It's low maintenance; only thing needed is either to rebase to my
libtransform work, or add proper xz support.
Either way, any questions, let me know.
~brian
On Mon, Jun 17, 2013 at 1:16 AM, Sergey Popov wrote:
> 16.06.2013 13:49, Pacho Ramos пишет:
> > Due ferringb retirement the following pa
On Tue, Nov 06, 2012 at 12:31:07PM -0500, Mike Gilbert wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 5, 2012 at 7:48 PM, Brian Harring wrote:
> > Either way, I'm honestly not trying to piss folks off here nor stop
> > the efforts to dig us out of the python.eclass mess. That said, *this
> >
On Mon, Nov 05, 2012 at 06:54:45PM -0500, Mike Gilbert wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 5, 2012 at 6:34 PM, Brian Harring wrote:
> > This isn't quite what I'm asking for. I want y'all to literally
> > document thus:
> >
> > 1) What your finished solution is go
On Mon, Nov 05, 2012 at 05:50:24PM -0500, Mike Gilbert wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 5, 2012 at 5:25 PM, Brian Harring wrote:
> > On Mon, Nov 05, 2012 at 01:15:45PM +0100, Micha?? G??rny wrote:
> >> And in case anyone wondered, the output looks like this:
> >>
> >&
On Mon, Nov 05, 2012 at 01:15:45PM +0100, Micha?? G??rny wrote:
> And in case anyone wondered, the output looks like this:
>
> * PYTHON_TARGETS <-> USE_PYTHON inconsistency found. This may result
> * in missing modules when trying to use Python packages. Please ensure
> * that the same implemen
On Sun, Oct 28, 2012 at 10:35:01PM +0100, Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar Arahesis
wrote:
> 2012-10-28 22:14:15 Mike Gilbert napisa??(a):
> > This library is used for processing Unicode text in several high-profile
> > packages, including Chromium and other Webkit browsers, PHP, boost, and
> > many mor
On Thu, Oct 18, 2012 at 11:54:21PM +0200, Micha?? G??rny wrote:
> On Thu, 18 Oct 2012 02:15:43 -0700
> Brian Harring wrote:
>
> > There's a trick to this; currently, those generated scripts hardcode
> > the allowed/known python versions for that package. We obviously
On Thu, Oct 18, 2012 at 04:50:04PM -0400, Mike Gilbert wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 18, 2012 at 3:29 PM, Brian Harring wrote:
> > On Thu, Oct 18, 2012 at 11:28:59AM -0400, Mike Gilbert wrote:
> >> Regarding your /usr/bin/python3.2 /usr/bin/sphinx-build example:
> >> invoki
On Thu, Oct 18, 2012 at 11:28:59AM -0400, Mike Gilbert wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 18, 2012 at 5:15 AM, Brian Harring wrote:
> If we are somehow going to eliminate the installation of a separate
> script for each python version, then the symlink idea sounds like a
> good solution for ex
On Thu, Oct 18, 2012 at 08:02:42AM -0700, Brian Dolbec wrote:
> On Thu, 2012-10-18 at 02:15 -0700, Brian Harring wrote:
> > On a related note; we currently install multiple versions of the same
> > script- the only difference being the shebang. If one ignores the
> > sheban
On Thu, Oct 18, 2012 at 12:00:43PM +0200, Dirkjan Ochtman wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 18, 2012 at 11:15 AM, Brian Harring wrote:
> > Either way, thoughts?
>
> It looks like you haven't looked at the python-r1 effort. That means
> you probably also aren't subscribed to th
If folks haven't looked at python_generate_wrapper_scripts in
python.eclass, I'd suggest doing so. For examples of it's usage, grep
for 'python_generate_wrapper_scripts' in /usr/bin/; any place you see
it, look for -${PYTHON_TARGETS} (for example,
/usr/bin/sphinx-build{,-2.7,-3.2}.
Each usage
aran McCreesh wrote:
> >>> On Sun, 30 Sep 2012 14:42:14 -0700 Brian Harring
> >>> wrote:
> >>>>> The second is that it starts the conceptual shift from
> >>>>> "cat/pkg is a build dep, and cat/pkg is a run dep" to
> >&g
Cross-posting to scm; responses should go to scm please (and the
people who whinge about cross posting should go promptly to hell if
I have any say in the matter).
