On Wed, 14 Sep 2011 17:32:37 -0700
Brian Harring wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 15, 2011 at 12:15:59AM +0100, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
> > On Wed, 14 Sep 2011 11:19:35 -0400
> > Mike Frysinger wrote:
> > > however, why wont this work sanely in src_* or pkg_* funcs ? the
> > > env there is the one construct
On Wednesday, September 14, 2011 19:15:59 Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
> On Wed, 14 Sep 2011 11:19:35 -0400 Mike Frysinger wrote:
> > however, why wont this work sanely in src_* or pkg_* funcs ? the env
> > there is the one constructed by the PM which includes the merged IUSE
> > values.
>
> It's not.
On Thu, Sep 15, 2011 at 12:15:59AM +0100, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
> On Wed, 14 Sep 2011 11:19:35 -0400
> Mike Frysinger wrote:
> > however, why wont this work sanely in src_* or pkg_* funcs ? the env
> > there is the one constructed by the PM which includes the merged IUSE
> > values.
>
> It's no
On Wed, 14 Sep 2011 11:19:35 -0400
Mike Frysinger wrote:
> however, why wont this work sanely in src_* or pkg_* funcs ? the env
> there is the one constructed by the PM which includes the merged IUSE
> values.
It's not. We deliberately don't specify that the PM passes fixed up
values for IUSE, D
On Wed, Sep 14, 2011 at 01:18, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
> On Tue, 13 Sep 2011 10:29:48 -0400 Mike Frysinger wrote:
>> > You don't do it by checking IUSE. You do it by having the ebuild
>> > define a variable like WANT_MONKEY_SUPPORT.
>>
>> it's a crap shoot. as long as Michał's proposed func doesnt
On Tue, 13 Sep 2011 10:29:48 -0400
Mike Frysinger wrote:
> > You don't do it by checking IUSE. You do it by having the ebuild
> > define a variable like WANT_MONKEY_SUPPORT.
>
> it's a crap shoot. as long as Michał's proposed func doesnt attempt
> to make guarantees that don't exist now, i think
On Tuesday, September 13, 2011 06:46:33 Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
> On Tue, 13 Sep 2011 12:50:30 +0200 Michał Górny wrote:
> > > Are you sure this is defined behaviour? IUSE is a fancy merged
> > > variable for eclasses, and I don't think we guarantee that the value
> > > visible to the ebuild at any
On 06:39 Tue 13 Sep , Joshua Kinard wrote:
> On 09/13/2011 06:29, Michał Górny wrote:
>
> > On Tue, 13 Sep 2011 12:21:31 +0200
> > Michał Górny wrote:
> >
> >> +# @FUNCTION: has_iuse
> >
> > Ideas for a better name will be appreciated.
>
>
> 'in_iuse' or 'iuse_contains'?
I'd prefer to ke
On 09/13/2011 06:46, Michał Górny wrote:
> Guess just a typo but for the record:
No, just a Portal joke :)
--
Joshua Kinard
Gentoo/MIPS
ku...@gentoo.org
4096R/D25D95E3 2011-03-28
"The past tempts us, the present confuses us, the future frightens us. And
our lives slip away, moment by moment,
On Tue, 13 Sep 2011 12:50:30 +0200
Michał Górny wrote:
> > Are you sure this is defined behaviour? IUSE is a fancy merged
> > variable for eclasses, and I don't think we guarantee that the value
> > visible to the ebuild at any particular point is the generated value
> > used by the package mangle
On Tue, 13 Sep 2011 11:32:40 +0100
Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
> On Tue, 13 Sep 2011 12:21:31 +0200
> Michał Górny wrote:
> > Such checks are used at least in autotools-utils & kde* eclasses,
> > and are done wrong there. Thus, I've created a little reusable
> > snippet suitable for eutils.
>
> Are
On Tue, 13 Sep 2011 06:39:13 -0400
Joshua Kinard wrote:
> On 09/13/2011 06:29, Michał Górny wrote:
>
> > On Tue, 13 Sep 2011 12:21:31 +0200
> > Michał Górny wrote:
> >
> >> +# @FUNCTION: has_iuse
> >
> > Ideas for a better name will be appreciated.
>
>
> 'in_iuse' or 'iuse_contains'?
>
> i
On 09/13/2011 06:29, Michał Górny wrote:
> On Tue, 13 Sep 2011 12:21:31 +0200
> Michał Górny wrote:
>
>> +# @FUNCTION: has_iuse
>
> Ideas for a better name will be appreciated.
'in_iuse' or 'iuse_contains'?
if $(in_iuse foobar); do
$(cake)
fi
or
if $(iuse_contains foobar); do
On Tue, 13 Sep 2011 12:21:31 +0200
Michał Górny wrote:
> Such checks are used at least in autotools-utils & kde* eclasses, and
> are done wrong there. Thus, I've created a little reusable snippet
> suitable for eutils.
Are you sure this is defined behaviour? IUSE is a fancy merged variable
for ec
On Tue, 13 Sep 2011 12:21:31 +0200
Michał Górny wrote:
> +# @FUNCTION: has_iuse
Ideas for a better name will be appreciated.
> +# @USAGE: flag
Ah, this should've been ''; fixed already.
--
Best regards,
Michał Górny
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
Such checks are used at least in autotools-utils & kde* eclasses, and
are done wrong there. Thus, I've created a little reusable snippet
suitable for eutils.
---
eclass/eutils.eclass | 15 +++
1 files changed, 15 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
diff --git a/eclass/eutils.eclass b/ecla
16 matches
Mail list logo
