On 4/23/22 20:16, WANG Xuerui wrote:
Hi,
In order to support building for LoongArch in ::gentoo while some of the
necessary bits are not upstreamed yet, recently it was discussed in
#gentoo-toolchain that a new USE flag "experimental-loong" is to be
added, force-masked on every ARCH except loon
On Sat, Apr 23, 2022 at 03:49:32PM +0300, Joonas Niilola wrote:
> On 15.4.2022 4.38, John Helmert III wrote:
> > Hi all! Currently all security bugs are assigned to security@g.o,
> > always. This can easily lead to some confusion about who needs to do
> > something about a given bug; right now this
On 4/23/22 21:58, Joonas Niilola wrote:
On 18.4.2022 7.47, WANG Xuerui wrote:
Of course I forgot to mention the devbox situation... The single box I
currently use is placed in my company, so I probably wouldn't be able to
share it. I have ordered another board though, so I'll be able to
provisi
Switch the distutils-r1.eclass to gpep517 code branches unconditionally.
Signed-off-by: Michał Górny
---
eclass/distutils-r1.eclass | 84 +++---
1 file changed, 15 insertions(+), 69 deletions(-)
diff --git a/eclass/distutils-r1.eclass b/eclass/distutils-r1.eclass
On 18.4.2022 7.47, WANG Xuerui wrote:
> Of course I forgot to mention the devbox situation... The single box I
> currently use is placed in my company, so I probably wouldn't be able to
> share it. I have ordered another board though, so I'll be able to
> provision it as a devbox after receiving it
On 15.4.2022 4.38, John Helmert III wrote:
> Hi all! Currently all security bugs are assigned to security@g.o,
> always. This can easily lead to some confusion about who needs to do
> something about a given bug; right now this is generally tracked by
> whiteboard magic strings that probably not ma
LAKE2B
193bc4a3147e147d5529956164ec4912fad5d5c6fb07f909ff1056e57235834173194afc686993ccd785c1ff15804de0961b625f3008cca0e27493efc8f27b13
SHA512
9f60f77e8ab972b9438ac648bed17551c8491d6585a5e85f694b2eaa4c623fbc61eb18419b2656b6795eac5deec0edaa04547fc6723fbda52256bd7f3486898f
+DIST linux-loongarch-next-on-5.17-20220423.tar.xz 177296 B
Signed-off-by: WANG Xuerui
---
profiles/arch/base/package.use.mask | 8
1 file changed, 8 insertions(+)
diff --git a/profiles/arch/base/package.use.mask
b/profiles/arch/base/package.use.mask
index 4683e58f9b8a..463227f1989c 100644
--- a/profiles/arch/base/package.use.mask
+++ b/profile
Hi,
In order to support building for LoongArch in ::gentoo while some of the
necessary bits are not upstreamed yet, recently it was discussed in
#gentoo-toolchain that a new USE flag "experimental-loong" is to be
added, force-masked on every ARCH except loong, that would bring the
LoongArch patchs
> On Sat, 23 Apr 2022, Arthur Zamarin wrote:
> The first flow I want to introduce is when nattka sees a bug with
> CC-ARCHES in keyword, but not all maintainers were CC, nattka will CC
> all maintainers, drop the CC-ARCHES, and comment something a long the
> lines "wait for maintainers to ACK
Hi All!
As a result of a premature stabilization CC-ARCHES without
acknowledgments from maintainers on a bug in last week, and after leio
suggested on IRC a change of flows, I want to suggest multiple ideas and
get your responses and comments.
As some background, we have a tool called nattka [1],
# Volkmar W. Pogatzki (2022-04-22)
# Unused java library. Removal on 2022-05-24.
dev-java/jgraph
- Flow
On 4/23/22 14:25, Michał Górny wrote:
On Sat, 2022-04-23 at 13:15 +0800, WANG Xuerui wrote:
Signed-off-by: WANG Xuerui
---
eclass/kernel-2.eclass | 2 ++
profiles/arch/base/package.use.mask | 1 +
2 files changed, 3 insertions(+)
diff --git a/eclass/kernel-2.eclass b/eclass/k
13 matches
Mail list logo
