On Sat, May 14, 2016 at 5:35 PM, Göktürk Yüksek wrote:
> Mike Gilbert:
>> The current description of ROOT makes no sense and just confuses
>> people. The new description is paraphrased from PMS. ---
>> ebuild-writing/variables/text.xml | 5 +++-- 1 file changed, 3
>>
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Mike Gilbert:
> The current description of ROOT makes no sense and just confuses
> people. The new description is paraphrased from PMS. ---
> ebuild-writing/variables/text.xml | 5 +++-- 1 file changed, 3
> insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff
On Tue, 10 May 2016 22:40:39 -0400
Mike Gilbert wrote:
> On Tue, May 10, 2016 at 9:54 PM, Brian Dolbec
> wrote:
> >> I agree, repoman should be catching this stuff.
> >>
> >
> > Then Please contribute some test ebuilds for the gen-b0rk repo to
> > test
On Tue, May 10, 2016 at 9:54 PM, Brian Dolbec wrote:
>> I agree, repoman should be catching this stuff.
>>
>
> Then Please contribute some test ebuilds for the gen-b0rk repo to test
> repoman or any other Q/A apps with. If they fail to detect the test
> ebuilds, it will give
On Tue, May 10, 2016 at 10:19 PM, Mike Gilbert wrote:
> On Tue, May 10, 2016 at 9:42 PM, Mike Gilbert wrote:
>>> Anywhere that you need addpredict() it also seems reasonable. The
>>> v4l-dvb-saa716x ebuilds use "${ROOT}/usr/src/linux/" where EPREFIX would
On Tue, May 10, 2016 at 9:42 PM, Mike Gilbert wrote:
>> Anywhere that you need addpredict() it also seems reasonable. The
>> v4l-dvb-saa716x ebuilds use "${ROOT}/usr/src/linux/" where EPREFIX would
>> not be a good replacement.
>
> Nah, usually addpredict is dealing with stuff
On Tue, 10 May 2016 21:42:19 -0400
Mike Gilbert wrote:
> On Tue, May 10, 2016 at 5:25 PM, Michael Orlitzky
> wrote:
> > On 05/10/2016 02:28 PM, Mike Gilbert wrote:
> >> On Tue, May 10, 2016 at 11:08 AM, Michael Orlitzky
> >> wrote:
>
On Tue, May 10, 2016 at 5:25 PM, Michael Orlitzky wrote:
> On 05/10/2016 02:28 PM, Mike Gilbert wrote:
>> On Tue, May 10, 2016 at 11:08 AM, Michael Orlitzky wrote:
>>> We have maybe 150 ebuilds in the tree using $ROOT in src_* functions.
>>> Some are bugs, but
On 10/05/16 05:25 PM, Michael Orlitzky wrote:
> * dmraid does
>
> einfo "Appending pkg.m4 from system to aclocal.m4"
> cat "${ROOT}"/usr/share/aclocal/pkg.m4 >>"${S}"/aclocal.m4 || \
> die "Could not append pkg.m4
I'm pretty sure dmraid was me, and that code likely predates
On 05/10/2016 02:28 PM, Mike Gilbert wrote:
> On Tue, May 10, 2016 at 11:08 AM, Michael Orlitzky wrote:
>> We have maybe 150 ebuilds in the tree using $ROOT in src_* functions.
>> Some are bugs, but many look OK to me. Do we really want to say "never"
>> do that?
>
> According
On Tue, 10 May 2016 14:28:46 -0400
Mike Gilbert wrote:
> On Tue, May 10, 2016 at 11:08 AM, Michael Orlitzky
> wrote:
> > We have maybe 150 ebuilds in the tree using $ROOT in src_*
> > functions. Some are bugs, but many look OK to me. Do we really want
> > to
On Tue, May 10, 2016 at 11:08 AM, Michael Orlitzky wrote:
> We have maybe 150 ebuilds in the tree using $ROOT in src_* functions.
> Some are bugs, but many look OK to me. Do we really want to say "never"
> do that?
According to PMS, it is only legal in pkg functions.
Can you
On 10/05/16 16:08, Michael Orlitzky wrote:
> On 05/08/2016 01:42 PM, Mike Gilbert wrote:
>> The current description of ROOT makes no sense and just confuses people.
>> The new description is paraphrased from PMS.
> The current version is bad, but the PMS version isn't great either.
>
> We really
On 05/08/2016 01:42 PM, Mike Gilbert wrote:
> The current description of ROOT makes no sense and just confuses people.
> The new description is paraphrased from PMS.
The current version is bad, but the PMS version isn't great either.
We really need examples for D, ROOT, ED, EROOT, and EPREFIX.
The current description of ROOT makes no sense and just confuses people.
The new description is paraphrased from PMS.
---
ebuild-writing/variables/text.xml | 5 +++--
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/ebuild-writing/variables/text.xml
15 matches
Mail list logo