> On 28 Nov 2021, at 23:26, Michael Orlitzky wrote:
> [sinp]
> The only problem that anyone has put forth is one that does not exist.
> UIDs and GIDs are still assigned dynamically in Gentoo. The number you
> type in the ebuild is only a hint: it's the first number that will be
> tried during
> On 27 Nov 2021, at 09:54, Miroslav Šulc wrote:
>
> hello devs,
>
> please find attached patch for upgrade of java-vm-2.eclass to support eapi 8.
> eapi 5 is not used by any package inheriting this eclass so i dropped it.
>
> i also attach update of the ebuilds of packages that use this
> On 25 Nov 2021, at 17:07, Thomas Deutschmann wrote:
>
> On 2021-11-25 18:01, Piotr Karbowski wrote:
>>> https://github.com/gentoo/gentoo/blob/master/sys-libs/glibc/glibc-2.34-r2.ebuild#L643
>> Would you see something like this on more ebuilds, postgres, mysql,
>> elasticsearch, or have
> On 25 Nov 2021, at 03:21, Thomas Deutschmann wrote:
>
> Bug: https://bugs.gentoo.org/825234
> Signed-off-by: Thomas Deutschmann
> ---
> [snip]
> +On 2021-11-21, a member of the QA project accidentially de-keyworded
> +MariaDB 10.6 to address a file collision, users, who also had latest
>
> On 25 Nov 2021, at 13:59, Thomas Deutschmann wrote:
> If you do a normal world upgrade, this is the default portage behavior, not?
> I.e. package manager will downgrade if you don't stop. And especially on
> servers, people tend to use cronjobs/scripts to do that...
I would really not
> On 25 Nov 2021, at 13:37, Thomas Deutschmann wrote:
> For the records:
> I hope that this news item won't get delayed by the recent ComRel bug someone
> filled against me regarding this news item.
No need to reference that here. Please keep that to e.g. -core.
> While we often rush with
# Volkmar W. Pogatzki (2021-11-23)
# Does not support updated dev-java/pdfbox-2.0.24, Bug #803488
# Blocks (CVE-2018-11797, CVE-2021-{27807,27906,31811,31812})
dev-tex/pdfannotextractor
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP
# Volkmar W. Pogatzki (2021-11-15)
# Library without consumers,
# bug #771693 (multiple CVEs); Removal in 30 days.
dev-java/jackson
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP
# Volkmar W. Pogatzki (2021-11-13)
# java package without consumers, bug #787338. Removal in 30 days.
dev-db/db-je
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP
# Volkmar W. Pogatzki (2021-11-13)
# depends on deprecated jdk / jre, bug #787449
# stuck with EAPI 5, latest release in 2005
# Removal in 30 days.
net-analyzer/neti
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP
[Resending due to mail client nonsense...]
> On 11 Nov 2021, at 18:44, Patrick McLean wrote:
> On Thu, 11 Nov 2021 09:55:48 -0800
> Patrick McLean mailto:chutz...@gentoo.org>> wrote:
>> On Thu, 11 Nov 2021 17:05:45 +0100
>> Michał Górny wrote:
>>> I'd like to add some dates regarding 3.8
>
>
> On 11 Nov 2021, at 18:40, Patrick McLean wrote:
>
> On Thu, 11 Nov 2021 12:58:24 -0500
> "Wolfgang E. Sanyer" wrote:
>
>> El jue, 11 de nov. de 2021 12:56 p. m., Patrick McLean
>> escribió:
>>
>>> On Thu, 11 Nov 2021 17:05:45 +0100
>>> Michał Górny wrote:
I'd like to add some dates
> On 8 Nov 2021, at 11:18, Michał Górny wrote:
> Hi,
> A few years back I've slotted LLVM and Clang to make the life with
> revdeps easier. Long story short, every major LLVM release (which
> happens twice a year) breaks API and it takes some time for revdeps to
> adjust. Slotting made it
On 4 Nov 2021, at 00:02, Sam James wrote:
>> On 3 Nov 2021, at 23:53, Aaron Bauman wrote:
>> Is that where the policy belongs?
>> If so, shouldn't the council update it based on their decisions?
>> "patches are welcome" doesn't fit every scenario.
