Re: [gentoo-dev] [PATCH v2] go-module.eclass: deprecate EGO_SUM and call ego instead of go

2022-03-03 Thread William Hubbs
On Fri, Mar 04, 2022 at 12:01:42AM +, Sam James wrote: > > > > On 4 Mar 2022, at 00:00, William Hubbs wrote: > > > > On Wed, Mar 02, 2022 at 09:32:14PM +0500, Anna Vyalkova wrote: > >> On 2022-03-01 15:55, William Hubbs wrote: > >>> I am willing to flag EGO_SUM as deprecated if a variable c

Re: [gentoo-dev] [PATCH 0/1] Add 'notes' element to metadata.xml (GLEP 68)

2022-03-03 Thread Ionen Wolkens
On Tue, Oct 05, 2021 at 02:21:22PM -0700, Alec Warner wrote: > I'd argue we can add NOTES.md to packages (e.g. allow those files.) > Then we modify packages.gentoo.org to render the markdown; or users > can render locally or read unrendered. > > WDYT? Given this topic came up again on IRC, late r

Re: [gentoo-dev] [PATCH v2] go-module.eclass: deprecate EGO_SUM and call ego instead of go

2022-03-03 Thread Sam James
> On 4 Mar 2022, at 00:00, William Hubbs wrote: > > On Wed, Mar 02, 2022 at 09:32:14PM +0500, Anna Vyalkova wrote: >> On 2022-03-01 15:55, William Hubbs wrote: >>> I am willing to flag EGO_SUM as deprecated if a variable can be flagged >>> as deprecated; that is what I'm looking up now. >> >>

Re: [gentoo-dev] [PATCH v2] go-module.eclass: deprecate EGO_SUM and call ego instead of go

2022-03-03 Thread William Hubbs
On Wed, Mar 02, 2022 at 09:32:14PM +0500, Anna Vyalkova wrote: > On 2022-03-01 15:55, William Hubbs wrote: > > I am willing to flag EGO_SUM as deprecated if a variable can be flagged > > as deprecated; that is what I'm looking up now. > > EGO_SUM is often the only choice for overlays, so consider