On 2007-01-30, Matthias Langer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> nope ... let's hope c++-0x comes out soon and that compiler vendors are
> faster in implementing it than c++-98.
It's actually officially called (skipping all the admin stuff): C++09
That gives a good indication of when it is likely to
On 2006-04-04, m h <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > You say it should be obvious like it's fact. Not everything is obvious
> > > to everyone--Not everyone is a Steve or Stephanie. They may interpret
> > > conveyed information in different ways and the ambiguity does not help
> > > at all.
> > It sh
On 2005-09-14, John N. Laliberte <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The GNOME herd is now ready for 2.12.0 to be tested.
> The gnome-2.12.0.ebuild should hit the mirrors shortly. ( just committed)
> Please see this document for information on how to test:
> http://dev.gentoo.org/~allanonjl/gnome/2.12
On 2005-05-09, Mike Frysinger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Monday 09 May 2005 08:35 am, Henrik Brix Andersen wrote:
> > On Thu, 2005-05-05 at 23:41 -0400, Aaron Walker wrote:
> > > There are a sleu of C++-only libs in dev-libs that IMO belong in dev-cpp:
> > dev-cpp sounds like stuff releated t
