Piotr Jaroszyński <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Current html version available here:
> http://dev.gentoo.org/~peper/glep-0054.html
Until reading the abstract, I thought this was Scheme related.
I'd suggest "-vc" (version controlled) or "-vcs" instead.
(...not that it matters much, of course.)
-
Markus Meier writes:
> semantic-desktop: Semantic desktop allows for storage of digital
> information and its metadata to allow the user to express his personal
> mental models, making all in formation become intuitively accessible
I find this description pretty content-free and hand-wavy. I usu
Christian Faulhammer writes:
> please review attached news item.
> Title: Migration to X.org Server 1.5
Clearly wrong.
> Posted: 2009-04-06
Given that I'm currently dealing with the repercussions of not having
seen the migration guide until it failed mid-way through the emerge, and
portage seem
Ulrich Mueller writes:
> Well, I'd thought that last rites plus the message in package.mask
> were enough (it also mentions the URL of the migration guide).
> But of course it cannot harm to have a news item in addition.
Users don't follow gentoo-dev to see last-rites.
For whatever reason, I did
Christian Faulhammer writes:
> see attached test, please review.
Why not just an elog during install of the emacs-23 package itself?
--
...jsled
http://asynchronous.org/ - a=jsled; b=asynchronous.org; echo $...@${b}
pgpcNJYSyZsfW.pgp
Description: PGP signature
Christian Faulhammer writes:
> Josh Sled :
>> Christian Faulhammer writes:
>> > see attached test, please review.
>>
>> Why not just an elog during install of the emacs-23 package itself?
>
> Because nobody reads them
If one doesn't read elog, which i
Christian Faulhammer writes:
> Fewer people know about the elogging functionality than about their
> display of "You have 1 unread news item".
Where do you expect them to see the unread news item message? Honestly
curious … I don't believe portage shows them, and – looking at the
Handbook – new
Samuli Suominen writes:
> I've been asked to write a news item for jpeg upgrade by few developers.
> Personally I don't see it's required, it's a default library upgrade,
> but here's my attempt:
[…]
> to libjpeg.so.7. This will break temporarily a lot of packages,
> including environments like Gn
Maciej Mrozowski writes:
> And I fail to see *any* point in forcing users to learn Gentoo internals
> (sic!
> like USE flags). What else? Ebuild syntax so that they're able to get to know
> what particular global USE flag is responsible for, when someone forgot (or
> decided not to) describe i
On Thu, 2007-04-26 at 20:03 -0600, Steve Dibb wrote:
> The idea came up a few months ago about creating a 'religion' herd. I
> finally
> got around to following through, and with robbat2's help, created the
> 'theology'
> herd.
>
> The basic description is to take care of packages relating to
On Tue, 2007-05-01 at 15:08 +0200, Piotr Jaroszyński wrote:
> Firstly each test can be(not all categories are mutually exclusive):
[...]
> - necessary
Could you qualify, please? Is this "necessary for the (non-test) build
artifact"?
If so, I'd not call it a test, just part of the build that's in
On Thu, May 17, 2007 12:53 pm, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
> 'Twas added to the tree at user request. Given that Java's basically a
> dead language and only being used for legacy applications now, it's
I'm having a hard time trying to figure out how you justify calling Java a
dead language.
--
...jsl
Grant Goodyear <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> got out of hand. Perhaps the goal was laudable, but the methods were
> not? (As an aside, I didn't realize that Roy's e-mail was supposed to
> be a proctor directive.) Or are people really looking for the proctors
> to get involved only when behavior
Gustavo Felisberto <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Any alternatives?
Ask Skype/upstream to change their behavior? For either the installer
mirroring or historical-version removal date.
If they're going through the trouble of producing a linux version, they
probably understand how distros work, a
Mike Doty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> devs can post, but any dev could moderate a non-dev post. devs who moderate
> in
> bad posts will be subject to moderation themselves. in addition the
What's the definition of "bad"?
--
...jsled
http://asynchronous.org/ - a=jsled; b=asynchronous.org; e
Wolfram Schlich <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> * Donnie Berkholz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-10-03 19:12]:
>> On 12:43 Wed 03 Oct , Wolfram Schlich wrote:
>> > And *please*, don't send such mails to this
>> > list *and* to my address in addition.
>>
>> You can add a procmail rule to detect duplic
16 matches
Mail list logo
