Signed-off-by: Mike Gilbert
---
.../2021-10-24-netifrc-dhcp-client.en.txt | 21 +++
1 file changed, 21 insertions(+)
create mode 100644
2021-10-24-netifrc-dhcp-client/2021-10-24-netifrc-dhcp-client.en.txt
diff --git
a/2021-10-24-netifrc-dhcp-client/2021-10-24-netifrc-dhcp-
Hi all!
Both
dev-util/pycharm-professional
dev-util/pycharm-community
are for grabs now as I have changed the IDE and this is unfair to
prevent others from contributing and maintaining these two packages.
# Jakov Smolić (2021-10-21)
# Dead upstream, EAPI 5, broken build system, no revdeps.
# Removal on 2021-11-20. Bug #819366
net-analyzer/quidscor
--
Jakov
OpenPGP_signature
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
# Jakov Smolić (2021-10-21)
# No maintainer, no revdeps, dead upstream, EAPI 5.
# No other distro is packaging this.
# Removal on 2021-11-20. Bug #819363
net-dialup/cistronradius
--
Jakov
OpenPGP_signature
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
# Jakov Smolić (2021-10-21)
# No maintainer, no revdeps, dead upstream, EAPI 5.
# No other distro is packaging this.
# Removal on 2021-11-20. Bug #819354
net-dialup/fbgetty
--
Jakov
OpenPGP_signature
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
# Jakov Smolić (2021-10-21)
# Legacy package, no revdeps, EAPI 5.
# Removal on 2021-11-20. Bug #819345
net-fs/openafs-legacy
--
Jakov
OpenPGP_signature
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
# Jakov Smolić (2021-10-21)
# No maintainer, dead upstream, EAPI 5.
# No other distro is packaging this. Bug #819339
# Removal on 2021-11-20.
net-ftp/profxp
--
Jakov
OpenPGP_signature
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
On Thu, Oct 21, 2021 at 10:05:20AM +0200, Micha=C5=82 G=C3=B3rny wrote:
> Hello,
>=20
> Splitting from the discussion in [1] (moving more arhitectures to
> ~arch), I'd like to propose that we remove the "security supported"
> architecture list from [2] and instead level security support with
> the
# Jakov Smolić (2021-10-21)
# No maintainer, dead upstream, EAPI 5.
# No other distro is packaging this. Bug #819231
# Removal on 2021-11-20.
sys-auth/ykneo-ccid-tools
--
Jakov
OpenPGP_signature
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
This allows the buildtype option to be overridden or omitted.
This may be necessary if an ebuild makes use of the 'debug' built-in
option control project-specific debug functionality. meson emits a
warning if both buildtype and debug are specified, since the former
overrides the latter.
See discu
On Thu, Oct 21, 2021 at 4:05 AM Michał Górny wrote:
> 4. In the end, Security team isn't really respecting this policy.
> In the end, this leads to absurdities like GLSA being released before
> a package is stable on amd64, and confusing the users [4].
This is certainly an absurd mistake, but I t
# Jakov Smolić (2021-10-21)
# No maintainer, dead upstream, EAPI 5.
# No other distro is packaging this. Bug #819171
# Removal on 2021-11-20.
x11-apps/xwarppointer
--
Jakov
OpenPGP_signature
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
# Jakov Smolić (2021-10-21)
# No maintainer, EAPI 5, no other distro is packaging this.
# Removal on 2021-11-20. Bug #819165
x11-misc/3dfb
--
Jakov
OpenPGP_signature
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
# Jakov Smolić (2021-10-21)
# Unmaintained, stuck on EAPI 5, full of hacks and patches.
# No other distro is packaging this. Bug #819141
# Removal on 2021-11-20.
x11-themes/redhat-artwork
--
Jakov
OpenPGP_signature
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
# Jakov Smolić (2021-10-21)
# No maintainer, EAPI 5, no other distro is packaging this.
# Removal on 2021-11-20. Bug #819126
sci-geosciences/swmm
--
Jakov
OpenPGP_signature
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
# Jakov Smolić (2021-10-21)
# No maintainer, EAPI 5, no other distro is packaging this.
# Removal on 2021-11-20. Bug #819123
sci-geosciences/harmonics-dwf-free-noncomm
--
Jakov
OpenPGP_signature
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
# Jakov Smolić (2021-10-21)
# Stuck on EAPI 5, no other distro is packaging this. Bug #575684
# Removal on 2021-11-20.
sci-electronics/quartus-prime-lite
--
Jakov
OpenPGP_signature
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Hi Michał,
I do agree with the gist of what you're saying, and in absence of a
better solution I'm in support.
I also make a disclaimer: I only use amd64 so none of this really
affects me, so at the end of the day - I don't really care.
We have tinderboxes already running that does all kinds of
Hello,
Splitting from the discussion in [1] (moving more arhitectures to
~arch), I'd like to propose that we remove the "security supported"
architecture list from [2] and instead level security support with
the general architecture support in Gentoo, e.g. by having all
architectures with stable p
19 matches
Mail list logo