Bug: https://bugs.gentoo.org/698244
Signed-off-by: Nekun
---
Tried to be more compact and precise, as suggested in the Bugzilla discussion
// v2: fix some minor grammar issues
man/portage.5 | 12 ++--
1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
diff --git a/man/portage.5 b/man
More generally, it's a current shell directory (which can be changed in
a ebuild) and it can be overrided with -d, maybe we need more
clarification here. However, in the default src_prepare it's ${S}.
Bug: https://bugs.gentoo.org/698244
Signed-off-by: Nekun
---
man/ebuild.5 | 7 ---
1 file
More generally, it's a current shell directory (which can be changed in
a ebuild) and it can be overrided with -d, maybe we need more
clarification here. However, in the default src_prepare it's ${S}.
Bug: https://bugs.gentoo.org/698244
Signed-off-by: Nekun
---
man/ebuild.5 | 7 ---
1 file
Bug: https://bugs.gentoo.org/698244
Signed-off-by: Nekun
---
Tried to be more compact and precise, as suggested in the Bugzilla discussion
man/portage.5 | 12 ++--
1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
diff --git a/man/portage.5 b/man/portage.5
index 50f20454c..4e7d8c802
On 2021-04-22 21:23, Sam James wrote:
Such pkg_setups are best avoided if possible because they can be
confusing and we have other tools to handle it, so I’m glad you asked!
I’d provide a USE flag for this tool and mask it on non-multilib amd64
profiles (or mask everywhere and unmask on the
Ah, looks like attachment isn't attached, post my ebuild in plain text.
EAPI=7
inherit multilib toolchain-funcs
DESCRIPTION="Open source assembly language compiler"
HOMEPAGE="https://flatassembler.net;
SRC_URI="https://flatassembler.net/${P}.tgz;
LICENSE="MIT"
SLOT="0"
KEYWORDS="amd64 x86"
Hi all,
Working on the fasm ebuild, have some questions:
1. fasm is written on itself and has two variants: self-contained binary
for x86 and amd64 and linked with libc only for x86. Also, there are
tools for working with the proprietary symbolic information format which
is libc-linked and
Signed-off-by: Nekun
---
Also document eapply|eapply_user|PATCHES and fix override logic description
man/portage.5 | 31 +++
1 file changed, 31 insertions(+)
diff --git a/man/portage.5 b/man/portage.5
index 247ec5ab0..257dc9d17 100644
--- a/man/portage.5
+++ b/man
Signed-off-by: Nekun
---
man/ebuild.5 | 20
1 file changed, 20 insertions(+)
diff --git a/man/ebuild.5 b/man/ebuild.5
index 1afa59eef..460fc0069 100644
--- a/man/ebuild.5
+++ b/man/ebuild.5
@@ -799,6 +799,11 @@ Beginning with \fBEAPI 4\fR, an array or space\-delimited
list
Signed-off-by: Nekun
---
// seems like previous message has wrong Message-Id, resending
Starting from EAPI6, this is a built-in Portage functionality, maybe it
was not included in Portage documentation eralier because it was epatch.eclass
functionality which is exclusive for gentoo repo
Signed-off-by: Nekun
---
Starting from EAPI6, this is a built-in Portage functionality, maybe it
was not included in Portage documentation earlier because it was
epatch.eclass functionality which is exclusive for gentoo repo, but
according with today's mandatory "eapply_user"
On 2021-04-04 20:49, Zac Medico wrote:
Today, I count only 2445, or 8.3% of ebuilds have EAPI 5.
I imagine that the migration is moving along, since we deprecated EAPI
5
on 2020-11-26 here:
https://gitweb.gentoo.org/repo/gentoo.git/commit/?id=b2e281bb698eb93704e1987dc4df1cf2dd3c2cff
Hi all.
Recently, I start working on optional atom specifiers feature in
userpatch facility: if package directory name starts with percent sign,
following word threated as a regular Portage atom, e.g
"/etc/portage/patches/sys-kernel/%<=gentoo-sources-5.4" ==
13 matches
Mail list logo
