Re: [gentoo-dev] glibc 2.16/19 for Gentoo Prefix on antique kernels

On Sun, Feb 25, 2018 at 10:10:26AM +0100, Michał Górny wrote: > W dniu nie, 25.02.2018 o godzinie 15∶17 +0900, użytkownik Benda Xu > napisał: > > Hi all, > > > > Yes, it's 2018. But there are still RHEL 4 and 5 systems running > > antique kernels such as 2.6.8 and 2.6.18. In my experience, many

Re: [gentoo-dev] glibc 2.16/19 for Gentoo Prefix on antique kernels

On Mon, Feb 26, 2018 at 12:22 PM, William Hubbs wrote: > On Sun, Feb 25, 2018 at 10:10:26AM +0100, Michał Górny wrote: > > W dniu nie, 25.02.2018 o godzinie 15∶17 +0900, użytkownik Benda Xu > > napisał: > > > Hi all, > > > > > > Yes, it's 2018. But there are still RHEL 4 and 5 systems running >

Re: [gentoo-dev] glibc 2.16/19 for Gentoo Prefix on antique kernels

Am Sonntag, 25. Februar 2018, 07:17:47 CET schrieb Benda Xu: > Hi all, > > Yes, it's 2018. But there are still RHEL 4 and 5 systems running > antique kernels such as 2.6.8 and 2.6.18. In my experience, many of > them are data acquisition hubs or computing clusters. No administrator > cares abou

Re: [gentoo-dev] glibc 2.16/19 for Gentoo Prefix on antique kernels

W dniu nie, 25.02.2018 o godzinie 19∶31 +0900, użytkownik Benda Xu napisał: > Hi Michał, > > Michał Górny writes: > > > I don't think this is the first old version Prefix team needs keeping. > > Another example are old versions of LLVM. > > I am sure you are aware that Prefix has two variants:

[gentoo-dev] [PATCH 1/5] use.desc: Introduce 'luajit' as a global flag

'luajit' is used consistently in 25+ packages. Make it a global flag. --- profiles/use.desc | 1 + 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+) diff --git a/profiles/use.desc b/profiles/use.desc index 5cdf9808d2b6..5bf9a1d7f693 100644 --- a/profiles/use.desc +++ b/profiles/use.desc @@ -186,6 +186,7 @@ lirc - A

[gentoo-dev] [PATCH 2/5] */*: Remove redundant local descriptions for USE=luajit

--- app-editors/gvim/metadata.xml | 1 - app-editors/neovim/metadata.xml | 2 -- app-editors/vim/metadata.xml| 1 - app-shells/mpv-bash-completion/metadata.xml | 3 --- dev-db/redis/metadata.xml | 1 - dev-lua/lpeg/metadata.xml

[gentoo-dev] [PATCH 3/5] net-analyzer/suricata: [QA] Use standard meaning of USE=luajit

Fix the package to use standard meaning for USE=luajit instead of making it exclusive with USE=lua. --- net-analyzer/suricata/metadata.xml | 1 - net-analyzer/suricata/suricata-4.0.3.ebuild | 21 + 2 files changed, 13 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-) diff --git a/net-an

[gentoo-dev] [PATCH 4/5] net-dns/pdns: [QA] Use standard meaning of USE=luajit

Fix the package to use standard meaning for USE=luajit instead of making it exclusive with USE=lua. --- net-dns/pdns/metadata.xml | 1 - net-dns/pdns/pdns-4.0.5.ebuild | 12 +++- net-dns/pdns/pdns-4.1.0.ebuild | 12 +++- net-dns/pdns/pdns-4.1.1.ebuild | 12 +++- 4 fil

[gentoo-dev] [PATCH 5/5] dev-libs/libpeas: USE=jit -> USE=luajit

Closes: https://bugs.gentoo.org/648188 --- dev-libs/libpeas/libpeas-1.20.0-r1.ebuild | 8 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) diff --git a/dev-libs/libpeas/libpeas-1.20.0-r1.ebuild b/dev-libs/libpeas/libpeas-1.20.0-r1.ebuild index 71803c6cb7fe..ead15aa6969b 100644 --- a/dev-

Re: [gentoo-dev] details on the PMS

Hi Michael Saturday 24 Feb 2018 02:48:02, Michael Lienhardt wrote : > I noticed that the following files are not mentioned, or stated optional in > the PMS: > - profiles/repo_name > - metadata/layout.conf > > It seems to me that without these files, portage complains. Shouldn't them be > de

Re: [gentoo-dev] details on the PMS

On Fri, Feb 23, 2018 at 8:48 PM, Michael Lienhardt < michael.lienha...@laposte.net> wrote: > I noticed that the following files are not mentioned, or stated optional > in the PMS: > - profiles/repo_name > - metadata/layout.conf > > It seems to me that without these files, portage complains. Shou