On Mon, Oct 01, 2012 at 05:58:43PM -0700, Diego Elio Petten?? wrote:
> On 01/10/2012 17:51, Gregory M. Turner wrote:
> >
> > Anyhow
On Mon, Oct 01, 2012 at 08:13:49AM +0100, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
> x? ( build: a run: b ) *is* nested "conflicting".
>
> You're still failing to understand the point of labels parsing rules,
> though: the point is to make uses like the above well defined and
> consistent.
I understand them just f
On Mon, Oct 01, 2012 at 08:36:12AM +0200, Fabian Groffen wrote:
> On 30-09-2012 14:47:17 -0700, Brian Harring wrote:
> > > In the worst case it returns "Bad marshalling data".
> >
> > Examples wanted for this. If this occurs, that's a python bug- one
&g
On Sun, Sep 30, 2012 at 10:53:40PM +0100, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
> But here's the thing: when you sell something as "pragmatic", what
> you're really saying is "it's wrong, I know it's wrong, and I'm going
> to pretend that wrong is a good thing". Getting it wrong should be
> something you do only
ael Orlitzky wrote:
> > On 09/19/2012 06:59 AM, Duncan wrote:
> >> Ben de Groot posted on Wed, 19 Sep 2012 12:22:06 +0800 as
> >> excerpted:
> >>
> >>> On 16 September 2012 21:15, Brian Harring
> >>> wrote:
> >>
> >>>&g
On Sun, Sep 30, 2012 at 10:58:06AM +0200, Fabian Groffen wrote:
> On 30-09-2012 10:31:17 +0200, Pacho Ramos wrote:
> > > > Personally, I usually run:
> > > > - python_clean_py-compile_files -> Clean py-compile files to disable
> > > > byte-compilation allowing us to drop all various ways of doing t
On Sun, Sep 30, 2012 at 09:30:18PM +0100, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
> On Sun, 30 Sep 2012 13:14:53 -0700
> Brian Harring wrote:
> > > That's largely because there are a lot of former Gentoo developers
> > > there who all said "oh, yeah, I forgot we could do it
On Sat, Sep 29, 2012 at 11:55:22AM +0200, Micha?? G??rny wrote:
> On Wed, 26 Sep 2012 03:29:17 -0700
> Brian Harring wrote:
>
> > On Wed, Sep 26, 2012 at 08:02:44AM +0200, Micha?? G??rny wrote:
> > > On Tue, 25 Sep 2012 12:54:39 -0700
> > > Brian Harring wro
On Sat, Sep 29, 2012 at 05:05:09PM +0100, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
> On Tue, 25 Sep 2012 15:46:14 -0700
> Brian Harring wrote:
> > Fun fact; peoples usage of labels in exherbo is thus:
> >
> > build+run:
> > set of deps
> > run:
> > set of deps/co
On Wed, Sep 26, 2012 at 08:58:54AM +0200, Micha?? G??rny wrote:
> On Sun, 16 Sep 2012 06:52:11 -0700
> Brian Harring wrote:
>
> > Keeping it short and quick, a basic glep has been written for what I'm
> > proposing for DEPENDENCIES enhancement.
> >
> > Th
On Wed, Sep 26, 2012 at 07:25:11PM -0300, Alexis Ballier wrote:
> On Wed, 26 Sep 2012 14:02:57 -0700
> Brian Harring wrote:
> > On Wed, Sep 26, 2012 at 02:38:02PM -0300, Alexis Ballier wrote:
> > > IUSE_RUNTIME is optional for PMs, why does the UI matter at all ?
