ld remove the useless restrictions on filing bump requests and
welcome users to open bugs. Closing (valid) bugs feels good and is also sort
of a psychological reward for the user who opened the bug, perhaps
encouraging them to stay in direct contact with Gentoo and contribute other,
less trivial wo
ainer.
Do you see any problem with this?
--
Torsten Rehn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Gentoo AMD64 Arch Tester
http://scel.info
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
active ones at amd64) would really appreciate this change.
Discuss.
Also notice bug 213514 [2] for actual progress on this.
[1]
http://archives.gentoo.org/gentoo-dev/msg_a5495659df35010ae44c266dd785ae4e.xml
[2] http://bugs.gentoo.org/213514
--
Torsten Rehn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Gentoo AMD64 Arc
;d suggest seeing that project as a
long term experiment starting with SoC, that may eventually produce something
that satisfies most of the developer staff.
[1] http://scel.info/blog/posts/google-soc-proposal/
--
Torsten Rehn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Gentoo AMD64 Arch Tester
http://scel.info
sig
eprecated by the new_eclasses.
Having multiple eclasses deprecated by multiple eclasses may not be that
common, but this kind of syntax allows for some grouping of related eclasses
being replaced together.
--
Torsten Rehn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Gentoo AMD64 Arch Tester
http://scel.info
s
> "I wish to see a package in Gentoo "
Again, all the most important software is already in the tree, if you need
something else, filing a bug is not too much effort.
--
Torsten Rehn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Gentoo AMD64 Arch Tester
http://scel.info
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
ntoo-dev-help irc channel. Please note that this list is intended to be
used for discussion of Gentoo development, not ebuild development.
[1] http://www.gentoo.org/proj/en/devrel/handbook/handbook.xml?part=2&chap=1
[2] http://www.gentoo.org/doc/en/ebuild-submit.xml
--
Torsten Rehn <[
command are just evaluated and passed to the command in question and cannot
be "protected" anymore by bash. AFAIK.
--
Torsten Rehn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Gentoo AMD64 Arch Tester
http://scel.info
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
to
be quoted when assigning its value to another variable (${S}) by reference.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] > cat test.sh
#!/bin/bash
TEXT="A B"
Q=${TEXT}
echo ${TEXT}
FAIL=DONT TRYTHISATHOME
[EMAIL PROTECTED] > ./test.sh
A B
./test.sh: line 5: TRYTHISATHOME: command not found
--
Torsten
On Wednesday 14 November 2007, Mike Doty wrote:
> S=${WORKDIR}
Shouldn't ${WORKDIR} be quoted here, too?
Kind regards
--
Torsten Rehn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Gentoo AMD64 Arch Tester
http://scel.info
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
On Friday 06 July 2007 19:56, Harald van Dijk wrote:
> And what if they decide they don't accept the license on the first run?
> They'll already have installed the software, which requires acceptance
> of the license.
No violation here: "[...] IF YOU DO NOT AGREE TO THE TERMS OF THIS
AGREEMENT, PRO
11 matches
Mail list logo