>
> On 3 Nov 2021, at 23:53, Aaron Bauman wrote:
> Is that where the policy belongs?
> If so, shouldn't the council update it based on their decisions?
> "patches are welcome" doesn't fit every scenario.
Got to agree here. If there's a gap in the documentation,
let's file a bug -- irrespective
> On 3 Nov 2021, at 20:16, Rich Freeman wrote:
> It probably would be good to get these policies documented someplace
> OTHER than the council decision logs. I do remember the discussion
> from the distant past but it is worth having it in a more prominent
> place, especially since a one year
> On 3 Nov 2021, at 22:15, Joshua Kinard wrote:
> Actually, it is possible to manage dependency errors like those. It just
> takes a *lot* of elbow grease, and and long, long time time. Especially if
> you have museum-grade hardware that these errors are happening on.
>
> For Perl, I've
> On 3 Nov 2021, at 15:03, Thomas Deutschmann wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> it is currently not possible to smoothly run a world upgrade on a 4 months
> old system which doesn't even have a complicated package list:
> [snip]
>
> This is not about finding solution to upgrade the system (in this case it
Hi,
toolchain@ would appreciate if folks could keyword glibc-2.34 locally
on non-production machines to help root out any bugs.
The tracker bug is doing pretty well at this point with most remaining
issues being in last-rited packages or being tracked upstream:
https://bugs.gentoo.org/803482.
> On 15 Oct 2021, at 16:00, xgqt wrote:
>
> Hi!
>
> I'm having a problem with guile packages and portage QA checks.
> Guile puts the compiled bytecode into the /usr/lib64 directory which produces
> a portage warning that unrecognized ELF files are being installed.
>
> Example bug reports:
>
Hi,
net-misc/httpie is up for grabs as a result
of the proxied maintainer retiring.
Will need a stablereq soon but other than that,
in a great state.
Best,
sam
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP
# Sam James (2021-10-25)
# Fails to build with glibc-2.34 and binutils-2.34+. Not many other
# distros packaging this and no upstream commits since 2011. No reverse
# dependencies.
# bug #707848, bug #806476. Removal on 2021-11-25.
dev-util/mutrace
signature.asc
Description: Message signed
# Sam James (2021-10-25)
# Fails to build with glibc-2.34 and appears to be obsolete. No
# reverse dependencies.
# bug #806079. Removal on 2021-11-25.
sys-libs/libhugetlbfs
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP
# Sam James (2021-10-25)
# Fails to build with glibc-2.33 and no activity upstream; seems like
# a new fork should be packaged.
# bug #775962. Removal on 2021-11-25.
sys-apps/mtree
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP
# Sam James (2021-10-25)
# Fails to build with glibc-2.30(!) and was abandoned upstream
# a few years ago. No reverse dependencies in tree.
# bug #728556. Removal on 2021-11-25.
dev-perl/MongoDB
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP
> On 21 Oct 2021, at 18:04, Aaron Bauman wrote:
>
> On Thu, Oct 21, 2021 at 10:05:20AM +0200, Micha=C5=82 G=C3=B3rny wrote:
>> Hello,
>> =20
>> Splitting from the discussion in [1] (moving more arhitectures to
>> ~arch), I'd like to propose that we remove the "security supported"
>>
> On 23 Oct 2021, at 14:40, Sam James wrote:
>
>
>
>> On 23 Oct 2021, at 02:55, Thomas Deutschmann wrote:
>>
>> On 2021-10-21 17:16, Mike Gilbert wrote:
>>> On Thu, Oct 21, 2021 at 4:05 AM Michał Górny wrote:
>>>> 4. In the end
> On 23 Oct 2021, at 02:55, Thomas Deutschmann wrote:
>
> On 2021-10-21 17:16, Mike Gilbert wrote:
>> On Thu, Oct 21, 2021 at 4:05 AM Michał Górny wrote:
>>> 4. In the end, Security team isn't really respecting this policy.
>>> In the end, this leads to absurdities like GLSA being released
> On 19 Oct 2021, at 00:24, Francesco Riosa wrote:
>
> Sorry but portage is too strictly related to the ebuilds in tree, recent
> removal of EAPI=5 from most eclasses underlined that.