> > &
On Thu, Sep 27, 2012 at 10:30:21AM -0700, Zac Medico wrote:
> On 09/27/2012 10:16 AM, Ian Stakenvicius wrote:
> > On 27/09/12 01:07 PM, Zac Medico wrote:
> >> On 09/27/2012 09:49 AM, Ulrich Mueller wrote:
> >>> As far as I can see, only the definition of the usex function
> >>> must be disabled. Pl
On Wed, Sep 26, 2012 at 02:38:02PM -0300, Alexis Ballier wrote:
> On Wed, 26 Sep 2012 03:29:17 -0700
> Brian Harring wrote:
>
> > On Wed, Sep 26, 2012 at 08:02:44AM +0200, Micha?? G??rny wrote:
> > > On Tue, 25 Sep 2012 12:54:39 -0700
> > > Brian Harring wro
On Wed, Sep 26, 2012 at 08:35:37AM +0200, Micha?? G??rny wrote:
> On Tue, 25 Sep 2012 13:12:56 -0700
> Brian Harring wrote:
>
> > On Mon, Sep 24, 2012 at 12:09:49AM +0200, Micha?? G??rny wrote:
> > > Hello,
> > >
> > > Since my previous idea of
On Wed, Sep 26, 2012 at 08:58:54AM +0200, Micha?? G??rny wrote:
> On Sun, 16 Sep 2012 06:52:11 -0700
> Brian Harring wrote:
>
> > Keeping it short and quick, a basic glep has been written for what I'm
> > proposing for DEPENDENCIES enhancement.
> >
> > Th
On Wed, Sep 26, 2012 at 08:02:44AM +0200, Micha?? G??rny wrote:
> On Tue, 25 Sep 2012 12:54:39 -0700
> Brian Harring wrote:
>
> > On Tue, Sep 25, 2012 at 08:58:07PM +0200, Micha?? G??rny wrote:
> > > On Tue, 25 Sep 2012 14:47:33 -0400
> > > Ian Stakenvicius w
On Sat, Sep 22, 2012 at 07:19:09PM +0200, Micha?? G??rny wrote:
> On Sat, 22 Sep 2012 10:05:41 -0700
> Brian Dolbec wrote:
>
> > On Sat, 2012-09-22 at 09:55 +0200, Micha?? G??rny wrote:
> > > Hello,
> > >
> > > The current dependency syntax:
> > >
> > > [VERSION-OP] PACKAGE-NAME ["-" PACKAGE-
Pardon the delay; got busy with work, plus to actually address your
claims re: labels (or refute, as I intend to do)... data was
necessary.
So I went and got the data. :)
Analysis was done roughly 09/17 or so; just looping back and
commenting now however.
On Sun, Sep 16, 2012 at 05:59:21PM +
On Sat, Sep 22, 2012 at 10:37:57PM +0200, Micha?? G??rny wrote:
> On Sat, 22 Sep 2012 21:41:24 +0200
> Pacho Ramos wrote:
>
> > Hello
> >
> > This comes from:
> > http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gentoo/dev/260536
> >
> > In that one, we try to use the following:
> > has vala ${IUSE//+/} &
On Mon, Sep 24, 2012 at 12:09:49AM +0200, Micha?? G??rny wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Since my previous idea of DYNAMIC_SLOTS proved too complex to design
> and implement, I would like to offer an another idea, based partially
> on what Ciaran mentioned. Before I start getting into details, I'd like
> to k
On Tue, Sep 25, 2012 at 08:58:07PM +0200, Micha?? G??rny wrote:
> On Tue, 25 Sep 2012 14:47:33 -0400
> Ian Stakenvicius wrote:
>
> > Based on the above I do expect the reference implementation would also
> > need to change. I expect, for instance, that the PM's
> > metadata-handling would need t
On Wed, Sep 19, 2012 at 12:53:09AM +0200, Micha?? G??rny wrote:
> On Tue, 18 Sep 2012 23:06:19 +0100
> Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
>
> > On Wed, 19 Sep 2012 00:01:21 +0200
> > Micha?? G??rny wrote:
> > > On Tue, 18 Sep 2012 22:37:19 +0100
> > > Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
> > > > On Tue, 18 Sep 2012 23:3
On Tue, Sep 18, 2012 at 11:38:50AM +0200, Ulrich Mueller wrote:
> >>>>> On Tue, 18 Sep 2012, Brian Harring wrote:
>
> > On Tue, Sep 18, 2012 at 10:25:51AM +0200, Micha?? G??rny wrote:
> >> Also, could you please stop spreading FUD with your examples?
>
>
On Tue, Sep 18, 2012 at 11:47:42AM +0200, Micha?? G??rny wrote:
> On Tue, 18 Sep 2012 02:24:26 -0700
> Brian Harring wrote:
>
> > On Tue, Sep 18, 2012 at 10:25:51AM +0200, Micha?? G??rny wrote:
> > > > test depends: to specifically mark those dependencies that are
&
On Tue, Sep 18, 2012 at 06:04:51AM +0200, Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar Arahesis
wrote:
> A potential dev-libs/dep package
I assume this is a hypothetical package; if this is something out of
your personal eapi/repo, please state so.
