ke the
default-darwin profiles which use ARCH="ppc" and USE="ppc-macos" but the
ppc-macos flag can be removed by using USE="-ppc-macos" in the
environment. Or selinux profiles, to force the selinux flag to be turned
on.
Comments?
Cheers,
Sven
--
Sven Wegener
Gento
st the
cascading aspect of the profiles.
> Question: with use.force, what happens if a flag is both masked and
> forced? Does it get turned on, get turned off, or get portage to
> complain and abort?
Good question. I would prefer to turn the flag off and make portage
print a message.
package.mask.
That's rarely used, but that's the way cascading profile work in
portage.
May the force be with you,
Sven
--
Sven Wegener
Gentoo Linux Developer
http://www.gentoo.org/
pgpigbISibGmy.pgp
Description: PGP signature
On Mon, Jun 13, 2005 at 03:40:34PM -0500, Kito wrote:
> what about just a use.env?
I find that a little bit misleading. Sounds like "use this environment"
or so.
Sven
--
Sven Wegener
Gentoo Linux Developer
http://www.gentoo.org/
pgpjQajdyL9gj.pgp
Description: PGP signature
On Mon, Jun 13, 2005 at 05:08:09PM -0400, Alec Warner wrote:
> Sven Wegener wrote:
>
> >use.force might not be the best name, but it's what we do with it for
> >most of our users. Being able to -flag in /etc/portage/profile/use.force
> >is just because /etc/port
On Wed, Jun 15, 2005 at 01:34:05AM +0300, Sami N??t?nen wrote:
> On Monday 13 June 2005 23:54, Sven Wegener wrote:
> > On Mon, Jun 13, 2005 at 03:40:34PM -0500, Kito wrote:
> > > what about just a use.env?
> >
> > I find that a little bit misleading. Sounds like &q
On Tue, Jun 14, 2005 at 01:46:22PM -0400, Alec Warner wrote:
> Sven Wegener wrote:
> >On Mon, Jun 13, 2005 at 05:08:09PM -0400, Alec Warner wrote:
> >
> >>Sven Wegener wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >>>use.force might not be the best name, but it's w
gestions in this thread, but
none of them actually matched the purpose of the file. At least in my
opinion. use.force matches it best, but the "force" part is a quite hard
term. How about use.profile? Because these USE flags are activated or
needed by the profile.
--
Sven Wegener
Gentoo
On Tue, Jun 14, 2005 at 07:50:13PM -0700, Donnie Berkholz wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Sven Wegener wrote:
> > On Mon, Jun 13, 2005 at 06:56:43PM -0400, Ned Ludd wrote:
> >
> >>I'm in favor of this. Would you mind calling it
On Wed, Jun 15, 2005 at 12:16:18PM +0200, Thomas de Grenier de Latour wrote:
> On Mon, 13 Jun 2005 16:40:48 +0200
> Sven Wegener <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > We just had a short discussion over in #gentoo-portage and the
> > idea of an use.force file for profil
ent USE settings. Same is for LINGUAS, but using
the USE flags the user knows on emerge -pv with which language support
the package was compiled.
Sven
--
Sven Wegener
Gentoo Linux Developer
http://www.gentoo.org/
pgp39zvYjMEer.pgp
Description: PGP signature
But please one after the other, this is just an
initial test.
Cheers,
Sven
--
Sven Wegener
Gentoo Developer
http://www.gentoo.org/
pgphkVXD5qV5M.pgp
Description: PGP signature
DEPEND
only.
Sven
--
Sven Wegener
Gentoo Developer
http://www.gentoo.org/
pgp4Pqd482Pq6.pgp
Description: PGP signature
On Tue, Jul 05, 2005 at 06:19:01PM -0700, Robin H. Johnson wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 06, 2005 at 02:00:24AM +0200, Sven Wegener wrote:
> [snip]
> Could you possibly split the stuff into two files?
> one for RDEPEND.only and one for DEPEND.only?
http://dev.gentoo.org/~swegener/qa/depen
h
check is done to catch runtime-dependencies being in DEPEND but missing
in RDEPEND and the other way round.
Sven
--
SVen Wegener
Gentoo Developer
http://www.gentoo.org/
pgpsTQuY7LF0Q.pgp
Description: PGP signature
more attention and result in cleaner dependencies.
- eclasses don't have the automatic RDEPEND=DEPEND thing, the change
will streamline ebuilds and eclasses to be treated equally.
Cheers,
Sven
--
Sven Wegener
Gentoo Developer
http://www.gentoo.org/
pgpvSMIMrVoek.pgp
Description: PGP signature
in
a much better way.
Regards,
Sven
[1] ./configure && make && make install
--
Sven Wegener
Gentoo Developer
http://www.gentoo.org/
pgp1wcyK7Q2kr.pgp
Description: PGP signature
[1] support and it might as well be used to get
backward compatibility for the RDEPEND=DEPEND[2] changes.
Cheers,
Sven
[1] http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.gentoo.devel/29510
[2] http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.gentoo.devel/29509
--
Sven Wegener
Gentoo Developer
http://www.gentoo.org
On Wed, Jul 06, 2005 at 08:14:55PM -0400, Aron Griffis wrote:
> Sven Wegener wrote: [Wed Jul 06 2005, 08:04:04PM EDT]
> > I'm writing this mail to bring you a thought we had over on freenode
> > in the #gentoo-portage channel. We would like to split up
> > src_comp
On Wed, Jul 06, 2005 at 08:41:43PM -0400, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> On Wednesday 06 July 2005 08:20 pm, Sven Wegener wrote:
> > We would like to introduce a new ebuild variable named EBUILD_FORMAT,
>
> seems like the name is much longer than it needs to be ... what's wro
es that count as being addicted to Gentoo?
Sven
--
Sven Wegener
Gentoo Developer
http://www.gentoo.org/
pgp9UtaGwrBIx.pgp
Description: PGP signature
On Fri, Jul 08, 2005 at 03:07:42PM +0300, Dan Armak wrote:
> On Thursday 07 July 2005 02:40, Sven Wegener wrote:
> > For the ebuild part the plan is to remove the automatic RDEPEND=DEPEND
> > setting from portage.
> What's the timeline for this? Are we talking about
22 matches
Mail list logo