> Or to put id differently if you want a LTS portage you also need a certain
> number of "protected"
> On 18 Oct 2021, at 01:50, Sam James wrote:
>
>
>
>> On 14 Oct 2021, at 14:40, Marek Szuba wrote:
>>
>> Dear everyone,
>>
>> Following some private discussions, I feel quite strongly now that it would
>> both considerably impro
> On 14 Oct 2021, at 14:40, Marek Szuba wrote:
>
> Dear everyone,
>
> Following some private discussions, I feel quite strongly now that it would
> both considerably improve certain processes and make our use of limited
> manpower more efficient were we to further reduce the number of
# Sam James (2021-10-16)
# Fails to compile with modern OCaml
# bug #704464, bug #780090
# Removal on 2021-11-16.
app-text/htmlc
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP
# Sam James (2021-10-17)
# Fails to build with glibc 2.34 and no reverse dependencies.
# bug #806508
# Removal on 2021-11-17.
dev-cpp/rttr
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP
# Sam James (2021-10-15)
# Drop broken packages with no reverse dependencies
# Removal on 2021-11-15. bug #817965, bug #771756, bug #767196
dev-ml/async_ssl
dev-ml/ppx_tools_versioned
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP
This breaks at least ocamlopt.
Closes: https://bugs.gentoo.org/803047
Closes: https://bugs.gentoo.org/811315
Signed-off-by: Sam James
---
eclass/opam.eclass | 2 ++
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
diff --git a/eclass/opam.eclass b/eclass/opam.eclass
index 262d726a8a7a2..6b9d43204206d 100644
This breaks at least ocamlopt.
Closes: https://bugs.gentoo.org/803047
Closes: https://bugs.gentoo.org/811315
Signed-off-by: Sam James
---
eclass/findlib.eclass | 2 ++
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
diff --git a/eclass/findlib.eclass b/eclass/findlib.eclass
index 3b19b30c57c9b..6239beccb7a43
This breaks at least ocamlopt.
Closes: https://bugs.gentoo.org/803047
Closes: https://bugs.gentoo.org/811315
Signed-off-by: Sam James
---
eclass/dune.eclass | 3 +++
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)
diff --git a/eclass/dune.eclass b/eclass/dune.eclass
index 02a8a870ef43e..8a6e01893932a 100644
://bugs.gentoo.org/816303
Signed-off-by: Sam James
---
lib/_emerge/actions.py | 34 ++
1 file changed, 22 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
diff --git a/lib/_emerge/actions.py b/lib/_emerge/actions.py
index 05a115250..1b40bebd3 100644
--- a/lib/_emerge/actions.py
+++ b/lib
> On 6 Oct 2021, at 19:05, Duncan <1i5t5.dun...@cox.net> wrote:
>
> Sam James posted on Sat, 2 Oct 2021 21:11:56 +0100 as excerpted:
>
>> This makes things a bit less confusing and tries to avoid users focusing
>> on (soft) blocks which aren't actually the p
Hi,
Putting app-text/mupdf up for grabs because I've not used it for a while.
It needs a version bump (1.19.0) and some minor patches rebasing.
Please note that anyone taking this over should keep an eye on upstream's
git occasionally to look for security relevant patches.
Best,
sam
> On 5 Oct 2021, at 18:43, Mike Gilbert wrote:
>
> Signed-off-by: Mike Gilbert
> ---
> .../2021-10-08-openssh-rsa-sha1.en.txt| 26 +++
> 1 file changed, 26 insertions(+)
> create mode 100644
> 2021-10-08-openssh-rsa-sha1/2021-10-08-openssh-rsa-sha1.en.txt
>
> diff
he GitHub-pages type route.
But I'm open to the idea of just recommending people
use that if there's no appetite for mixed types.
> -A
>
> On Tue, Oct 5, 2021 at 11:28 AM Sam James wrote:
>>
>> This is a preliminary version/draft of a proposed change to
>> GLEP
a maintainer.
Signed-off-by: Sam James
---
glep-0068.rst | 26 +++---
1 file changed, 23 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/glep-0068.rst b/glep-0068.rst
index 83e54d9..21bdf2a 100644
--- a/glep-0068.rst
+++ b/glep-0068.rst
@@ -4,10 +4,10 @@ Title: Package and category
This is a preliminary version/draft of a proposed change to
GLEP 68.
