On 23/04/2022 14.22, Ulrich Mueller wrote:
>> On Sat, 23 Apr 2022, Arthur Zamarin wrote:
>
>> ...
>
> That's not entirely fool-proof. Sometimes a maintainer's description
> suggests that they shouldn't be CCed. (Maybe we need an additional tag
> for this to make it machine readable?)
I'm
> On Sat, 23 Apr 2022, Arthur Zamarin wrote:
> The first flow I want to introduce is when nattka sees a bug with
> CC-ARCHES in keyword, but not all maintainers were CC, nattka will CC
> all maintainers, drop the CC-ARCHES, and comment something a long the
> lines "wait for maintainers to ACK
Hi All!
As a result of a premature stabilization CC-ARCHES without
acknowledgments from maintainers on a bug in last week, and after leio
suggested on IRC a change of flows, I want to suggest multiple ideas and
get your responses and comments.
As some background, we have a tool called nattka
