I don't really have any strong opinion, but I'll note this was
discussed here last year, too:
https://archives.gentoo.org/gentoo-dev/message/a51ef62765b577dccfde67d5d2d727ae
On Tue, Apr 05, 2022 at 01:41:50AM +0200, Jason A. Donenfeld wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'd like to propose the following for
Hi,
I'd like to propose the following for portage:
- Only support one "secure" hash function (such as sha2, sha3, blake2, etc)
- Only generate and parse one hash function in Manifest files
- Remove support for multiple hash functions
In other words, what are we actually getting by having _both_
Hi!
I'm the only maintainer left within the Gentoo Vim Project [1] and would need
some help to maintain the vim editor along with the app-vim/ category.
vim and vim packages are low-maintenance: a version bump here, a security fix
there. vim ebuilds aren't that complicated. vim eclasses have to
# Volkmar W. Pogatzki (2022-04-03)
# Java library without consumers.
# Multiple vulnerabilities (bug #719146).
# Removal in 30 days.
dev-java/log4j
- Flow
Ühel kenal päeval, P, 03.04.2022 kell 21:22, kirjutas Matt Turner:
> These are all assigned to gnome@, but I don't use any of these, so I
> can't
> really test them. Please take them if you use them.
>
> They all need minor version bumps, and some have outstanding bugs and
> GitHub
> pull
