ipped to learn. :p
>
> Hence, the suggestion includes both.
>
> - Solve the immediate issue.
> - Include information to solving the issue in future.
And he would probably still mail the whole list the next time, because
it is easier for him than refering to the instructions he got last time.
--
Tuomo Hartikainen
ortunity?
>
>
> Surely there is a wider audience that will see some packages they like
> are going away because there are not enough maintainers, and thus
> respond by 'stepping up' to maintain a few packages?
I would think those who are interested in (and capable of) maintaining
packages would already be subscribed to gentoo-dev.
--
Tuomo Hartikainen
o was left wondering, what would be the role of the gentoo-dev after
the proposed change. If it is agreed that gentoo-dev has become unusable
for development work and the discussion is moved elsewhere, what would
be the intended purpose of the current list?
--
Tuomo Hartikainen
