On Sun, 24 Jul 2016 00:04:53 +0200
"Andreas K. Huettel" wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA512
>
> Am Freitag, 22. Juli 2016, 15:57:36 schrieb Ciaran McCreesh:
>
> > > > Wrong. PMS specifically requests you to account for such a
> > > > possibility.
> > >
> > > Common sen
On Sun, 24 Jul 2016 00:04:53 +0200
"Andreas K. Huettel" wrote:
> 1) If a package only ever had one slot, it cannot ever have two
> versions installed at the same time. That guarantee (of only ever one
> slot) can be given for the portage tree (sic). Obviously it doesn't
> work for overlays, but th
On Sun, 24 Jul 2016 00:30:39 +0300
Andrew Savchenko wrote:
> Oh, nice: strictly follow PMS no matter what, right? Then let me
> remind you that not so long time ago I advocated for strictly
> following PMS [1,2], which _allows_ || ( A:= B:= ) construct [3].
>
> But I was _enforced_ by QA to _viol
Andreas K. Huettel posted on Sun, 24 Jul 2016 00:04:53 +0200 as excerpted:
> 1) If a package only ever had one slot, it cannot ever have two versions
> installed at the same time. That guarantee (of only ever one slot) can
> be given for the portage tree (sic). Obviously it doesn't work for
> over
Andrew Savchenko posted on Sun, 24 Jul 2016 00:30:39 +0300 as excerpted:
> Do we ever had such case like multiple versions of the same
> single-slotted package installed or recorded as installed in the real
> world? I'm not sure even in this, but I may assume that it may happen
> one day.
>
> Do
Michał Górny schrieb:
Ensure that proper number of parameters is passed to each versionator
function; die otherwise. This prevents the functions from proceeding
with undefined behavior when mis-called.
You are making what versionator.eclass accepts stricter. That it used to work
when passed mu
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Am Freitag, 22. Juli 2016, 15:57:36 schrieb Ciaran McCreesh:
> > > Wrong. PMS specifically requests you to account for such a
> > > possibility.
> >
> > Common sence must prevail over formal approaches. While PMS is
> > great, it is not perfect in
On Fri, 22 Jul 2016 15:49:55 +0200 Michał Górny wrote:
> On Fri, 22 Jul 2016 16:41:56 +0300
> Andrew Savchenko wrote:
>
> > On Fri, 22 Jul 2016 13:14:23 +0200 Michał Górny wrote:
> > > Dnia 22 lipca 2016 13:00:42 CEST, Andrew Savchenko
> > > napisał(a):
> > > >On Thu, 21 Jul 2016 07:12:12 +02
On Sat, 23 Jul 2016 15:38:26 +0100 Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
> On Sat, 23 Jul 2016 17:23:48 +0300
> Andrew Savchenko wrote:
> > On Fri, 22 Jul 2016 14:57:36 +0100 Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
> > > On Fri, 22 Jul 2016 16:41:56 +0300
> > > Andrew Savchenko wrote:
> > [...]
> > > > I see no point in trash
On Sat, 23 Jul 2016 17:23:48 +0300
Andrew Savchenko wrote:
> On Fri, 22 Jul 2016 14:57:36 +0100 Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
> > On Fri, 22 Jul 2016 16:41:56 +0300
> > Andrew Savchenko wrote:
> [...]
> > > I see no point in trashing ebuilds with dead code that will never
> > > be used. Though if ther
Hi,
On Fri, 22 Jul 2016 14:57:36 +0100 Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
> On Fri, 22 Jul 2016 16:41:56 +0300
> Andrew Savchenko wrote:
[...]
> > I see no point in trashing ebuilds with dead code that will never
> > be used. Though if there will be a PMS or eclass function with
> > "proper" implementation,
Ensure that proper number of parameters is passed to each versionator
function; die otherwise. This prevents the functions from proceeding
with undefined behavior when mis-called. However, it does not cover the
most common mistake of passing an empty version that implicitly gets
replaced by ${PV}.
Dnia 20 lipca 2016 15:36:20 CEST, "Vadim A. Misbakh-Soloviov"
napisał(a):
>Hi there!
>
>I've done (actualy, long time ago) lua.eclass to ease maintenance of
>dev-lua
>packages in a way of dev-ruby and dev-python packages (including
>TARGETS and
>so).
>
>All ebuilds in lua overlay is already por
13 matches
Mail list logo