> might have valid use case for USE flags related to USE_EXPAND=
On Tue, Sep 18, 2012 at 08:48:16AM +0200, hasufell wrote:
> I am unsure if that does or could solve the problem why GLEP 62 was
> created, meaning... would enabling the "foo" useflag after the package
> has been emerged trigger a remerge in the following example?
>
> DEPENDENCIES="
> dep:run
On Tue, Sep 18, 2012 at 02:35:42PM -0600, Ryan Hill wrote:
> > On Mon, Sep 17, 2012 at 08:45:22AM +0200, Ralph Sennhauser wrote:
>
> > > Almost all affected packages can be bumped straight to 4 anyway and
> > > so use the improved syntax.
>
> toolchain_src_compile: EAPI=0: count: 38
>
> I'm not
On Tue, Sep 18, 2012 at 10:25:51AM +0200, Micha?? G??rny wrote:
> > test depends: to specifically mark those dependencies that are only
> > needed for when the pkg is being tested; effectively ephemeral
> > build/run time depends that go away once testing is completed.
>
> Does that mean that USE=
On Mon, Sep 17, 2012 at 08:45:22AM +0200, Ralph Sennhauser wrote:
> On Sun, 16 Sep 2012 19:41:14 -0700
> Brian Harring wrote:
>
> > On Sun, Sep 16, 2012 at 10:10:47PM -0400, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> > > On Sunday 16 September 2012 03:51:04 Brian Harring wrote:
> > &g
On Sun, Sep 16, 2012 at 07:32:39PM +0300, Alex Alexander wrote:
>On Sep 16, 2012 4:55 PM, "Brian Harring" <[1]ferri...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> Folks-
>>
>> Keeping it short and quick, a basic glep has been written for what
>I&#
On Sun, Sep 16, 2012 at 10:10:47PM -0400, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> On Sunday 16 September 2012 03:51:04 Brian Harring wrote:
> > + if ! has $EAPI 0 1 2 3; then
> > + eqawarn "built_with_use should not be used in $EAPI; use USE
> > deps."
&
On Sun, Sep 16, 2012 at 03:39:49PM +0100, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
> On Sun, 16 Sep 2012 06:52:11 -0700
> Brian Harring wrote:
> > The live version of the doc is available at
> > http://dev.gentoo.org/~ferringb/unified-dependencies/extensible_dependencies.html
> >
>
&
Folks-
Keeping it short and quick, a basic glep has been written for what I'm
proposing for DEPENDENCIES enhancement.
The live version of the doc is available at
http://dev.gentoo.org/~ferringb/unified-dependencies/extensible_dependencies.html
Wording fixes will occur, but the core concept s
On Sun, Sep 16, 2012 at 02:02:24PM +0200, Micha?? G??rny wrote:
> On Sun, 16 Sep 2012 04:49:21 -0700
> Brian Harring wrote:
>
> > On Sun, Sep 16, 2012 at 01:21:26PM +0200, Micha?? G??rny wrote:
> > > On Sun, 16 Sep 2012 04:10:01 -0700
> > > Brian Harring wro
On Sun, Sep 16, 2012 at 03:39:22PM +0800, Ben de Groot wrote:
> On 16 September 2012 09:20, Brian Harring wrote:
> > Dumps are at
> > http://dev.gentoo.org/~ferringb/unified-dependencies-example/ .
> >
> > Herds, if you want to see what your pkgs would look like, look a
On Sun, Sep 16, 2012 at 01:21:26PM +0200, Micha?? G??rny wrote:
> On Sun, 16 Sep 2012 04:10:01 -0700
> Brian Harring wrote:
>
> > On Sun, Sep 16, 2012 at 09:56:27AM +0200, Micha?? G??rny wrote:
> > > But consider that for example Zac & AxS (correct me if I recall it
On Sun, Sep 16, 2012 at 09:56:27AM +0200, Micha?? G??rny wrote:
> But consider that for example Zac & AxS (correct me if I recall it
> correctly) considered making changing the meaning of RDEPEND to install
> them before the build, thus effectively making 'build,run' useless.
