On Thursday 10 November 2011 19:09:28 Luca Barbato wrote:
> On 11/5/11 1:58 AM, Kacper Kowalik wrote:
> > I'd like to ask that we enable verbose building by default. I have
> > cmake-utils.eclass in mind, because it's dead easy there, but there's a
> > lot of packages that support things like "make
On 11/5/11 1:58 AM, Kacper Kowalik wrote:
Hi,
I'd like to ask that we enable verbose building by default. I have
cmake-utils.eclass in mind, because it's dead easy there, but there's a
lot of packages that support things like "make V=1" or "make VERBOSE=1" too.
I've seen too many bugs reports to
On 11/05/11 21:00, Maciej Mrozowski wrote:
> On Saturday 05 of November 2011 09:58:00 Kacper Kowalik wrote:
>> Hi,
>> I'd like to ask that we enable verbose building by default. I have
>> cmake-utils.eclass in mind, because it's dead easy there, but there's a
>> lot of packages that support things
On Saturday 05 of November 2011 09:58:00 Kacper Kowalik wrote:
> Hi,
> I'd like to ask that we enable verbose building by default. I have
> cmake-utils.eclass in mind, because it's dead easy there, but there's a
> lot of packages that support things like "make V=1" or "make VERBOSE=1"
> too.
>
> I
W dniu 05.11.2011 18:04, Michał Górny pisze:
> On Sat, 5 Nov 2011 12:05:15 +0100
> Ulrich Mueller wrote:
>
>>> On Sat, 05 Nov 2011, Kacper Kowalik wrote:
>>
>>> I'd like to ask that we enable verbose building by default. I have
>>> cmake-utils.eclass in mind, because it's dead easy there, but
On Sat, 5 Nov 2011 12:05:15 +0100
Ulrich Mueller wrote:
> > On Sat, 05 Nov 2011, Kacper Kowalik wrote:
>
> > I'd like to ask that we enable verbose building by default. I have
> > cmake-utils.eclass in mind, because it's dead easy there, but
> > there's a lot of packages that support things
El sáb, 05-11-2011 a las 09:58 +0100, Kacper Kowalik escribió:
> Hi,
> I'd like to ask that we enable verbose building by default. I have
> cmake-utils.eclass in mind, because it's dead easy there, but there's a
> lot of packages that support things like "make V=1" or "make VERBOSE=1" too.
>
> I'v
> On Sat, 05 Nov 2011, Kacper Kowalik wrote:
> I'd like to ask that we enable verbose building by default. I have
> cmake-utils.eclass in mind, because it's dead easy there, but
> there's a lot of packages that support things like "make V=1" or
> "make VERBOSE=1" too.
> I've seen too many bug
On Sat, Nov 5, 2011 at 11:27 AM, Nirbheek Chauhan wrote:
>
> Is there a way to output the verbose log to build.log, but show the
> shortened log to the terminal? The non-verbose build is quite useful
> for seeing the actual warnings as they fly by rather than the entire
> gcc/libtool command, whic
On Sat, Nov 5, 2011 at 2:28 PM, Kacper Kowalik wrote:
> Hi,
> I'd like to ask that we enable verbose building by default. I have
> cmake-utils.eclass in mind, because it's dead easy there, but there's a
> lot of packages that support things like "make V=1" or "make VERBOSE=1" too.
>
> I've seen to
On 05-11-2011 09:58:00 +0100, Kacper Kowalik wrote:
> Hi,
> I'd like to ask that we enable verbose building by default. I have
> cmake-utils.eclass in mind, because it's dead easy there, but there's a
> lot of packages that support things like "make V=1" or "make VERBOSE=1" too.
>
> I've seen too
Hi,
I'd like to ask that we enable verbose building by default. I have
cmake-utils.eclass in mind, because it's dead easy there, but there's a
lot of packages that support things like "make V=1" or "make VERBOSE=1" too.
I've seen too many bugs reports today that gave me cute, colorful
build.logs a
12 matches
Mail list logo
