On 2021-08-16 18:31, Andreas Sturmlechner wrote:
Feel free to pick up task no. 3 from the bug. Everything else is either done
already or easy enough.
OK, I'll see what I can do.
--
Marecki
OpenPGP_signature
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
On Montag, 16. August 2021 19:06:28 CEST Joonas Niilola wrote:
> On 16.8.2021 19.53, Marek Szuba wrote:
> > On 2021-08-16 17:49, Sam James wrote:
> >> See https://bugs.gentoo.org/802786 and
> >> https://github.com/gentoo/kde/pull/903. There's some work to be done
> >> first.
> >
> > I see. Guess w
On Montag, 16. August 2021 18:53:42 CEST Marek Szuba wrote:
> On 2021-08-16 17:49, Sam James wrote:
> > See https://bugs.gentoo.org/802786 and
> > https://github.com/gentoo/kde/pull/903. There's some work to be done
> > first.
> I see. Guess we'll have to stick with EAPI 7 for cmake revdeps in the
On 2021-08-16 18:06, Joonas Niilola wrote:
What's the rush with 8 anyway? We still have eclasses that don't even
support 7. And since 6 is now, sigh, deprecated, any bump to ebuilds
depending on those eclasses will add to the evergrowing CI issue list
right? I'd say it's more important to secure
On 16.8.2021 19.53, Marek Szuba wrote:
> On 2021-08-16 17:49, Sam James wrote:
>
>> See https://bugs.gentoo.org/802786 and
>> https://github.com/gentoo/kde/pull/903. There's some work to be done
>> first.
>
> I see. Guess we'll have to stick with EAPI 7 for cmake revdeps in the
> foreseeable futu
On 2021-08-16 17:49, Sam James wrote:
See https://bugs.gentoo.org/802786 and https://github.com/gentoo/kde/pull/903.
There's some work to be done first.
I see. Guess we'll have to stick with EAPI 7 for cmake revdeps in the
foreseeable future, then.
--
MS
OpenPGP_signature
Description: O
See https://bugs.gentoo.org/802786 and https://github.com/gentoo/kde/pull/903.
There's some work to be done first.
> On 16 Aug 2021, at 17:43, Marek Szuba wrote:
>
> Signed-off-by: Marek Szuba
> ---
> eclass/cmake.eclass | 4 ++--
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --gi
A word of explanation seeing as I forgot to use --compose to annotate
the patch itself. Looks like Project KDE has got their hands full with,
well, KDE, therefore here's my take on bumping EAPI support in
cmake.eclass. I am not a maintainer of this eclass so I've only made the
smallest possible
Signed-off-by: Marek Szuba
---
eclass/cmake.eclass | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/eclass/cmake.eclass b/eclass/cmake.eclass
index 4bd09459ea6..52bf65a463d 100644
--- a/eclass/cmake.eclass
+++ b/eclass/cmake.eclass
@@ -9,7 +9,7 @@
# Maciej Mrozowski
# (u