I really am not tryin
At this point, the functionality built_with_use provides should
be covered near or more likely, in full, but USE deps in EAPI2 and
EAPI4; thus warn on usage.
While this may be a bit annoying, this is the only major consumer
left at this point that knows about /var/db/pkg layout; once that's
gone,
On Sun, Sep 16, 2012 at 12:03:36AM +0200, Micha?? G??rny wrote:
> On Sat, 15 Sep 2012 13:33:18 -0700
> Brian Harring wrote:
> > To demonstrate the gain of this, we basically take the existing
> > tree's deps, and re-render it into a unified DEPENDENCIES form.
>
>
On Sat, Sep 15, 2012 at 11:06:01PM +1200, Kent Fredric wrote:
> On 14 September 2012 10:17, Brian Harring wrote:
> >> All you need is something in bash that can parse DEPENDENCIES and
> >> populate *DEPEND , and the underlying guts could be done in
> >> practically
On Fri, Sep 14, 2012 at 07:18:54AM +1200, Kent Fredric wrote:
> On 11 September 2012 14:16, Brian Harring wrote:
> > On Fri, Sep 07, 2012 at 04:14:17PM -0400, Ian Stakenvicius wrote:
> >> Is there anything in particular in the spec/proposal for DEPENDENCIES
> >> that wo
On Thu, Sep 13, 2012 at 04:24:27PM +0100, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
> On Thu, 13 Sep 2012 03:39:19 -0700
> Brian Harring wrote:
> > 1) We disallow '@' in USE flags (yes, a use flag can actually have
> > '@' in it's name according to PMS; someone was hittin
Hola.
CC'ing pms since obviously they should comment, although the
discussion should be on -dev (aka, public, not an alias).
Sorry, this is a long email; condensing it down into a glep is viable,
just my time is limited (it's telling I started the gentoo stuff at
2am, wrapping up likely at 4am
On Thu, Sep 13, 2012 at 01:53:21AM -0400, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 12, 2012 at 4:36 PM, Brian Harring wrote:
> > Currently, there is a minor amount of ebuild/eclass usage of things
> > named __*; ~90% of it is 'import once' eclass code like the foll
Hola folks.
Currently portage exposes a fair amount of it's internal
implementation via vars/funcs into the ebulid env; this frankly makes
it easier for ebuilds/eclasses to localize themselves to portage
(rather than PMS), leading to breakage.
Thus a proposal for EAPI5 has been made, banning e
On Tue, Sep 11, 2012 at 7:13 AM, Michał Górny wrote:
> On Thu, 6 Sep 2012 01:11:45 -0700
> Brian Harring wrote:
>
>> A compatibility hack that stacks them is strongly advisable;
>> something akin to the following:
>>
>> Literally, we do the following:
>&
On Tue, Sep 11, 2012 at 06:36:46PM -0400, Rick "Zero_Chaos" Farina wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On 09/06/2012 02:50 PM, Micha?? G??rny wrote:
> > On Thu, 6 Sep 2012 09:49:13 -0700
> > Brian Harring wrote:
> >
> >>
On Fri, Sep 07, 2012 at 04:14:17PM -0400, Ian Stakenvicius wrote:
> Is there anything in particular in the spec/proposal for DEPENDENCIES
> that would exclude the addition of individual "build: app-cat/myatom"
> "run: app-cat/myatom" deps by an eclass or eclasses? I know the
> "goal" here is to ma
On Mon, Sep 10, 2012 at 01:28:23AM +, Duncan wrote:
> Brian Harring posted on Sun, 09 Sep 2012 15:10:27 -0700 as excerpted:
>
> > [Current profile config to to mask the USE=introspection
> > globally, but unmask it for app-crypt/gcr]:
> >
> &g
Hola folks.
Currently, our if you needed to mask the use flag introspection
globally, but allow it to be used for say app-crypt/gcr, the profile
configuration would be the following:
use.mask:
introspection
package.use.mask:
app-crypt/gcr -introspection
Frankly, this is a bit of a pain in the
On Thu, Sep 06, 2012 at 10:44:34PM +0200, hasufell wrote:
> I am missing a replacement for PYTHON_USE_WITH.
