[gentoo-dev] [PATCH] distutils-r1.eclass: Namespace & doc _clean_egg_info

2017-05-05 Thread Michał Górny
Prefix the _clean_egg_info function with an appropriate namespace, and document its purpose with eclassdoc format. Be more verbose on the exact problem being solved; remove URL to old upstream bug tracker that no longer exists. --- eclass/distutils-r1.eclass | 14 +- 1 file changed, 9

Re: [gentoo-dev] [PATCH] distutils-r1.eclass: Warn if *-nspkg.pth files are installed

2017-05-05 Thread M. J. Everitt
On 05/05/17 22:14, Michał Górny wrote: > Add a check for *-nspkg.pth files indicating implicit setuptools > namespace hack. While they kept namespaces somewhat working without > requiring explicit support in ebuilds, they were unreliable. They > frequently required additional hacks (distutils_insta

[gentoo-dev] [PATCH] distutils-r1.eclass: Warn if *-nspkg.pth files are installed

2017-05-05 Thread Michał Górny
Add a check for *-nspkg.pth files indicating implicit setuptools namespace hack. While they kept namespaces somewhat working without requiring explicit support in ebuilds, they were unreliable. They frequently required additional hacks (distutils_install_for_testing) to get the tests working, and t

Re: [gentoo-dev] OT Copyright -> meson.eclass third draft

2017-05-05 Thread Erik Närström
I'am far from a legal scholar, i do know that one of the main driver behind extending the copyright to death of author +70yrs was so Disney would continue to control miky mouse, or atlest tahat is the folk lore on the topic. So that make it seem like even if gentoo owns the material they only do so

Re: [gentoo-dev] meson.eclass third draft

2017-05-05 Thread Erik Närström
Ok, that makes sense. Are from sweden where you can't give up copyright, so didn't even think considerd that it wasn't tied to a person. Thanks /EKG On 5 May 2017 20:33, "William L. Thomson Jr." wrote: > On Fri, 5 May 2017 18:20:43 + > Erik Närström wrote: > > > I'snt copyright deth of au

Re: [gentoo-dev] OT Copyright -> meson.eclass third draft

2017-05-05 Thread William L. Thomson Jr.
On Fri, 5 May 2017 14:31:17 -0400 "William L. Thomson Jr." wrote: > On Fri, 5 May 2017 18:20:43 + > Erik Närström wrote: > > > I'snt copyright deth of author +70yrs? > > Yes for work that is copyright to say you or me. Something copyright > to an immortal entity I believe is different. E

Re: [gentoo-dev] meson.eclass third draft

2017-05-05 Thread William L. Thomson Jr.
On Fri, 5 May 2017 14:05:38 -0400 "William L. Thomson Jr." wrote: > That means if you author something in 2017, and put down say > 1999-2017. You are starting at 1999, and not 2017. Losing 16 years Er 18 back to 1st grade... -- William L. Thomson Jr. pgpuBuutCVu7b.pgp Description: OpenPG

Re: [gentoo-dev] meson.eclass third draft

2017-05-05 Thread William L. Thomson Jr.
On Fri, 5 May 2017 18:20:43 + Erik Närström wrote: > I'snt copyright deth of author +70yrs? Yes for work that is copyright to say you or me. Something copyright to an immortal entity I believe is different. Even if Gentoo ended, not sure that is the same as a person dying. We essential give

Re: [gentoo-dev] meson.eclass third draft

2017-05-05 Thread Erik Närström
I'snt copyright deth of author +70yrs? On 5 May 2017 20:06, "William L. Thomson Jr." wrote: > On Fri, 5 May 2017 13:18:58 -0400 > "William L. Thomson Jr." wrote: > > > On Fri, 05 May 2017 18:55:41 +0200 > > Michał Górny wrote: > > > > > On pią, 2017-05-05 at 10:35 -0500, William Hubbs wrote: >

Re: [gentoo-dev] meson.eclass third draft

2017-05-05 Thread William L. Thomson Jr.
On Fri, 5 May 2017 13:18:58 -0400 "William L. Thomson Jr." wrote: > On Fri, 05 May 2017 18:55:41 +0200 > Michał Górny wrote: > > > On pią, 2017-05-05 at 10:35 -0500, William Hubbs wrote: > > > # Copyright 2017 Gentoo Foundation > > > > Aren't we supposed to use the full range of years he

Re: [gentoo-dev] meson.eclass third draft

2017-05-05 Thread William L. Thomson Jr.
On Fri, 05 May 2017 18:55:41 +0200 Michał Górny wrote: > On pią, 2017-05-05 at 10:35 -0500, William Hubbs wrote: > > # Copyright 2017 Gentoo Foundation > > Aren't we supposed to use the full range of years here? It applies when something comes into existing. If this eclass did not exist in 20

Re: [gentoo-dev] meson.eclass third draft

2017-05-05 Thread Michał Górny
On pią, 2017-05-05 at 10:35 -0500, William Hubbs wrote: > # Copyright 2017 Gentoo Foundation Aren't we supposed to use the full range of years here? > # Distributed under the terms of the GNU General Public License v2 > > # @ECLASS: meson.eclass > # @MAINTAINER: > # William Hubbs > # @BLURB: co

Re: [gentoo-dev] meson.eclass third draft

2017-05-05 Thread William Hubbs
On Fri, May 05, 2017 at 12:24:03PM -0400, Mike Gilbert wrote: > On Fri, May 5, 2017 at 11:35 AM, William Hubbs wrote: > > All, > > > > here is the third (and hopefully final) draft of meson.eclass. I am > > leaving the code in for the cross support but commented so all I need to > > do later is ad

Re: [gentoo-dev] meson.eclass third draft

2017-05-05 Thread Mike Gilbert
On Fri, May 5, 2017 at 11:35 AM, William Hubbs wrote: > All, > > here is the third (and hopefully final) draft of meson.eclass. I am > leaving the code in for the cross support but commented so all I need to > do later is add toolchain-funcs back to inherit and uncomment the code > once I know how

[gentoo-dev] meson.eclass third draft

2017-05-05 Thread William Hubbs
All, here is the third (and hopefully final) draft of meson.eclass. I am leaving the code in for the cross support but commented so all I need to do later is add toolchain-funcs back to inherit and uncomment the code once I know how to write the cross file, which shouldn't take too long. I added a