I'd like to introduce a method for developers to signal anything
special about a package and how to correctly maintain it.
Sam James (1):
glep-0068: Add notes element for package maintenance instructions
glep-0068.rst | 26
Hi all,
Chainsaw asked retirement@ to drop him to maintainer-needed on his packages, so
here's the resultant
packages with no maintainers left:
app-admin/ansible-lint
app-arch/rpm
dev-python/progressbar2
dev-python/pytest-flakes
dev-python/requests-credssp
net-libs/iax
net-misc/arpsponge
{,.ELF.2} or those files may be missing entirely,
resulting in a corrupt state both on the system and in
any generated binpkgs.
Adds an escape variable (PORTAGE_NO_SCANELF_CHECK) to allow
re-emerging pax-utils if it's broken.
Bug: https://bugs.gentoo.org/811462
Signed-off-by: Sam James
---
bin/misc
Posted at https://github.com/gentoo/portage/pull/750 originally
and merged in 3.0.24, but posting here for posterity.
Related to the general preserve-libs issues I've been working on.
Sam James (1):
bin/misc-function.sh: check scanelf return code
bin/misc-functions.sh | 64
This makes things a bit less confusing and tries to avoid
users focusing on (soft) blocks which aren't actually
the problem they're hitting.
Signed-off-by: Sam James
---
lib/_emerge/resolver/output_helpers.py | 2 ++
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
diff --git a/lib/_emerge/resolver
lar-List-Utils-1.550.0-r999" is soft blocking
virtual/perl-Scalar-List-Utils-1.550.0)
```
This should make it a little bit clearer when a block matters,
especially given we already explicitly say 'hard blocking'
for the opposite case.
Signed-off-by: Sam James
---
lib/_emerge/resolver/out
that e.g. scanelf malfunctioned or some corruption occurred.
Bug: https://bugs.gentoo.org/811462
Signed-off-by: Sam James
---
lib/_emerge/Binpkg.py | 28 +++-
1 file changed, 27 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/lib/_emerge/Binpkg.py b/lib/_emerge/Binpkg.py
index
. scanelf malfunctioned or some corruption occurred.
Bug: https://bugs.gentoo.org/811462
Signed-off-by: Sam James
---
lib/portage/package/ebuild/doebuild.py | 24 +++-
1 file changed, 23 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/lib/portage/package/ebuild/doebuild.py
b/lib
Further fixes for when the VDB is corrupted by e.g. broken scanelf.
Already posted on GH a while ago at https://github.com/gentoo/portage/pull/744.
Sam James (2):
doebuild.py: check for inconsistent PROVIDES/image post-src_install
Binpkg.py: check for inconsistent PROVIDES/image when
> On 27 Sep 2021, at 23:50, Robin H. Johnson wrote:
>
> Deadline for responses: 2021/10/14!
>
> The Foundation would like to propose that RedHat/Fedora "hobble" patch
> presently applied when USE=bindist is true shall be removed from
> dev-libs/openssl.
>
> RedHat's stated reasons for the
> On 29 Sep 2021, at 22:52, A Schenck wrote:
>
> [snip]
> Didn't expect to be the only dissenting opinion on something like this
> but. . . Some applications parse portage output looking for these
> 'zings'. At very least app-portage/kuroo does it this way; there must be
> others, right? This
> On 25 Sep 2021, at 20:44, Joshua Kinard wrote:
>
>> [snip]
>>
>> ECDSA and the NIST curves have been around since > 20 years, so it's
>> simply impossible that there are any valid patents covering those.
>> (There is of course a slight possibility that there may be patents
>> covering
Bug: https://bugs.gentoo.org/811462
Signed-off-by: Hank Leininger
Signed-off-by: Sam James
---
...sible-failure-to-preserve-libraries.en.txt | 103 ++
1 file changed, 103 insertions(+)
create mode 100644
2021-09-24-possible-failure-to-preserve-libraries/2021-09-24-possible
Bug: https://bugs.gentoo.org/811462
Signed-off-by: Hank Leininger
Signed-off-by: Sam James
---
...sible-failure-to-preserve-libraries.en.txt | 98 +++
1 file changed, 98 insertions(+)
create mode 100644
2021-09-24-possible-failure-to-preserve-libraries/2021-09-24-possible
> On 9 Sep 2021, at 20:47, Mike Gilbert wrote:
>
> busybox[static] was added to @system as a system recovery tool.