>
> Would the attached patch help in any way? Review? Other ideas?
> --- python-distutils-ng.eclass
> +++ python-distutils-ng.eclass
> @@ -59,6 +59,25 @@
> # Set to any value to disable au
On Sep 6, 2012 10:18 AM, "Michael Orlitzky" wrote:
>
> On 09/05/2012 05:29 PM, Brian Harring wrote:
> >
> > Yes, I stated it because I view it as useful/sane.
> >
> >> and isn't a compromise at all.
> >
> > I think you're mist
Yes. The manager can still parallelize prefetching, only consuming a build
job slot post fetch.
On Sep 6, 2012 11:49 AM, "Michał Górny" wrote:
> On Thu, 6 Sep 2012 09:49:13 -0700
> Brian Harring wrote:
>
> > One additional thought- re: the scenarios where we don'
On Wed, Sep 05, 2012 at 12:07:22PM +0100, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
> On Wed, 5 Sep 2012 13:00:05 +0200
> Micha?? G??rny wrote:
> > > I guess that's a pretty comprehensive "we need to do this properly"
> > > then.
> >
> > Did I say we don't need to? We have the two eclasses which need to do
> > this
On Mon, Sep 03, 2012 at 02:08:58PM +, Mark Bateman wrote:
> Patrick Lauer gentoo.org> writes:
>
> >
> > On 06/23/12 21:21, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
> > > There's been a move towards using slots for "clever" things that don't
> > > fit the traditional way of how slots worked. Examples include t
On Mon, Sep 03, 2012 at 10:54:15PM +0200, Maciej Mrozowski wrote:
> On Tuesday 28 of August 2012 02:15:40 hasufell wrote:
> > Is there a reason not to support static-libs in an ebuild if the package
> > supports it?
> >
> > It seems some developers don't care about this option. What's the gentoo
>
On Wed, Sep 05, 2012 at 12:06:45AM +, Jorge Manuel B. S. Vicetto wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On 31-08-2012 20:46, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
>
>
>
> > Also, we're getting rather a lot of *DEPEND variables here... If
> > we're making people make major changes to
On Tue, Sep 04, 2012 at 09:03:55PM -0400, Michael Orlitzky wrote:
> On 09/04/2012 05:06 PM, Brian Harring wrote:
> >>
> >> As a compromise, it could be made policy that "bump to EAPI=foo" bugs
> >> are valid. If someone would benefit from such a bump, he ca
On Sun, Sep 02, 2012 at 10:36:13AM -0400, Michael Orlitzky wrote:
> On 09/02/2012 09:46 AM, Rich Freeman wrote:
> > On Sun, Sep 2, 2012 at 9:10 AM, Andreas K. Huettel
> > wrote:
> >> What I dont actually understand at all is why bumping the EAPI should be so
> >> complicated or involved that it e
On Fri, Aug 31, 2012 at 11:12:44AM -0400, Alexis Ballier wrote:
> On Fri, 31 Aug 2012 15:45:21 +0100
> Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
>
> > On Fri, 31 Aug 2012 10:21:15 +0200
> > Ulrich Mueller wrote:
> > > Coming back to this old topic [1]. Is there still consensus that we
> > > should have such an EJO
On Fri, Aug 31, 2012 at 03:49:43PM +0100, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
> On Thu, 30 Aug 2012 23:58:00 + (UTC)
> Duncan <1i5t5.dun...@cox.net> wrote:
> > Of course an individual PM could choose to keep support for as long
> > as they want, but unless I'm missing something, that'd let PMs drop
> > supp
On Tue, Jul 24, 2012 at 04:32:00PM -0400, Michael Mol wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 24, 2012 at 4:24 PM, Ian Stakenvicius wrote:
> > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> > Hash: SHA256
> >
> > On 24/07/12 02:52 PM, Rick "Zero_Chaos" Farina wrote:
> >> On 07/24/2012 09:33 AM, Fabian Groffen wrote:
> >>> On
On Tue, Jun 19, 2012 at 08:54:07PM +0200, Thomas Sachau wrote:
> Ciaran McCreesh schrieb:
> > On Tue, 19 Jun 2012 20:16:39 +0200
> > Thomas Sachau wrote:
> >> Since there is again no response at all, it seems like everyone is ok
> >> with this, so i will propose to add this to the next council age
On Sun, Jun 17, 2012 at 10:31:59PM +0200, Micha?? G??rny wrote:
> Hello,
>
> A simple solution to a program long-unsolved. In GLEP form.
