Re: [gentoo-dev] rfc: /etc/hostname on gentoo

2016-08-27 Thread M. J. Everitt
On 28/08/16 07:30, Daniel Campbell wrote: > On 08/24/2016 09:42 AM, Zac Medico wrote: >> On 08/24/2016 09:33 AM, Michael Orlitzky wrote: >>> * no benefit put forth so far, other than that it's the same file that >>> systemd uses, which is true but not beneficial as far as I can tell >> It's a

Re: [gentoo-dev] rfc: /etc/hostname on gentoo

2016-08-27 Thread Michał Górny
On Sat, 27 Aug 2016 23:30:09 -0700 Daniel Campbell wrote: > On 08/24/2016 09:42 AM, Zac Medico wrote: > > On 08/24/2016 09:33 AM, Michael Orlitzky wrote: > >> * no benefit put forth so far, other than that it's the same file that > >> systemd uses, which is true but not beneficial as far

Re: [gentoo-dev] base-system needs developers who care

2016-08-27 Thread Daniel Campbell
On 08/25/2016 01:01 AM, Alexis Ballier wrote: > On Tue, 23 Aug 2016 23:17:58 + > "Robin H. Johnson" wrote: > >> Over the years, the base-system package herd has grown in size. Today >> it comprises 320 packages, of which 61 of those have more than one >> maintainer. The packages with more tha

Re: [gentoo-dev] rfc: /etc/hostname on gentoo

2016-08-27 Thread Daniel Campbell
On 08/24/2016 09:42 AM, Zac Medico wrote: > On 08/24/2016 09:33 AM, Michael Orlitzky wrote: >> * no benefit put forth so far, other than that it's the same file that >> systemd uses, which is true but not beneficial as far as I can tell > > It's a de facto standard. Being different for the s

Re: [gentoo-dev] Package up for grabs

2016-08-27 Thread Hans de Graaff
On Wed, 2016-08-24 at 15:26 +0200, Lars Wendler wrote: > This package is now up for grabs: > net-irc/rbot I've added this package to the ruby project, but a more dedicated maintainer would still be welcome. Hans signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part

Re: [gentoo-dev] Empty project: Arch Testers

2016-08-27 Thread Raymond Jennings
On Mon, Aug 22, 2016 at 9:00 AM, Pacho Ramos wrote: > I am not sure when https://wiki.gentoo.org/wiki/Project:Arch_Testers wa > s created, but it's empty and unused for a long time, hence, I don't > know if anyone would be willing to join to it (I am unsure about what > will it cover over the "de