>
> If the system is in such a state that a static shell is needed for
> recovery, it is likely that remote access is also broken, and the
> sysadmin will need to log into a
> On 7 Sep 2021, at 23:51, Mike wrote:
>
> Linux 2.4 and gcc 4 are long gone from the tree
> Remove some log lines
>
>
Good riddance!
Thanks.
> Signed-off-by: Mike Pagano
> ---
> eclass/linux-info.eclass | 15 ---
> 1 file changed, 15 deletions(-)
>
Best,
sam
signature.asc
> On 2 Sep 2021, at 20:42, Mike Pagano wrote:
>
> Support the possibility that the Makefile could be
> one of the following and should be checked in
> the order described here:
>
> https://www.gnu.org/software/make/manual/make.html
>
> Order of checking and valid Makefiles names:
>
> On 29 Aug 2021, at 21:06, Ulrich Müller wrote:
>
> Reinstate the QA notice, because Portage behavior deviates from PMS,
> and breakage of eclasses with Pkgcore has been observed recently.
>
> This reverts commit f44d32550861cb25c209ef61dcd7ae1aa230da1f.
>
> Bug:
> On 29 Aug 2021, at 19:44, Michał Górny wrote:
>
> On Sun, 2021-08-29 at 14:41 -0400, Ionen Wolkens wrote:
>>> [snip]
>>
>> If anything I'd personally prefer the rough opposite of this, in the
>> event multiple eclass export the same, have the package manager merge
>> them.
>>
>> e.g.
> On 29 Aug 2021, at 19:41, Ionen Wolkens wrote:
>
> On Sun, Aug 29, 2021 at 12:23:22PM -0500, William Hubbs wrote:
>> On Sat, Aug 28, 2021 at 06:35:06PM +0200, Michał Górny wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> I've been informed of a slight inconsistency in package manager behavior
>>> that affects
> On 24 Aug 2021, at 11:24, Jaco Kroon wrote:
>
> Hi All,
>
> We run glibc based systems. No musl. But we don't use systemd.
>
> As little as a year back we still ran into issues with systemd-udev
> variant breaking systems, the fix of course was to nuke it and install
> eudev. Are we
> On 22 Aug 2021, at 21:14, Anthony G. Basile wrote:
>
> [snip]
>
>
> Title: eudev retirement on 2022-01-01
> Author: Anthony G. Basile
> Posted: 2021-08-xx
> Revision: 1
> News-Item-Format: 2.0
> Display-If-Installed: sys-fs/eudev
>
Let's mention that people should double check if
> On 19 Aug 2021, at 00:36, Sam James wrote:
>
> # Sam James (2021-08-18)
> # Fails to build with glibc-2.34. End of maintenance
> # upstream was declared in 2007. Several other serious
> # bugs open. Removal on 2021-09-19.
> # bug #711088, bug #775944, bug #79068
# Sam James (2021-08-18)
# Fails to build with glibc-2.34. End of maintenance
# upstream was declared in 2007. Several other serious
# bugs open. Removal on 2021-09-19.
# bug #711088, bug #775944, bug #790680, bug #806953.
net-analyzer/netwox
signature.asc
Description: Message signed
# Sam James (2021-08-17)
# Fails to build with >= Boost 1.73, so broken for well over a year.
# Several open bugs: bug #722882, bug #742290, bug #808673.
# Removal on 2021-09-17.
sys-fs/e4rat
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP
> On 17 Aug 2021, at 16:19, Joshua Kinard wrote:
> [snip]
>
> According to the uClibc-ng website, 1.0.38 was released earlier this year
> (March 27th). Was an announcement put out somewhere about the project not
> being maintained any further beyond that release, or has it gone quiet after
>
See https://bugs.gentoo.org/802786 and https://github.com/gentoo/kde/pull/903.
There's some work to be done first.
