Re: [gentoo-dev] gpg: signing failed: Inappropriate ioctl for device

On Mon, Dec 12, 2016 at 09:34:21AM +0700, gro...@gentoo.org wrote: > On Sun, 11 Dec 2016, Kristian Fiskerstrand wrote: > > On 12/11/2016 03:13 PM, gro...@gentoo.org wrote: > >> gpg: signing failed: Inappropriate ioctl for device > > this might indicate a want for export GPG_TTY=$(tty) > I don't

Re: [gentoo-dev] Gcc 6 and Gcc 5 update

gro...@gentoo.org writes: > I hope gcj will remain in (which I use not very often but regularly). There are no real > alternatived: pdfshuffle fails on many (otherwise normal) pdf files. +1 I am a regular pdftk user. Benda

Re: [gentoo-dev] Gcc 6 and Gcc 5 update

On Sun, 11 Dec 2016, Magnus Granberg wrote: Gcc 6.X update: Gcc 6.3 will soon get released in one or two weeks on that the pie use flag will get unmasked and gcj will be masked for java is removed in gcc 7 I hope gcj will remain in use not very often but regularly). There are no real

Re: [gentoo-dev] gpg: signing failed: Inappropriate ioctl for device

On Sun, 11 Dec 2016, Kristian Fiskerstrand wrote: On 12/11/2016 03:13 PM, gro...@gentoo.org wrote: gpg: signing failed: Inappropriate ioctl for device this might indicate a want for export GPG_TTY=$(tty) I don't understand what has really happened. I removed my last commit, an attempt to

[gentoo-dev] Automated Package Removal and Addition Tracker, for the week ending 2016-12-11 23:59 UTC

/libfrontend-elements 20161205-18:01 soap 527b1e9 dev-java/jaffl 20161211-14:32 chewi ba97a9a dev-perl/extutils-pkgconfig 20161210-17:31 kentnl 7ac8116 kde-base/kactivities 20161208-12:01 johu d53d057 kde-base/plasma-workspace

Re: [gentoo-dev] Gcc 6 and Gcc 5 update

Hi, "Walter Dnes" writes: > Are the gmp, mpc, mpfr, and isl libs included? According to the > "Support libraries" section at https://gcc.gnu.org/wiki/InstallingGCC They are managed by their own ebuilds. >> Alternatively, after extracting the GCC source archive, simply

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Cross Post due to technical component - Thanks for all the fish

On 12/10/2016 01:12 AM, A. Wilcox wrote: > > So for one example, at Adélie we are focusing hard on the musl libc. > At some point in the future, when we have things looking good, we can > contribute that back to the official Gentoo musl overlay. Ideally, > that would be the main Gentoo package

Re: [gentoo-dev] Gcc 6 and Gcc 5 update

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 On 11/12/16 11:59, Magnus Granberg wrote: > Hi > > Gcc 6.X update: Gcc 6.3 will soon get released in one or two weeks > on that the pie use flag will get unmasked and gcj will be masked > for java is removed in gcc 7 Package that fail with the pie

Re: [gentoo-dev] Gentoo Staffing Needs page is out of date

Hans de Graaff: > On Sun, 2016-12-11 at 17:17 +, Gokturk Yuksek wrote: >> >> r...@gentoo.org >> >> Ruby core package maintainer: >> https://wiki.gentoo.org/wiki/Project:Gentoo/Staffing_Needs/Ruby_core_ >> package_maintainer >> >> Ruby package maintainer: >>

Re: [gentoo-dev] Gcc 6 and Gcc 5 update

On Sun, Dec 11, 2016 at 06:59:17PM +0100, Magnus Granberg wrote > Hi > > Gcc 6.X update: > Gcc 6.3 will soon get released in one or two weeks on that the > pie use flag will get unmasked and gcj will be masked for java is > removed in gcc 7 Package that fail with the pie flag needed to get >

Re: [gentoo-dev] Gentoo Staffing Needs page is out of date

On Sun, 2016-12-11 at 17:17 +, Gokturk Yuksek wrote: >  > r...@gentoo.org > > Ruby core package maintainer: > https://wiki.gentoo.org/wiki/Project:Gentoo/Staffing_Needs/Ruby_core_ > package_maintainer > > Ruby package maintainer: >

Re: [gentoo-dev] Gcc 6 and Gcc 5 update

On Sun, 11 Dec 2016 18:59:17 +0100 Magnus Granberg wrote: > Gcc 6.3 will soon get released in one or two weeks on that the pie use flag > will get unmasked and gcj will be masked for java is removed in gcc 7 I'm hoping you mean gcj will only be masked for new versions going

[gentoo-dev] Gcc 6 and Gcc 5 update

Hi Gcc 6.X update: Gcc 6.3 will soon get released in one or two weeks on that the pie use flag will get unmasked and gcj will be masked for java is removed in gcc 7 Package that fail with the pie flag needed to get fixed upstream for we are not the only dist that use it now days. Gcc 5.X update

Re: [gentoo-dev] gpg: signing failed: Inappropriate ioctl for device

On 12/11/2016 03:13 PM, gro...@gentoo.org wrote: > gpg: signing failed: Inappropriate ioctl for device this might indicate a want for export GPG_TTY=$(tty) -- Kristian Fiskerstrand OpenPGP keyblock reachable at hkp://pool.sks-keyservers.net fpr:94CB AFDD 3034 5109 5618 35AA 0B7F 8B60 E3ED FAE3

