev] Re: [PATCH] metadata: add slots element

2015-10-13 Thread Michael Palimaka
On 13/10/15 04:19, Julian Ospald wrote: > There seems to be some general confusion about specific package SLOTs > and their meaning, since there can be several naming schemes applied > and documentation is either non-existent or is inside the ebuild via > comments. > Because of that it should be

Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] [PATCH] repoman: Set max DESCRIPTION length to 80, #562808

2015-10-13 Thread Michał Górny
Dnia 2015-10-12, o godz. 08:58:10 Zac Medico napisał(a): > On 10/12/2015 12:52 AM, Michał Górny wrote: > > Correct the max DESCRIPTION length in qa_data, and remove the comment > > confusingly suggesting that the variable name is taken into the count. > > > > Bug:

[gentoo-portage-dev] Tools-Portage Lead

2015-10-13 Thread Paul Varner
All: I inherited the tools-portage lead position on 12/1/2008 when genone retired from Gentoo, and have been the lead since that time. Reading GLEP-39, it is not clear to me if a sub-project needs to have their leads elected or not. Anyhow, I'm asking the following: 1. Do we want to elect a

[gentoo-dev] [PATCH] autotools.eclass: support AM_GNU_GETTEXT_REQUIRE_VERSION

2015-10-13 Thread Michał Górny
gettext 0.19.6 supports AM_GNU_GETTEXT_REQUIRE_VERSION in addition to AM_GNU_GETTEXT_VERSION. --- eclass/autotools.eclass | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) // proxying this patch for Michał Bartoszkiewicz // https://github.com/gentoo/gentoo/pull/163 diff --git

[gentoo-dev] Re: [PATCH] autotools.eclass: support AM_GNU_GETTEXT_REQUIRE_VERSION

2015-10-13 Thread Mike Frysinger
On 13 Oct 2015 18:25, Michał Górny wrote: > gettext 0.19.6 supports AM_GNU_GETTEXT_REQUIRE_VERSION in addition to > AM_GNU_GETTEXT_VERSION. ok, although not entirely correct -- gettexize supports this, but autoreconf does not. we also send a patch to the autoconf project to update things. > //

Re: [gentoo-dev] [PATCH] metadata: add slots element

2015-10-13 Thread Manuel Rüger
On 13.10.2015 11:39, hasufell wrote: > On 10/13/2015 09:51 AM, Alexis Ballier wrote: >> >> that would work too, but dtd provides standardization, and avoids >> duplicating package-wide information (meaning of slot/subslot) in every >> single ebuild. >> > > Yeah, the only thing that I wasn't sure

Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] Tools-Portage Lead

2015-10-13 Thread Rich Freeman
On Tue, Oct 13, 2015 at 1:47 PM, Paul Varner wrote: > Reading GLEP-39, it is not clear to me if a sub-project needs to have > their leads elected or not. No interest in interfering with whatever you guys come up with, but as far as I'm aware subprojects are just projects as