>
> Both attached and published as a gist:
>
> https://gist.github.com/2945569
>
> (please note that github doesn't render GLEP headers correctly)
>
> --
>
On Mon, Jun 18, 2012 at 10:34:44AM +0200, Micha?? G??rny wrote:
> On Sun, 17 Jun 2012 09:26:55 +0200
> Micha?? G??rny wrote:
>
> > I'm attaching a reStructuredText version of the spec. You can view it
> > rendered as a gist[1]. But please keep the replies on the list, rather
> > than forking the
On Sun, Jun 10, 2012 at 01:25:55PM +0100, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
> On Sat, 09 Jun 2012 13:55:53 -0700
> Zac Medico wrote:
> > A dependency atom will have optional SLOT and ABI_SLOT parts. Using
> > the dbus-glib depedency on glib:2 as an example [1], the dbus-glib
> > dependency will be expressed
On Thu, Jun 07, 2012 at 08:15:28PM +0100, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On Thu, 07 Jun 2012 15:14:03 -0400
> Ian Stakenvicius wrote:
> > How is the case of something like libpng going to be handled, where we
> > only support one API (and so only one
On Wed, Jun 06, 2012 at 05:43:49PM -0700, Zac Medico wrote:
> On 06/06/2012 12:23 PM, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
> > On Wed, 06 Jun 2012 21:16:05 +0200
> > Pacho Ramos wrote:
> >> Well, I think reading this thread is more or less clear what it would
> >> be supposed to do, also Zac suggested it and lo
On Tue, Jun 05, 2012 at 07:18:01PM -0700, Zac Medico wrote:
> On 06/05/2012 05:51 PM, Michael Weber wrote:
> > Is there any chance to detect this ZLIB_VERSION problem with
> > revdep-rebuild (worst case: add a list of possibly broken packages
> > with tests)?
>
> I'd suggest a special ebuild phase
On Tue, Jun 05, 2012 at 09:04:33AM +0200, Micha?? G??rny wrote:
> On Mon, 4 Jun 2012 15:57:53 -0700
> Brian Harring wrote:
>
> > Btw, good catch on package.mask. Hhadn't thought of that, that
> > *will* be the most contentious point. That can be dealt w/ via
&
On Sun, Jun 03, 2012 at 09:25:43AM +, Robin H. Johnson wrote:
> On Sun, Jun 03, 2012 at 08:31:43AM +, Duncan wrote:
> > Micha?? G??rny posted on Sun, 03 Jun 2012 09:22:04 +0200 as excerpted:
> >
> > >> Even if only the files metatdata changes, that still adds a significant
> > >> cost to a
On Tue, Jun 05, 2012 at 12:36:04AM +0200, Michael Weber wrote:
> On 06/04/2012 03:25 PM, Brian Harring wrote:
> > While I do grok the potential issue of someone being a hog
> > (specifically via blasting commit by commit rather than building up
> > work locally, then
On Mon, Jun 04, 2012 at 03:27:03PM -0400, Rich Freeman wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 4, 2012 at 3:10 PM, Brian Harring wrote:
> > One thing people need to keep in mind here is that when you sign the
> > commit, you're signing off on the history implicitly. ?Directly
> > addressi
On Mon, Jun 04, 2012 at 08:45:42PM +0200, Dirkjan Ochtman wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 4, 2012 at 7:25 PM, Rich Freeman wrote:
> > Anything we do has to be automated to be of any real value. ??Ideally
> > if something goes wrong it should be as detectable as possible.
>
> Yeah, but you'd have to part of
On Mon, Jun 04, 2012 at 03:49:31AM +, Kent Fredric wrote:
> On 3 June 2012 09:46, Robin H. Johnson wrote:
> If there are enough "Alice" developers, is it a possibility that Bob
> > will never have a chance to get his commit in?