> On 16 Aug 2021, at 17:43, Marek Szuba wrote:
>
> Signed-off-by: Marek Szuba
> ---
> eclass/cmake.eclass | 4 ++--
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff
From: Georgy Yakovlev
See:
https://archives.gentoo.org/gentoo-dev/message/7bdfdc9a7560fd07436defd0253af0b8
Signed-off-by: Georgy Yakovlev
Signed-off-by: Sam James
---
metadata/install-qa-check.d/60tmpfiles-paths | 34 ++--
1 file changed, 24 insertions(+), 10 deletions
://archives.gentoo.org/gentoo-dev/message/0a96793036a4fdd9ac311a46950d7e7b
Signed-off-by: Sam James
---
metadata/install-qa-check.d/60tmpfiles-paths | 8
1 file changed, 8 insertions(+)
diff --git a/metadata/install-qa-check.d/60tmpfiles-paths
b/metadata/install-qa-check.d/60tmpfiles-paths
index
It's okay to use "keepdir" on /etc/tmpfiles.d.
See:
https://archives.gentoo.org/gentoo-dev/message/50558b55dc34f37b238807fc4759640d
Signed-off-by: Sam James
---
metadata/install-qa-check.d/60tmpfiles-paths | 7 ++-
1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git
not calling tmpfiles_process
in pkg_postinst).
Signed-off-by: Sam James
---
metadata/install-qa-check.d/60tmpfiles-paths | 37
1 file changed, 37 insertions(+)
create mode 100644 metadata/install-qa-check.d/60tmpfiles-paths
diff --git a/metadata/install-qa-check.d/60tmpfiles-paths
> On 12 Aug 2021, at 16:17, Agostino Sarubbo wrote:
>
> On giovedì 12 agosto 2021 14:53:33 CEST Michał Górny wrote:
>> To resolve these problems going forward and establish consistent
>> behavior in the future, I'd like to propose to disable 'package list'
>> fields on security bugs and
> On 12 Aug 2021, at 23:35, William Hubbs wrote:
>
> I spoke with several people on the #gentoo-hardened channel and no one
> knows of any place where these profiles are being used.
>
> I'll apply this patch early on Aug 16 UTC if no one objects.
>
I should've thought about this earlier,
> On 6 Aug 2021, at 23:27, Louis Sautier wrote:
>
> On 06/08/2021 02:57, Alec Warner wrote:
>> On Thu, Aug 5, 2021 at 2:44 PM Georgy Yakovlev wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> We've been collecting more and more container related packages in
>>> app-emulation/*
>>>
>>> What do you think about finally
# Sam James (2021-08-05)
# Fails to build with GCC 11. No activity upstream.
# bug #740308, bug #789816. Removal on 2021-09-05.
app-eselect/eselect-audicle
app-eselect/eselect-miniaudicle
media-sound/audicle
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP
# Sam James (2021-08-04)
# Fails to build with GCC 11. No activity upstream since 2008.
# bug #730692, bug #787866. Removal on 2021-09-04.
dev-scheme/ypsilon
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP
# Sam James (2021-08-04)
# Fails to build with GCC 11. Library with no reverse-dependencies.
# bug #731254, bug #787905. Removal on 2021-09-04.
net-libs/openmq-cclient
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP
# Sam James (2021-08-04)
# Fails to build with GCC 11, no activity upstream.
# bug #786738. Removal on 2021-09-04.
app-dicts/kasumi
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP
# Sam James (2021-08-04)
# Fails to build with GCC 11, no activity upstream.
# bug #729106, bug #786648. Removal on 2021-09-04.
app-backup/zbackup
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP
# Sam James (2021-08-04)
# Fails to build with GCC 11, large number of open bugs,
# no activity upstream. bug #692806, bug #694674, bug #712832,
# bug #725166, bug #740792, bug #788637, bug #798042.
# Removal on 2021-09-04.
net-misc/stargazer
signature.asc
Description: Message signed
# Fails to build with GCC 11 and has Boost incompatibility issues.
# bug #741646, bug #792993. Removal on 2021-09-04.
sci-physics/sassena
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP
> On 4 Aug 2021, at 03:39, Thomas Deutschmann wrote:
>
> On 2021-08-01 01:56, Sam James wrote:
>> 1) Verify packages don't install tmpfiles to /etc/tmpfiles.d, which
>> is a deprecated location;
>
> This location is _not_ deprecated.
