[gentoo-dev] Packages up for grabs

2014-06-08 Thread Fabio Erculiani
x11-apps/python-whiteboard x11-apps/whyteboard x11-drivers/cwiid -- Fabio Erculiani

Re: [gentoo-dev] Anyone with access to genkernel repository? Or should genkernel be p.masked on amd64 profiles?

2014-05-31 Thread Fabio Erculiani
On May 31, 2014 8:42 PM, Robin H. Johnson robb...@gentoo.org wrote: On Fri, May 30, 2014 at 06:10:40PM +0300, Samuli Suominen wrote: I can't find anyone with access that actually replies to mails, pings, ... to genkernel repository for: https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=461828

Re: [gentoo-dev] Anyone with access to genkernel repository? Or should genkernel be p.masked on amd64 profiles?

2014-05-31 Thread Fabio Erculiani
-Mail : robb...@gentoo.org GnuPG FP : 11ACBA4F 4778E3F6 E4EDF38E B27B944E 34884E85 -- Fabio Erculiani

Re: [gentoo-dev] Anyone with access to genkernel repository? Or should genkernel be p.masked on amd64 profiles?

2014-05-30 Thread Fabio Erculiani
that you think need to maintain its configuration. Rich -- Fabio Erculiani

Re: [gentoo-dev] [OT] pkgcore bikeshed (was Portage team)

2014-01-13 Thread Fabio Erculiani
design... -- Fabio Erculiani

Re: [gentoo-dev] [OT] pkgcore bikeshed (was Portage team)

2014-01-13 Thread Fabio Erculiani
(a single vdb.dbapi.match() can eat 100MB of RAM). We know how Python deals with freed memory... Sigh... -A -- Luis Ressel ara...@aixah.de GPG fpr: F08D 2AF6 655E 25DE 52BC E53D 08F5 7F90 3029 B5BD -- Fabio Erculiani

[gentoo-dev] Doing and then undoing slotmoves

2013-12-18 Thread Fabio Erculiani
://sources.gentoo.org/cgi-bin/viewvc.cgi/gentoo-x86/profiles/updates/2Q-2013?r1=1.1r2=1.2 -- Fabio Erculiani

Re: [gentoo-dev] Doing and then undoing slotmoves

2013-12-18 Thread Fabio Erculiani
. Paweł -- Fabio Erculiani

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-user] OpenRc-0.12 is coming soon

2013-08-16 Thread Fabio Erculiani
-- Fabio Erculiani

Re: [gentoo-dev] Gnome Stabilization 3.6 or 3.8

2013-08-08 Thread Fabio Erculiani
to unmerge gnome on all support requests as it now moves outside our support range ... Have a nice day, Patrick -- Fabio Erculiani

Re: [gentoo-dev] Gnome Stabilization 3.6 or 3.8

2013-08-08 Thread Fabio Erculiani
On Thu, Aug 8, 2013 at 4:10 PM, Alon Bar-Lev alo...@gentoo.org wrote: On Thu, Aug 8, 2013 at 5:01 PM, Fabio Erculiani lx...@gentoo.org wrote: Moreover, the lvm problem is caused by a very ancient and ill decision about doing what upstream tells you to avoid: have mdev in the initramfs and udev

Re: [gentoo-dev] Autobuilds go to /experimental and to /releases only when someone actually tests them

2013-07-27 Thread Fabio Erculiani
Some time ago I was also thinking about writing a test framework for testing live images through kvm. Of course I didn't manage to find time to try to arrange something in the end, but the idea is still popping up in my mind every now and then. -- Fabio Erculiani

Re: [gentoo-dev] Running tests using virtualx.eclass should be allowed to be forced to run in virtual X always

2013-07-19 Thread Fabio Erculiani
thousands of times and randomly pick an initial state to see if you spot a scenario in where you have problems (concurrency problems)... :-) Diego Elio Pettenò — Flameeyes flamee...@flameeyes.eu — http://blog.flameeyes.eu/ -- Fabio Erculiani

Re: [gentoo-dev] Proper distribution integration of kernel *-sources, patches and configuration.