Re: [gentoo-dev] Gentoo Staffing Needs page is out of date

Gokturk Yuksek: > Hi all, > > The Staffing Needs page on the wiki [0] seems a little out of date, > there are still mentions of "herds". I invite project leads and > members to update it. We added a reference to it in the Mentors wiki > page [1] and hoping to get more attention to it. > >

[gentoo-dev][eselect][PATCH v1] add powerpc64le arch support * libs/package-manager.bash.in (arch()) fix can't determine architecture in powerpc64le

Signed-off-by: Leno Hou --- libs/package-manager.bash.in | 1 + 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+) diff --git a/libs/package-manager.bash.in b/libs/package-manager.bash.in index aececfd..621f6ac 100644 --- a/libs/package-manager.bash.in +++ b/libs/package-manager.bash.in @@ -80,6

[gentoo-dev] Ada project needs your help!

Hello, everyone. The Ada project seriously needs help. For some time already, it has no active developers (George is retiring), and a lot of bugs needing attention. The packages maintained by aga@g.o are: app-eselect/eselect-gnat dev-ada/asis-gcc dev-ada/charles dev-lang/gnat-gcc virtual/ada

Re: [gentoo-dev] gpg: signing failed: Inappropriate ioctl for device

On 2016-12-11 15:13, gro...@gentoo.org wrote: > But this commit sits in my copy of the tree, and I cannot > push it. What can I do? You can't push because the commit isn't signed? If it is the last commit, just run `git commit --amend -S` If it isn't the last commit, try `git log` to get the

[gentoo-dev] gpg: signing failed: Inappropriate ioctl for device

Hello *, Today, when trying to push my commit to the repo, I got gpg: signing failed: Inappropriate ioctl for device gpg: signing failed: Inappropriate ioctl for device error: gpg failed to sign the data fatal: failed to sign the push certificate fatal: The remote end hung up unexpectedly When

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Cross Post due to technical component - Thanks for all the fish

On 12/11/2016 10:49 AM, Daniel Campbell wrote: > On 12/11/2016 02:00 AM, Markos Chandras wrote: >> On 12/11/2016 08:05 AM, Daniel Campbell wrote: >>> On 12/07/2016 07:36 AM, Jorge Manuel B. S. Vicetto wrote: On Wed, 7 Dec 2016, Jorge Manuel B. S. Vicetto wrote: > I'm

Re: [gentoo-dev] tinfo flag

On 12/07/2016 07:27 AM, Ian Stakenvicius wrote: > On 07/12/16 05:40 AM, konsolebox wrote: >> On Wed, Dec 7, 2016 at 5:16 PM, Michał Górny wrote: >>> On Wed, 7 Dec 2016 16:16:45 +0800 >>> konsolebox wrote: >>> On Wed, Dec 7, 2016 at 1:23 PM, Michał

Re: [gentoo-dev] rdp vs rdesktop vs freerdp USE flags

On 12/08/2016 06:10 AM, Doug Freed wrote: > On Thu, Dec 8, 2016 at 7:38 AM, Andrew Savchenko wrote: >> Hi, >> >> On Thu, 08 Dec 2016 11:29:51 +0100 Pacho Ramos wrote: >>> When looking at freerdp reverse deps I noticed we are using three different >>> names for USE flags

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Cross Post due to technical component - Thanks for all the fish

On 12/11/2016 02:00 AM, Markos Chandras wrote: > On 12/11/2016 08:05 AM, Daniel Campbell wrote: >> On 12/07/2016 07:36 AM, Jorge Manuel B. S. Vicetto wrote: >>> On Wed, 7 Dec 2016, Jorge Manuel B. S. Vicetto wrote: >>> >>> >>> I'm asking recuiters directly, but unless someone changed the

[gentoo-dev] Last rites: sys-power/powerman

# Markos Chandras (11 Dec 2016) # Dead upstream, no maintainer and it hasn't been bumped # since 2013. Masking for removal in 30 days (wrt bug #489878) sys-power/powerman -- Regards, Markos Chandras

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Cross Post due to technical component - Thanks for all the fish

On 12/11/2016 08:05 AM, Daniel Campbell wrote: > On 12/07/2016 07:36 AM, Jorge Manuel B. S. Vicetto wrote: >> On Wed, 7 Dec 2016, Jorge Manuel B. S. Vicetto wrote: >> >> >> >>> I'm asking recuiters directly, but unless someone changed the rules >>> and I was distracted, irc is not mandatory. >>

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Cross Post due to technical component - Thanks for all the fish

On 12/09/2016 09:46 PM, Christopher Head wrote: > On Wed, 7 Dec 2016 12:15:06 -0500 > james wrote: > >> Being able to use stage-4 or stage-5 (G. forums) installs to rapidly >> provision a collection of bare-metal systems [BGO-593218] into a wide >> variety of hardened

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Cross Post due to technical component - Thanks for all the fish

On 12/07/2016 07:36 AM, Jorge Manuel B. S. Vicetto wrote: > On Wed, 7 Dec 2016, Jorge Manuel B. S. Vicetto wrote: > > > >> I'm asking recuiters directly, but unless someone changed the rules >> and I was distracted, irc is not mandatory. > > I've got confirmation that nothing has changed, so