>
> This is
# Sam James (2021-08-01)
# Broken with GCC 11, out of date, unmaintained in Gentoo.
# bug #763651, bug #774009, bug #789027, bug #759988.
# Removal on 2021-09-01.
dev-util/intel-graphics-compiler
dev-libs/intel-neo
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP
# Sam James (2021-08-01)
# Fails to compile, multiple open bugs.
# No activity upstream since 2015.
# bug #570484, bug #715412, bug #723204.
# Removal on 2021-09-01.
sys-apps/lmctfy
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP
# Sam James (2021-08-01)
# Fails to build with network-sandbox and variety
# of other open bugs. Unmaintained.
# bug #632638, bug #688530, bug #709992, bug #757768,
# bug #796920. Removal on 2021-09-01.
sys-apps/habitat
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP
> On 1 Aug 2021, at 17:42, Mike Gilbert wrote:
>
> On Sat, Jul 31, 2021 at 7:56 PM Sam James wrote:
>>
>> This adds two tmpfiles related QA checks:
>> 1) Verify packages don't install tmpfiles to /etc/tmpfiles.d, which
>> is a deprecated location;
>
&
> On 1 Aug 2021, at 00:23, Joshua Kinard wrote:
>
>> [snip]
>
> Yeah, I found one mention in the Wiki[1], but not under "Profiles" in the
> devmanual[2]. The Wiki description doesn't say why that file is needed in
> every single subdirectory.
>
> [1]
in pkg_postinst).
Signed-off-by: Sam James
---
metadata/install-qa-check.d/60tmpfiles-paths | 37
1 file changed, 37 insertions(+)
create mode 100644 metadata/install-qa-check.d/60tmpfiles-paths
diff --git a/metadata/install-qa-check.d/60tmpfiles-paths
b/metadata/install
> On 31 Jul 2021, at 23:42, Joshua Kinard wrote:
>
>
> I can't find much documentation on the 'eapi' file found in many of the
> profile directories. Several of the ones in
> profiles/arch/{amd64,sparc,mips} all report '5', and this aligns with the
> mips 17.0 profile under default/linux.
> On 18 Jul 2021, at 19:44, Michał Górny wrote:
>
> Signed-off-by: Michał Górny
> ---
> eclass/verify-sig.eclass | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> [snip]
> # BDEPEND="
> # verify-sig? ( app-crypt/openpgp-keys-example )"
> #
> -#
> On 23 Jul 2021, at 07:44, Andreas Sturmlechner wrote:
>
> Signed-off-by: Andreas Sturmlechner
> ---
> eclass/optfeature.eclass | 8
> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> [snip]
lgtm.
best,
sam
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP
> On 27 Jul 2021, at 13:32, David Seifert wrote:
>
> Signed-off-by: David Seifert
> ---
> .../2021-08-01-tcpd-disabled.en.txt | 62 +++
> 1 file changed, 62 insertions(+)
> create mode 100644 2021-08-01-tcpd-disabled/2021-08-01-tcpd-disabled.en.txt
>
> diff --git
> On 26 Jul 2021, at 16:01, Joshua Kinard wrote:
>
>>> [snip]
>>
>> I'd still prefer it if we just didn't provide the USE flag on irrelevant
>> kernels (it's too confusing) but if you plan on removing this
>> message at some point, I guess we can keep it?
>
> I think the message text for
# Sam James (2021-07-26)
# Fails to build with GCC 11. No activity upstream.
# Removal on 2021-08-26. bug #740536, bug #624746.
media-sound/tapestrea
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP
# Sam James (2021-07-26)
# Fails to build with GCC 11.
# Removal on 2021-08-26. bug #788577.
net-im/minbif
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP
# Sam James (2021-07-26)
# Rather out of date, several open bugs, fails to build with GCC 11.
# Removal in 2021-08-26.
# bug #793020, bug #692976, bug #741600, bug #703948, bug #674334.
sci-misc/tango
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP
# Sam James (2021-07-26)
# No activity upstream. No reverse dependencies (library).
# Fails to build with GCC 11.
# Removal on 2021-08-26. bug #787113, bug #735714, bug #657510.
dev-cpp/libxsd-frontend
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP
601 - 700 of 827 matches
Mail list logo