2013-07-02 Thread Fabio Erculiani
is not reliable and doesn't work (chroot, binpkgs, containers without kernel, and so on...). Making sure that the user doesn't build an unbootable kernel is the way to go. -- Sergei -- Fabio Erculiani

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-kernel] Proper distribution integration of kernel *-sources, patches and configuration.

2013-07-01 Thread Fabio Erculiani
I believe that end users would benefit more from kernel binary ebuilds (ebuilds building an actual kernel with an official config), rather than all this. -- Fabio Erculiani

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-kernel] Proper distribution integration of kernel *-sources, patches and configuration.

2013-07-01 Thread Fabio Erculiani
On Mon, Jul 1, 2013 at 9:59 PM, Pacho Ramos pa...@gentoo.org wrote: El lun, 01-07-2013 a las 21:55 +0200, Fabio Erculiani escribió: I believe that end users would benefit more from kernel binary ebuilds (ebuilds building an actual kernel with an official config), rather than all this. I

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-kernel] Proper distribution integration of kernel *-sources, patches and configuration.

2013-07-01 Thread Fabio Erculiani
using it in production for almost 2 years now (can't remember exactly). -- Regards, Markos Chandras - Gentoo Linux Developer http://dev.gentoo.org/~hwoarang -- Fabio Erculiani

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-kernel] Proper distribution integration of kernel *-sources, patches and configuration.

2013-07-01 Thread Fabio Erculiani
On Mon, Jul 1, 2013 at 10:24 PM, Christoph Junghans ott...@gentoo.org wrote: 2013/7/1 Fabio Erculiani lx...@gentoo.org: I believe that end users would benefit more from kernel binary ebuilds (ebuilds building an actual kernel with an official config), rather than all this. +1 The binary use

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-kernel] Proper distribution integration of kernel *-sources, patches and configuration.

2013-07-01 Thread Fabio Erculiani
://dev.gentoo.org/~hwoarang -- Anthony G. Basile, Ph.D. Gentoo Linux Developer [Hardened] E-Mail: bluen...@gentoo.org GnuPG FP : 1FED FAD9 D82C 52A5 3BAB DC79 9384 FA6E F52D 4BBA GnuPG ID : F52D4BBA -- Fabio Erculiani

Re: [gentoo-dev] eselect init

2013-06-21 Thread Fabio Erculiani
the porting, etc). Making the switch between openrc and systemd easy is a big win (for both developers, distro maintainers, users) and makes Gentoo more attractive, but this is another topic... -- Fabio Erculiani

Re: [gentoo-dev] eselect init

2013-06-21 Thread Fabio Erculiani
Fix the reason why the wrapper got broken then. If the wrapper broke, it is most likely a symptom of a bigger problem. I think that sysvinit's /sbin/init should be renamed to /sbin/sysvinit (or /bin/sysvinit?), anyway... -- Fabio Erculiani

Re: [gentoo-dev] Temporary DevRel actions for CoC violations

2013-06-20 Thread Fabio Erculiani
The final outcome I would love to see is that everybody eventually graduates from kindergarten :-) And perhaps introduce a culture-fit score in the recruiting, mentoring process. -- Fabio Erculiani

Re: [gentoo-dev] eselect init

2013-06-20 Thread Fabio Erculiani
-love/commit/ced29311348a81a2573b030b1316f1c3a0335c5b [2] https://github.com/Sabayon/systemd-love/commit/9eea3ff713c8fa0391e7b1bfa494d533dc21c0be [3] https://github.com/Sabayon/systemd-love/blob/master/eclass/eselect-init.eclass -- Fabio Erculiani

Re: [gentoo-dev] Temporary DevRel actions for CoC violations

2013-06-20 Thread Fabio Erculiani
Thanks for the offer, I appreciate it, but I have to decline this time. -- Fabio Erculiani

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Re: eselect init

2013-06-02 Thread Fabio Erculiani
;-) -- Fabio Erculiani

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Making systemd more accessible to normal users

2013-05-18 Thread Fabio Erculiani
would reduce our maintenance burden in the long run. Anyway, I'm not trying to convince anybody in using either init systems, I am just suggesting that you should try both and decide yourself. Which translated, is the same goal as making systemd more accessible to you. -- Fabio Erculiani

