Hello,
Some aspects of the current design of python-single-r1 are gross hack.
I'd like to discuss potential alternatives to them.
Preamble
For the purpose of this mail, let's establish two terms.
'Single' will refer to packages allowing the user to select 1 out of N
supported Python
No ebuilds calling these functions in EAPIs 0 to 2 are left in the tree.
Signed-off-by: Ulrich Müller
---
eclass/eutils.eclass | 49 +---
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 48 deletions(-)
diff --git a/eclass/eutils.eclass b/eclass/eutils.eclass
index
It isn't (and never was) used by anything else in the tree. Inline its
only usage in evar_pop() and drop the function.
---
eclass/estack.eclass | 15 ++-
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)
diff --git a/eclass/estack.eclass b/eclass/estack.eclass
index
Calling "eshopts_push; eshopts_pop" makes Portage report a QA issue:
* QA Notice: Global shell options changed and were not restored while calling
'src_prepare'
This is caused by some side effect, by which restoring the noglob
option disables the expand_aliases option. Work around the problem
by
On Sat, 23 Nov 2019 09:16:42 +0100
Alfredo Tupone wrote:
> I would like to have comments about the followinf changes.
> I "fear" the shopts nullglob a little
>
> diff --git a/eclass/toolchain.eclass b/eclass/toolchain.eclass
> index a3081c38bac1..aca10b4f37ed 100644
> ---
I would like to have comments about the followinf changes.
I "fear" the shopts nullglob a little
diff --git a/eclass/toolchain.eclass b/eclass/toolchain.eclass
index a3081c38bac1..aca10b4f37ed 100644
--- a/eclass/toolchain.eclass
+++ b/eclass/toolchain.eclass
@@ -1817,33 +1817,37 @@
