[gentoo-dev] Re: RFC v2: news item for the 17.0 profiles

Andreas K. Huettel posted on Fri, 13 Oct 2017 00:51:23 +0200 as excerpted: > Am Mittwoch, 11. Oktober 2017, 06:24:44 CEST schrieb Alec Warner: >> >> "Please upgrade away from the 13.0 profiles in the next six weeks." >> >> > Good idea. Here's what I wrote: > > Please upgrade away from the

Re: [gentoo-dev] FEATURES=splitdebug and debugedit

On 12/10/17 22:24, Francesco Riosa wrote: > hi, > > FEATURES=splitdebug at the moment require package dev-util/debugedit > which is a lagging behind upstream. > However package app-arch/rpm (from which debugedit is forked) always > install the same binary in ${ROOT}/usr/libexec/rpm/debugedit.

Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC v2: news item for the 17.0 profiles

Am Mittwoch, 11. Oktober 2017, 18:45:37 CEST schrieb Robin H. Johnson: > On Wed, Oct 11, 2017 at 08:10:02AM -0400, Aaron W. Swenson wrote: > > Some of these can take a while. Maybe we want to spell it out: > > > > for p in sys-devel/gcc:6.4.0 sys-devel/binutils sys-libs/glibc; do > > emerge -1 $p

Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC v2: news item for the 17.0 profiles

Am Mittwoch, 11. Oktober 2017, 06:41:06 CEST schrieb Walter Dnes: > > 1) Will 6.3.0 be skipped for stabilization? Yes. (Actually I'd prefer to drop it yesterday, but didn't manage to wake up enough toolchain team members for that.) > > 2) If someone decides to override and set "-pie" in

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: RFC v2: news item for the 17.0 profiles

Am Mittwoch, 11. Oktober 2017, 06:24:44 CEST schrieb Alec Warner: > > "Please upgrade away from the 13.0 profiles in the next six weeks." > Good idea. Here's what I wrote: Please upgrade away from the 13.0 profiles within the six weeks after GCC 6.4.0 has been stabilized on your architecture.

[gentoo-dev] FEATURES=splitdebug and debugedit

hi,     FEATURES=splitdebug at the moment require package dev-util/debugedit which is a lagging behind upstream. However package app-arch/rpm (from which debugedit is forked) always install the same binary in ${ROOT}/usr/libexec/rpm/debugedit. In 2017 I don't see much value in maintaining a fork

[gentoo-portage-dev] FEATURES=splitdebug and debugedit

hi,     FEATURES=splitdebug at the moment require package dev-util/debugedit which is a lagging behind upstream. However package app-arch/rpm (from which debugedit is forked) always install the same binary in ${ROOT}/usr/libexec/rpm/debugedit. In 2017 I don't see much value in maintaining a fork

Re: [gentoo-dev] newsitem: openrc 0.33 "service" binary removal

All, if there are no objections to this, I would like to publish the newsitem tomorrow and release OpenRC 0.33 at the same time. If I do not see any responses by 24 hours from now I will do so. Thanks, William signature.asc Description: Digital signature

[gentoo-dev] newsitem: openrc 0.33 "service" binary removal

All, OpenRC 0.33 will remove the "service" binary, which is currently a copy of the "rc-service" binary. The reason for this is that "service" will be provided by sys-apps/init-system-helpers. Here is the news item: Thanks, William Title: OpenRC "service" binary removal Author: William Hubbs

Re: [gentoo-dev] Checking if a package respects LDFLAGS

On Sun, 01 Oct 2017 09:02:19 +0200 Michał Górny wrote: > W dniu sob, 30.09.2017 o godzinie 21∶49 +, użytkownik Robin H. > Johnson napisał: > > On Sat, Sep 30, 2017 at 08:05:50PM +0200, Andreas K. Huettel wrote: > > > Am Samstag, 30. September 2017, 19:03:59 CEST schrieb

[gentoo-dev] Re: pkg_rm_pretend?

Kent Fredric posted on Thu, 12 Oct 2017 05:20:24 +1300 as excerpted: > This is especially annoying as: > > 1. Its very easy to overlook one package in a 400 package depclean > notice. Wow. How'd you ever get a backlog of 400 packages in your depclean list, including critical ones you know you

[gentoo-dev] Re: RFC: news item for the 17.0 profiles

Duncan posted on Wed, 11 Oct 2017 03:31:55 + as excerpted: > Andreas K. Huettel posted on Tue, 10 Oct 2017 21:02:32 +0200 as > excerpted: > >> Switching the profile changes the settings for building gcc (it >> switches a use-flag from forced-off to forced-on). A gcc-6 built with >> the 17.0

Re: [gentoo-dev] GLEP 66 [git workflow] for another review round

W dniu śro, 11.10.2017 o godzinie 18∶33 -0400, użytkownik Mike Pagano napisał: > On 10/11/2017 05:19 PM, Michał Górny wrote: > > Hi, > > snip > > > - ``Reported-by: Full Name `` — usually indicates > > full review, > > snip > > Hi, > > Is that was Reported-by usually