Re: [gentoo-dev] Making systemd more accessible to normal users

2013-05-15 Thread Fabio Erculiani
of the world? (It's not a sarcastic question). I hope that everybody does their own reality check. -- Fabio Erculiani

Re: [gentoo-dev] Making systemd more accessible to normal users

2013-05-08 Thread Fabio Erculiani
On Wed, May 8, 2013 at 5:26 PM, Ben de Groot yng...@gentoo.org wrote: On 1 May 2013 18:04, Fabio Erculiani lx...@gentoo.org wrote: It looks like there is some consensus on the effort of making systemd more accessible, while there are problems with submitting bugs about new systemd units

Re: [gentoo-dev] Making systemd more accessible to normal users

2013-05-08 Thread Fabio Erculiani
On Wed, May 8, 2013 at 5:39 PM, Chí-Thanh Christopher Nguyễn chith...@gentoo.org wrote: Ben de Groot schrieb: On 1 May 2013 18:04, Fabio Erculiani lx...@gentoo.org wrote: It looks like there is some consensus on the effort of making systemd more accessible, while there are problems

Re: [gentoo-dev] Making systemd more accessible to normal users

2013-05-08 Thread Fabio Erculiani
On Wed, May 8, 2013 at 5:49 PM, Ben de Groot yng...@gentoo.org wrote: On 8 May 2013 23:39, Fabio Erculiani lx...@gentoo.org wrote: On Wed, May 8, 2013 at 5:26 PM, Ben de Groot yng...@gentoo.org wrote: On 1 May 2013 18:04, Fabio Erculiani lx...@gentoo.org wrote: It looks like there is some

[gentoo-dev] Re: Making systemd more accessible to normal users

2013-05-07 Thread Fabio Erculiani
Tracker bug: https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=468898 -- Fabio Erculiani

Re: [gentoo-dev] Making systemd more accessible to normal users

2013-05-04 Thread Fabio Erculiani
On Sat, May 4, 2013 at 12:42 PM, Luca Barbato lu_z...@gentoo.org wrote: On 05/01/2013 12:04 PM, Fabio Erculiani wrote: PLEASE DO NOT START A FLAME WAR AND READ ON FIRST. THIS IS NOT A POST AGAINST OPENRC. Amen With the release of Sabayon 13.04 [1] and thanks to the efforts I put

Re: [gentoo-dev] Making systemd more accessible to normal users

2013-05-04 Thread Fabio Erculiani
On Sat, May 4, 2013 at 3:05 PM, Fabio Erculiani lx...@gentoo.org wrote: Scenario: - you have an initramfs with mdev, your pivot_chroot system runs udev. - you have a LVM volume group, containing the lvm volume for / and /home, and perhaps you also have swap on another volume. - you boot

Re: [gentoo-dev] Making systemd more accessible to normal users

2013-05-02 Thread Fabio Erculiani
Manage the XvMC implementation used by your system Why aren't we telling people to just edit config files!? -- Fabio Erculiani

[gentoo-dev] Making systemd more accessible to normal users

2013-05-01 Thread Fabio Erculiani
/Sabayon/systemd-love [3] For instance: https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=465236 [4] useless crap: https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=399615 Cheers, -- Fabio Erculiani

Re: [gentoo-dev] Making systemd more accessible to normal users

2013-05-01 Thread Fabio Erculiani
On Wed, May 1, 2013 at 12:50 PM, Pacho Ramos pa...@gentoo.org wrote: El mié, 01-05-2013 a las 12:04 +0200, Fabio Erculiani escribió: [...] - other ~490 systemd units are missing at this time and writing them could also be a great GSoC project (don't look at me, I'm busy enough

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Making systemd more accessible to normal users

2013-05-01 Thread Fabio Erculiani
On Wed, May 1, 2013 at 2:54 PM, Steven J. Long sl...@rathaus.eclipse.co.uk wrote: On Wed, May 01, 2013 at 12:04:00PM +0200, Fabio Erculiani wrote: PLEASE DO NOT START A FLAME WAR AND READ ON FIRST. THIS IS NOT A POST AGAINST OPENRC. With the release of Sabayon 13.04 [1] and thanks

Re: [gentoo-dev] Making systemd more accessible to normal users

2013-05-01 Thread Fabio Erculiani
There is no tracker yet. But it may be very well materialize at some point. -- Fabio Erculiani

