On Wednesday 25 February 2009 23:45:41 Mike Frysinger wrote:
cut
i recall it being incorrect in some cases (it checked for what dash
supports, not what POSIX supports), but that was a while ago, so maybe my
experience is dated at this point. otherwise, integrating it sounds sane
to me, and if
On Thursday 26 February 2009 04:27:44 Timothy Redaelli wrote:
On Wednesday 25 February 2009 23:45:41 Mike Frysinger wrote:
i recall it being incorrect in some cases (it checked for what dash
supports, not what POSIX supports), but that was a while ago, so maybe my
experience is dated at
On Thursday 26 February 2009 06:33:17 Timothy Redaelli wrote:
On Thursday 26 February 2009 10:32:52 you wrote:
i'm totally not following. we were talking about POSIX shell syntax, but
now you're talking about utilities as well ?
I'm talking about checkbashism.pl checks and btw type is a
Hi,
what do you think about checking for bashism on install_qa_check?
Obviously only for scripts with #!/bin/sh and #!/sbin/runscript as first line.
I think checkbashisms.pl [1] could be a good start point.
[1] http://svn.debian.org/viewsvn/devscripts/trunk/scripts/checkbashisms.pl
--
Timothy
On Wednesday 25 February 2009 11:10:01 Timothy Redaelli wrote:
what do you think about checking for bashism on install_qa_check?
Obviously only for scripts with #!/bin/sh and #!/sbin/runscript as first
line.
I think checkbashisms.pl [1] could be a good start point.
[1]
