[gentoo-dev] [PATCH 7/9] multilib-build.eclass: Enable EAPI 6

2015-12-06 Thread Michał Górny
--- eclass/multilib-build.eclass | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/eclass/multilib-build.eclass b/eclass/multilib-build.eclass index eb7bf9a..e9e5604 100644 --- a/eclass/multilib-build.eclass +++ b/eclass/multilib-build.eclass @@ -21,7 +21,7 @@ if [[ !

Re: [gentoo-dev] [PATCH 7/9] multilib-build.eclass: Enable EAPI 6

2015-12-06 Thread Ulrich Mueller
> On Sun, 6 Dec 2015, Michał Górny wrote: > # EAPI=4 is required for meaningful MULTILIB_USEDEP. > case ${EAPI:-0} in > - 4|5) ;; > + [456]) ;; > *) die "EAPI=${EAPI} is not supported" ;; > esac Why not write this as 4|5|6) for better readability? It's not even shorter with

Re: [gentoo-dev] [PATCH 7/9] multilib-build.eclass: Enable EAPI 6

2015-12-06 Thread James Le Cuirot
On Sun, 6 Dec 2015 22:32:30 +0100 Ulrich Mueller wrote: > > On Sun, 6 Dec 2015, Michał Górny wrote: > > > # EAPI=4 is required for meaningful MULTILIB_USEDEP. > > case ${EAPI:-0} in > > - 4|5) ;; > > + [456]) ;; > > *) die "EAPI=${EAPI} is not supported" ;; > >

Re: [gentoo-dev] [PATCH 7/9] multilib-build.eclass: Enable EAPI 6

2015-12-06 Thread Ulrich Mueller
> On Sun, 6 Dec 2015, James Le Cuirot wrote: >> > # EAPI=4 is required for meaningful MULTILIB_USEDEP. >> > case ${EAPI:-0} in >> > - 4|5) ;; >> > + [456]) ;; >> >*) die "EAPI=${EAPI} is not supported" ;; >> > esac >> >> Why not write this as 4|5|6) for better readability? It's not