Re: [gentoo-dev] Making systemd more accessible to normal users

2013-05-01 Thread Fabio Erculiani
On Wed, May 1, 2013 at 9:52 PM, Paweł Hajdan, Jr. phajdan...@gentoo.org wrote: On 5/1/13 3:04 AM, Fabio Erculiani wrote: As far as I read the bug, Mike (vapier) is doing the right thing. Distros doing lots of custom changes can only add more chaos to the picture. We are a distribution, we

Re: [gentoo-dev] Making systemd more accessible to normal users

2013-05-01 Thread Fabio Erculiani
for it are majority cases, so collectively I'm still in favour of the eselect + symlinks approach. -- Kent -- Fabio Erculiani

Re: [gentoo-dev] [PATCHES] kernel-2.eclass: Various changes requested by users. + [STABLEREQ?] sys-kernel/gentoo-sources-3.8.7: Any objections against stabilizing?

2013-04-13 Thread Fabio Erculiani
: C165 AF18 AB4C 400B C3D2 ABF0 95B2 1FCD 6D34 E57D -- Fabio Erculiani

Re: [gentoo-dev] [fyi] lddtree magic

2013-04-10 Thread Fabio Erculiani
It looks like you're not using a standard style guide for Python but rather this one [1]. I suggest you to use something closer to PEP8. [1] https://code.google.com/p/google-styleguide/ -- Fabio Erculiani

Re: [gentoo-dev] [fyi] lddtree magic

2013-04-10 Thread Fabio Erculiani
On Wed, Apr 10, 2013 at 5:33 PM, Mike Frysinger vap...@gentoo.org wrote: On Wednesday 10 April 2013 06:04:00 Fabio Erculiani wrote: It looks like you're not using a standard style guide for Python but rather this one [1]. I suggest you to use something closer to PEP8. no Good arguments

Re: [gentoo-dev] [fyi] lddtree magic

2013-04-10 Thread Fabio Erculiani
On Wed, Apr 10, 2013 at 6:32 PM, Mike Frysinger vap...@gentoo.org wrote: On Wednesday 10 April 2013 12:42:14 Fabio Erculiani wrote: On Wed, Apr 10, 2013 at 5:33 PM, Mike Frysinger wrote: On Wednesday 10 April 2013 06:04:00 Fabio Erculiani wrote: It looks like you're not using a standard

Re: RFC: install linux-firmware with kernel sources (was Re: [gentoo-dev] Lastrite: Firmware cleanup, part #1)

2013-02-12 Thread Fabio Erculiani
I am starting to believe that this is yet another good reason for having official ebuilds building binaries off gentoo-sources through genkernel. Pretty much the same I do in Sabayon since 2007. -- Fabio Erculiani

Re: RFC: install linux-firmware with kernel sources (was Re: [gentoo-dev] Lastrite: Firmware cleanup, part #1)

2013-02-12 Thread Fabio Erculiani
On Tue, Feb 12, 2013 at 7:47 PM, Pacho Ramos pa...@gentoo.org wrote: El mar, 12-02-2013 a las 19:43 +, Fabio Erculiani escribió: I am starting to believe that this is yet another good reason for having official ebuilds building binaries off gentoo-sources through genkernel. Pretty much

Re: RFC: install linux-firmware with kernel sources (was Re: [gentoo-dev] Lastrite: Firmware cleanup, part #1)

2013-02-10 Thread Fabio Erculiani
of the listed issues without causing other side effects. For starters, if kernel sources provide /lib/firmware, how do you deal with file collisions? Cheers, Dirkjan -- Fabio Erculiani

Re: [gentoo-dev] readme.gentoo.eclass: Add a readme.gentoo_force_print_elog function to force elog printing

2013-02-01 Thread Fabio Erculiani
/packages/amd64/5/x11-misc_bumblebee-3.0.1-r2_0.tbz2/portage/x11-misc/bumblebee-3.0.1-r2/work/bumblebee-3.0.1' -- Fabio Erculiani

Re: [gentoo-dev] readme.gentoo.eclass: Add a readme.gentoo_force_print_elog function to force elog printing