> >
> > All this requires, is that in the time it takes Bob to do
On Mon, Jun 04, 2012 at 09:27:10AM +0200, Micha?? G??rny wrote:
> On Sun, 3 Jun 2012 09:48:26 +
> "Robin H. Johnson" wrote:
>
> > On Sun, Jun 03, 2012 at 11:34:07AM +0200, Micha?? G??rny wrote:
> > > I means using separate proto for metadata, not necesarrily git. In
> > > any case, if it come
On Fri, Jun 01, 2012 at 06:41:22PM -0400, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> # @FUNCTION: multijob_post_fork
> # @DESCRIPTION:
> # You must call this in the parent process after forking a child process.
> # If the parallel limit has been hit, it will wait for one to finish and
> # return the child's exit stat
On Sat, Jun 02, 2012 at 03:50:06PM -0700, Zac Medico wrote:
> On 06/02/2012 02:31 PM, Micha?? G??rny wrote:
> > On Sat, 2 Jun 2012 15:54:03 -0400
> > Mike Frysinger wrote:
> >
> >> # @FUNCTION: redirect_alloc_fd
> >> # @USAGE: [redirection]
> >> # @DESCRIPTION:
> >
> > (...and a lot of code)
>
er: $
>
> # @ECLASS: multiprocessing.eclass
> # @MAINTAINER:
> # base-sys...@gentoo.org
> # @AUTHORS:
> # Brian Harring
> # Mike Frysinger
> # @BLURB: parallelization with bash (wtf?)
> # @DESCRIPTION:
> # The multiprocessing eclass contains a suite of functions that allow e
On Mon, May 14, 2012 at 03:53:53AM -0400, Walter Dnes wrote:
> After some Google-searching, I think I've figured out how to implement
> automounting under mdev. I'd like to put in as much sanity-checking
> into the script as possible. Right now I have 1 USB stick plugged in as
> /dev/sdb. Th h
On Mon, Apr 30, 2012 at 03:36:17PM +0200, Ulrich Mueller wrote:
> > On Mon, 30 Apr 2012, Thomas Sachau wrote:
>
> > Krzysztof Pawlik schrieb:
> >> On 30/04/12 10:39, Ulrich Mueller wrote:
> > If the eclass doesn't work with FEATURES="collision-protect"
> > then it needs to be fixed.
>
On Wed, Apr 04, 2012 at 08:36:37PM -0400, Mike Gilbert wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 4, 2012 at 8:07 PM, Brian Harring wrote:
> > On Wed, Apr 04, 2012 at 10:41:03AM -0400, Mike Gilbert wrote:
> >> On Wed, Apr 4, 2012 at 4:50 AM, Corentin Chary
> >> wrote:
> >> > I
On Wed, Apr 04, 2012 at 10:41:03AM -0400, Mike Gilbert wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 4, 2012 at 4:50 AM, Corentin Chary
> wrote:
> > I have a feature request for distutil-ng (or maybe it's already
> > possible but I don't know how).
> >
> > I have a package that depends on python-dateutil:python-2 for
> >
On Sat, Mar 31, 2012 at 10:52:53AM +0100, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
> On Sat, 31 Mar 2012 12:44:03 +0300
> Alex Alexander wrote:
> > @preserved-libs works very well and is awesome. hack or not. IMO it
> > should be in stable already. I've been using it on stable production
> > boxes for years without
On Sat, Mar 31, 2012 at 08:44:02AM +, Sven Vermeulen wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 30, 2012 at 10:06:18AM +0200, Pacho Ramos wrote:
> > Looks then that there are several alternatives for portage tree, then,
> > maybe the option would be to add a note to Gentoo Handbook explaining
> > the cons of having
On Fri, Mar 23, 2012 at 01:46:17PM +0300, Alexey Shvetsov wrote:
> Hi!
>
> Well i have 2 arm lxc containers on amd64 machine. Its works good if
> qemu support most of needed cross arch instructions
I'd be curious how much of that is native, vs emulated. The hybrid
approach of scratchbox/obs h
On Mon, Mar 19, 2012 at 02:36:34PM +1300, Kent Fredric wrote:
> On 19 March 2012 14:12, Steven J Long wrote:
> >
> > As for non-bash ebuilds, I have always agreed with antarus that they should
> > simply use a different extension. Adding a new extension per source language
> > is a *lot* cleaner t
1 - 100 of 735 matches
Mail list logo
