Re: [gentoo-dev] [PATCH 1/2] prefix.eclass: don't redundantly define EPREFIX as an eclass variable

Sam James writes: > Since EAPI 3, EPREFIX has been defined via PMS. Having this as an > "eclass variable" in docs is confusing as it implies one needs > prefix.eclass to provide it. > > Drop it given it adds nothing and causes confusion. > > Reported-by: Aaron W. Swenson > Signed-off-by: Sam

[gentoo-dev] [PATCH 1/2] prefix.eclass: don't redundantly define EPREFIX as an eclass variable

Since EAPI 3, EPREFIX has been defined via PMS. Having this as an "eclass variable" in docs is confusing as it implies one needs prefix.eclass to provide it. Drop it given it adds nothing and causes confusion. Reported-by: Aaron W. Swenson Signed-off-by: Sam James --- eclass/prefix.eclass |