2013-02-01 Thread Fabio Erculiani
No FILESDIR nor T in pkg_* phases please! -- Fabio Erculiani

Re: [gentoo-dev] splashutils needs a maintainer

2013-01-28 Thread Fabio Erculiani
, then, it probably has some incompatibility Gentoo :/) Officially, we have always used fbsplash + splashutils. I have no experience with dracut/plymouth though. -- Fabio Erculiani

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: RFC: CONFIG_CHECK_FATAL, making CONFIG_CHECKS fatal by default

2013-01-26 Thread Fabio Erculiani
I am starting to think that the real problem is that Gentoo does not have ebuilds for building kernels (binary kernels). At that point, it would be easy to add USE flags and virtual packages to solve the config check problem at the dependencies level once and for all. -- Fabio Erculiani

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: RFC: CONFIG_CHECK_FATAL, making CONFIG_CHECKS fatal by default

2013-01-26 Thread Fabio Erculiani
What I always wondered is why we have ebuilds for every kind of binary except for kernels, yet we build official kernels with official configs for our livecds. -- Fabio Erculiani

Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: CONFIG_CHECK_FATAL, making CONFIG_CHECKS fatal by default

2013-01-24 Thread Fabio Erculiani
On Thu, Jan 24, 2013 at 1:10 AM, Robin H. Johnson robb...@gentoo.org wrote: On Wed, Jan 23, 2013 at 12:32:40PM +, Fabio Erculiani wrote: I hope this is going to be binary package manager friendly. In Sabayon for instance, kernel sources are not even installed and at the same time, /proc

Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: CONFIG_CHECK_FATAL, making CONFIG_CHECKS fatal by default

2013-01-23 Thread Fabio Erculiani
to be smarter than the user. -- Fabio Erculiani

Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: CONFIG_CHECK_FATAL, making CONFIG_CHECKS fatal by default

2013-01-23 Thread Fabio Erculiani
I think that the problem is that it is trying to be smart when it's not really possible (unless you want to cover all the corner cases, which is a pain). -- Fabio Erculiani

Re: [gentoo-dev] udev-ng? (Was: Summary Council meeting Tuesday 13 November 2012)

2012-11-19 Thread Fabio Erculiani
In my humble opinion, the real question is: why systemd got merged into udev? I would love to hear a clear technical reason for that. -- Fabio Erculiani

Re: [gentoo-dev] Tightly-coupled core distro [was: Council meeting summary for 3 April 2012]

2012-11-18 Thread Fabio Erculiani
It depends on who is actually laughing I'd say. just my 0.01c. -- Fabio Erculiani

Re: [gentoo-dev] HDEPEND (host dependencies for cross-compilation) for EAPI 5?

2012-09-05 Thread Fabio Erculiani
psMjf9lSJHLcXuhtOz9OW4qmhp4BGCA8Rgeoq25Yw8E2eH0abvDbHR5U7u1hEpnQ j6rJ0fZ27tfbMecd5i8b =Zv/I -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- Fabio Erculiani

Re: [gentoo-dev] HDEPEND (host dependencies for cross-compilation) for EAPI 5?

2012-09-05 Thread Fabio Erculiani
On Wed, Sep 5, 2012 at 12:44 PM, Rich Freeman ri...@gentoo.org wrote: On Wed, Sep 5, 2012 at 3:19 AM, Fabio Erculiani lx...@gentoo.org wrote: The complexity would become: O((b + r + p) * P) b = amount of buildtime dependencies r = amount of runtime dependencies p = amount of post

[gentoo-dev] [RFC] EAPI 5+: split PDEPEND introducing SDEPEND

2012-09-02 Thread Fabio Erculiani
: and it is not strictly required that a package manager must ensure that the dependency graph is still consistent afterwards. -- Fabio Erculiani

Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] EAPI 5+: split PDEPEND introducing SDEPEND

2012-09-02 Thread Fabio Erculiani
/networkmanager for example (this is what I mean with USE flags abuse, actually). I'm not saying that SDEPEND is the best one-size-fits-all solution but you may agree that's the simplest and most effective one. -- Fabio Erculiani

Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] EAPI 5+: split PDEPEND introducing SDEPEND

