-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 06/30/2015 02:26 PM, Jauhien Piatlicki wrote:
> Hi Daniel,
>
> On 06/20/2015 05:35 AM, Daniel "zlg" Campbell wrote:
>> Sorry for not replying sooner; my client didn't seem to reflect
>> folder updates...
&g
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 06/16/2015 01:25 PM, Jauhien Piatlicki wrote:
> Hi Daniel,
>
> so will you take the maintainership? I will reassign bugs to you
> then.
>
> On 06/06/2015 09:23 PM, Daniel "zlg" Campbell wrote:
>> On 06/06/2015
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 06/10/2015 01:43 PM, Ulrich Mueller wrote:
> Hi, The number of EAPI 1 ebuilds in the Portage tree has decreased
> to a total of 60, corresponding to 0.16 %.
>
> We briefly discussed in the QA team if we should demote EAPI 1 in
> layout.conf from
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 06/08/2015 12:47 PM, William Hubbs wrote:
> On Sat, Jun 06, 2015 at 09:26:08AM +0200, Justin Lecher (jlec)
> wrote:
>> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512
>>
>> Hi everyone,
>>
>> Can we get an agreement on how we are indenting metad
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 06/06/2015 09:02 AM, Jauhien Piatlicki wrote:
> Hi,
>
> the list of packages that I'm no longer interested in:
>
> media-sound/apulse -- needs version bump dev-util/android-ndk --
> needs version bump
>
> I will remove myself from maintainers o
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 05/20/2015 10:24 AM, Francesco Riosa wrote:
> Il 20/05/2015 04:18, Daniel "zlg" Campbell ha scritto:
>> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256
>>
>> On 05/19/2015 06:40 AM, Francesco Riosa wrote:
>>
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 05/19/2015 06:40 AM, Francesco Riosa wrote:
> Il 18/05/2015 23:13, Tim Harder ha scritto:
>> * media-gfx/darktable * media-gfx/dcraw * media-gfx/gmic *
>> media-gfx/rawtherapee * media-plugins/gimp-gmic
>>
> nobody for these? they are rather impo
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 05/18/2015 02:13 PM, Tim Harder wrote:
> Here are some packages that I've dropped (or will drop) myself as
> primary maintainer from. Many of them (e.g. protobuf*) could really
> use some more collaborative non-maintainer update method but no one
