Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] Moving more architectures to ~arch only

2021-10-15 Thread Agostino Sarubbo
On giovedì 14 ottobre 2021 15:40:02 CEST Marek Szuba wrote: > WDYT? I agree for arches that have exotic hardware but I'd keep x86 since testing can be done on amd64 via 32bit chroot. On the other hand I'm pretty sure we have few x86 users so, sooner or later, x86 will go into ~arch as well. Ago

Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] Moving more architectures to ~arch only

2021-10-15 Thread Mikhail Koliada
On 14.10.2021 16:40, Marek Szuba wrote: Dear everyone, Following some private discussions, I feel quite strongly now that it would both considerably improve certain processes and make our use of limited manpower more efficient were we to further reduce the number of stable arches in Gentoo

[gentoo-dev] Help with "unrecognized ELF files" needed

2021-10-15 Thread xgqt
Hi! I'm having a problem with guile packages and portage QA checks. Guile puts the compiled bytecode into the /usr/lib64 directory which produces a portage warning that unrecognized ELF files are being installed. Example bug reports: https://bugs.gentoo.org/727146 https://bugs.gentoo.org/81723

Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] Moving more architectures to ~arch only

2021-10-15 Thread Rolf Eike Beer
Am Donnerstag, 14. Oktober 2021, 15:40:02 CEST schrieb Marek Szuba: > Dear everyone, > > Following some private discussions, I feel quite strongly now that it > would both considerably improve certain processes and make our use of > limited manpower more efficient were we to further reduce the num

Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] Moving more architectures to ~arch only

2021-10-15 Thread Michał Górny
On Fri, 2021-10-15 at 23:40 +0200, Rolf Eike Beer wrote: > We have already removed many stable packages from hppa, just to reduce the > amount of work. If sparc really becomes a problem I suspect that dropping > most > of the multimedia or whatever stuff there could also reduce the amount of >