2012-09-02 Thread Fabio Erculiani
On Sun, Sep 2, 2012 at 5:23 PM, Michał Górny mgo...@gentoo.org wrote: On Sun, 2 Sep 2012 17:09:22 +0200 Fabio Erculiani lx...@gentoo.org wrote: On Sun, Sep 2, 2012 at 4:57 PM, hasufell hasuf...@gentoo.org wrote: Why not introduce a global useflag such as suggested-deps which complies

Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] EAPI 5+: split PDEPEND introducing SDEPEND

2012-09-02 Thread Fabio Erculiani
of proposals: if it takes me more than 5 minutes to understand it, then users (!= devs) will have to go through the same or more wtf-period. And the probability of them giving up / getting sick / ignoring it is linear with the wtf-period. -- Ciaran McCreesh -- Fabio Erculiani

Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] EAPI 5+: split PDEPEND introducing SDEPEND

2012-09-02 Thread Fabio Erculiani
On Sun, Sep 2, 2012 at 9:04 PM, Ciaran McCreesh ciaran.mccre...@googlemail.com wrote: On Sun, 2 Sep 2012 20:46:19 +0200 Fabio Erculiani lx...@gentoo.org wrote: On Sun, Sep 2, 2012 at 8:08 PM, Ciaran McCreesh ciaran.mccre...@googlemail.com wrote: and we have worked out all the difficulties

Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] EAPI 5+: split PDEPEND introducing SDEPEND

2012-09-02 Thread Fabio Erculiani
s/with/on/ -- Fabio Erculiani

Re: [gentoo-dev] HDEPEND (host dependencies for cross-compilation) for EAPI 5?

2012-08-31 Thread Fabio Erculiani
think that if we're going to split *DEPEND, it might be a good opportunity to do it right _once_ and _for all_. -- Fabio Erculiani

Re: [gentoo-dev] HDEPEND (host dependencies for cross-compilation) for EAPI 5?

2012-08-31 Thread Fabio Erculiani
spaghetti to me. I think SDEPEND is a much simpler approach to the issue, why introducing a new kind of USE flags to address what really belongs to *DEPEND? -- Thanks, Zac -- Fabio Erculiani

Re: [gentoo-dev] ebuild laziness and binpkg overhead

2012-06-16 Thread Fabio Erculiani
Anything build-time related should not be placed into pkg_setup (I am pointing the finger to those build-related die() that are breaking binpkgs support). There's src_prepare() and src_configure() nowadays. -- Fabio Erculiani

Re: [gentoo-dev] Git braindump: 2 of N: developer interaction (merge co-ordinators)

2012-06-03 Thread Fabio Erculiani
there, the problem is if these protocols can be applied to the git workflow. Just brain-dumping... -- Fabio Erculiani

Re: [gentoo-dev] Portage Git migration - clean cut or git-cvsserver

2012-05-23 Thread Fabio Erculiani
Please kill CVS with fire! I've been waiting for this since 2009. -- Fabio Erculiani

Re: [gentoo-dev] Portage Git migration - clean cut or git-cvsserver

2012-05-23 Thread Fabio Erculiani
) (arunsr | GNOME) -- Fabio Erculiani

Re: [gentoo-dev] Remove eclass/ChangeLog

2012-05-22 Thread Fabio Erculiani
SIGNATURE- -- Fabio Erculiani

Re: [gentoo-dev] Do we need games group and all that game prefixes?

2012-05-20 Thread Fabio Erculiani
I second that. simplicity = win. -- Fabio Erculiani

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: RFC: Enable FEATURES=config-protect-if-modified by default?

2012-05-16 Thread Fabio Erculiani
I implemented this feature in Entropy long time ago (2009 iirc) and enabled it by default as well. We never had a single issue. Users seem quite happy about it. So yeah, go for it! -- Fabio Erculiani

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: RFC: Enable FEATURES=config-protect-if-modified by default?

