e fuzzy to me. Lance's
proposition does have potential, but I worry over the competence and
dedication of the individual to fill that role.
-Chandler Carruth, yet another gentoo user.
--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
Brian Harring wrote:
>On Mon, Dec 26, 2005 at 11:28:17PM -0500, Chandler Carruth wrote:
>
>
>>It occurs to me that this could be (to an extent) accomplished by having
>>a few more "specialized" subprofiles for x86: base, desktop, gnome, and kde.
>>
&g
igger problems with this than I'm seeing,
but as an alternative to USE-flag grouping/meta structure/etc, i thought
i'd toss out the very flexible profile system we already have available
(afaik). =] Profiles are I think underused, but there may well be _good_
reasons for that, so just my 2cents.
-Chandler Carruth, yet another gentoo user...
--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
workstations on which I could run simultaneous
tests, causing transactions to become relevant and important, etc etc,
and further hardware might be available here.) Hope this can be of some
use to you in trying to make this evaluation.
-Chandler Carruth
--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
dependant on the difficult to manage
transcode version.
As a user currently, what steps could I take to help this package stay
alive? I will take them as the alternative is to put an unofficial
ebuild up on a webpage.
-Chandler Carruth
Roy Marples wrote:
On Thursday 08 December 2005 20:23