2012-05-16 Thread Fabio Erculiani
will have to remember to turn it off. -- Eray Aslan e...@gentoo.org -- Fabio Erculiani

Re: [gentoo-dev] Tightly-coupled core distro [was: Council meeting summary for 3 April 2012]

2012-05-10 Thread Fabio Erculiani
+kLLkkEa2FZSrg8xwG3Ty5SpCAVQWcJIn3L1tziD58kt1DtpJjs jt0bV1eT2JnxL4v7GopxUI55n4bmqqzRP7SebkK4B7AOlae1fxjukqpNC6s6oTgc CBoWiJ7DkRbcTk+ww+MF+xUCmYrqPFlf8aQ8+j16LogaTCeV09QIhAqUKkcQB8Lx k6gGD6H5elPsYDm1gP/wBe1WEe6zLXDLd6LFiEYKHjyiznGDs1BAEk0oJMbob5I3 HbAYiBP8P7D7FBosO7oj =INQn -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- Fabio Erculiani

Re: [gentoo-dev] Tightly-coupled core distro [was: Council meeting summary for 3 April 2012]

2012-05-09 Thread Fabio Erculiani
, thanks. -- Fabio Erculiani

Re: [gentoo-dev] Tightly-coupled core distro [was: Council meeting summary for 3 April 2012]

2012-05-09 Thread Fabio Erculiani
talking with. I am not against changes, I am actually in favor of them, but only when they really make sense and solve problems, which it doesn't seem the case lately. I didn't want to offend anyone, but just having fun (sigh) of IMHO bad design decisions. -- Fabio Erculiani

[gentoo-dev] unsafe use of gtk-query-immodules

2012-04-25 Thread Fabio Erculiani
x11-libs/gtk+ and should be fixed. -- Fabio Erculiani http://lxnay.com

Re: [gentoo-dev] unsafe use of gtk-query-immodules

2012-04-25 Thread Fabio Erculiani
On Wed, Apr 25, 2012 at 5:53 PM, Mike Frysinger vap...@gentoo.org wrote: isn't this what bugzilla is for ?  reporting bugs ? -mike Tracker Bug 413529 already filed. -- Fabio Erculiani

Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: Application name in metadata.xml

2012-02-13 Thread Fabio Erculiani
Markos, there are also webapps. -- Fabio Erculiani http://lxnay.com

Re: [gentoo-dev] media-video/nvidia-settings is orphan for a long time

2012-02-12 Thread Fabio Erculiani
. -- Fabio Erculiani

[gentoo-dev] RFC: Application name in metadata.xml

2012-02-11 Thread Fabio Erculiani
.dtd) to also support this? It would be nice to show this info in GUI package managers instead of the actual, and ugly (for the newbies), CP or CPV. It would be just a small addition that would make a big diff. So? -- Fabio Erculiani

Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: Application name in metadata.xml

2012-02-11 Thread Fabio Erculiani
On Sat, Feb 11, 2012 at 2:27 PM, Michał Górny mgo...@gentoo.org wrote: On Sat, 11 Feb 2012 14:00:38 +0100 Fabio Erculiani lx...@gentoo.org wrote: I think this is not the first time it's been discussed here, but maybe I'm wrong. Other distros associate a more user-friendly package name

Re: [gentoo-dev] We need *you* for a USE=selinux dependency

2011-12-07 Thread Fabio Erculiani
. -- Fabio Erculiani

Re: [gentoo-dev] We need *you* for a USE=selinux dependency

2011-12-04 Thread Fabio Erculiani
install at some point, you should rather use PDEPEND, but if the same is required earlier in the schedule, well, you're flooked. -- Fabio Erculiani http://lxnay.com

Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] enable verbose build whenever it's possible

2011-11-05 Thread Fabio Erculiani
/libtool command, which is often mostly noise. And writing to std{out,err} is expensive! ;-) -- ~Nirbheek Chauhan Gentoo GNOME+Mozilla Team -- Fabio Erculiani http://lxnay.com

Re: [gentoo-dev] linux-info.eclass: check_extra_config requires a configured kernel

2011-11-04 Thread Fabio Erculiani
Anything using /proc/config.gz is broken. For the following reasons: 1) could be not available (CONFIG not enabled) 2) doesn't reflect the kernel you're compiling against (chrooted env, multiple kernels on the system, etc) -- Fabio Erculiani

Re: [gentoo-dev] linux-info.eclass: check_extra_config requires a configured kernel

2011-11-04 Thread Fabio Erculiani
pkg_setup() is shared between binpkgs and srcpkgs, and often it ends up containing stuff that should be rather placed into src_{prepare,configure,whatever}. -- Fabio Erculiani http://lxnay.com

Re: [gentoo-dev] linux-info.eclass: check_extra_config requires a configured kernel

2011-11-04 Thread Fabio Erculiani
On Fri, Nov 4, 2011 at 10:18 PM, Robin H. Johnson robb...@gentoo.org wrote: On Fri, Nov 04, 2011 at 04:11:42PM +0100, Fabio Erculiani wrote: On Fri, Nov 4, 2011 at 3:46 PM, Mike Gilbert flop...@gentoo.org wrote: It is good that we warn users about this when they install the package, but I

Re: [gentoo-dev] linux-info.eclass: check_extra_config requires a configured kernel

2011-11-04 Thread Fabio Erculiani
On Fri, Nov 4, 2011 at 11:12 PM, Robin H. Johnson robb...@gentoo.org wrote: On Fri, Nov 04, 2011 at 11:02:18PM +0100, Fabio Erculiani wrote: The ONLY time that kernel config checks are fatal is when you're building kernel modules, and the module will fail to compile unless

[gentoo-dev] gdk-pixbuf-query-loaders usage in tree

2011-10-09 Thread Fabio Erculiani
/emul-linux-x86-gtklibs gnome-base/librsvg media-libs/libwmf others? -- Fabio Erculiani http://lxnay.com

[gentoo-dev] [RFC] virtual/polkit-agent virtual pkg

2011-09-06 Thread Fabio Erculiani
passwords, etc. But the same applet can be used in both GNOME and LXDE, making lxpolkit a better choice over polkit-gnome for the latter. My proposal is to create a virtual pkg listing all the polkit auth agent implementations and make pkgs depend on it. -- Fabio Erculiani

[gentoo-dev] genkernel unionfs

2011-08-28 Thread Fabio Erculiani
Hi, straight question. Is there anybody out there using genkernel-based kernels+initramfs and unionfs? The support inside genkernel is rotting and it would be nice to have it removed and replaced by aufs2, and by dm-snapshot afterwards (thanks to likewhoa for the advice). Cheers, -- Fabio

Re: [gentoo-dev] net-zope maintenance

2011-08-13 Thread Fabio Erculiani
On Sat, Aug 13, 2011 at 12:37 PM, Dirkjan Ochtman d...@gentoo.org wrote: Hi there, media-libs/FusionSound for whatever reason blocks net-zope/zodb probably file collisions. IIRC i've been hit by that long time ago. There should be also a bug about it. Cheers, Dirkjan -- Fabio

Re: [gentoo-dev] The fun of being a PDEPEND

2011-08-11 Thread Fabio Erculiani
On Thu, Aug 11, 2011 at 7:36 AM, Ciaran McCreesh ciaran.mccre...@googlemail.com wrote: On Wed, 10 Aug 2011 23:14:22 +0200 Fabio Erculiani lx...@gentoo.org wrote: I've intermittently spent my last two days trying to figure out a weird bug on Entropy dependency resolution algorithm (which

Re: [gentoo-dev] The fun of being a PDEPEND

2011-08-11 Thread Fabio Erculiani
. But beside the ASAP, do you agree that there is still a dependency issue? -- Thanks, Zac -- Fabio Erculiani

Re: [gentoo-dev] The fun of being a PDEPEND

2011-08-11 Thread Fabio Erculiani
a sane JDK environment. -- Fabio Erculiani http://lxnay.com

Re: [gentoo-dev] The fun of being a PDEPEND

2011-08-11 Thread Fabio Erculiani
On Thu, Aug 11, 2011 at 10:24 AM, Ulrich Mueller u...@gentoo.org wrote: On Thu, 11 Aug 2011, Fabio Erculiani wrote: Generally, you cannot rely on any dependency (outside of the system set) being present in pkg_setup: http://dev.gentoo.org/~ulm/pms/head/pms.html#x1-720008 Ulrich You may

[gentoo-dev] The fun of being a PDEPEND

2011-08-10 Thread Fabio Erculiani
. a way to have some handy packages being pulled in at some point (audacious plugins?) Who is this poor little PDEPEND? I think it's time to take action and fix the gray area around PDEPENDs, or at least clarify the fact to us developers. -- Fabio Erculiani

  1   2   >