Hello, will send this to gentoo-dev mailing list per Zac's suggestion ;):
Probably Zac already remembers my suggestion of:
https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=413619
Sorry for insisting a bit on it but this issue bites me periodically.
Months ago, I was able to administrate myself some of my
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 06/04/2012 05:26 PM, Pacho Ramos wrote:
> Hello, will send this to gentoo-dev mailing list per Zac's
> suggestion ;):
>
> ...They usually do a good job maintaining them, the only issue I
> see they hit from time to time is forgetting to run JUST
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Tue, 05 Jun 2012 08:44:08 -0400
"Aaron W. Swenson" wrote:
> "There's never anything important in all that text." - Anonymous
> Gentoo User
To be fair, most einfo and elog messages are useless spam. When elog
was introduced, it was supposed to be o
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 06/05/2012 02:44 PM, Aaron W. Swenson wrote:
> "There's never anything important in all that text." - Anonymous
> Gentoo User
The bad part is, that even reading of these messages can result in a
breakage. I update a bunch of machines with these
On 06/05/2012 05:51 PM, Michael Weber wrote:
> Is there any chance to detect this ZLIB_VERSION problem with
> revdep-rebuild (worst case: add a list of possibly broken packages
> with tests)?
I'd suggest a special ebuild phase to check for ABI changes, like the
pre_pkg_preinst_abi_check phase sugg
El mié, 06-06-2012 a las 02:51 +0200, Michael Weber escribió:
[...]
>
> [1] if you forget the -X on module-rebuild, you might no longer have
> the virtualbox-modules version installed in the tree (no packages
> satisfy ...). virtualbox does remove old versions real quick.
>
> The fun part comes w
El mar, 05-06-2012 a las 19:18 -0700, Zac Medico escribió:
> On 06/05/2012 05:51 PM, Michael Weber wrote:
> > Is there any chance to detect this ZLIB_VERSION problem with
> > revdep-rebuild (worst case: add a list of possibly broken packages
> > with tests)?
>
> I'd suggest a special ebuild phase
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 06/06/2012 01:46 AM, Pacho Ramos wrote:
> El mar, 05-06-2012 a las 19:18 -0700, Zac Medico escribió:
>> On 06/05/2012 05:51 PM, Michael Weber wrote:
>>> Is there any chance to detect this ZLIB_VERSION problem with
>>> revdep-rebuild (worst case: ad
On Tue, Jun 05, 2012 at 07:18:01PM -0700, Zac Medico wrote:
> On 06/05/2012 05:51 PM, Michael Weber wrote:
> > Is there any chance to detect this ZLIB_VERSION problem with
> > revdep-rebuild (worst case: add a list of possibly broken packages
> > with tests)?
>
> I'd suggest a special ebuild phase
On 06/06/2012 02:59 PM, Brian Harring wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 05, 2012 at 07:18:01PM -0700, Zac Medico wrote:
>> On 06/05/2012 05:51 PM, Michael Weber wrote:
>>> Is there any chance to detect this ZLIB_VERSION problem with
>>> revdep-rebuild (worst case: add a list of possibly broken packages
>>> with
Replying to this email since it seems to be the discussion behind
the "sub-slot" feature proposed for EAPI 5.
On 04-06-2012 23:26:18 +0200, Pacho Ramos wrote:
> This is why I think we should try to push a bit my first suggestion for
> the short term until "the perfect one" is ready as, until then,
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 06/09/12 05:01 AM, Fabian Groffen wrote:
> Replying to this email since it seems to be the discussion behind
> the "sub-slot" feature proposed for EAPI 5.
>
> On 04-06-2012 23:26:18 +0200, Pacho Ramos wrote:
>> This is why I think we should try
On 09/06/2012 02:01 AM, Fabian Groffen wrote:
> After reading this thread, I have seen numerous occasions where has been
> asked what this proposal actually solves. Unless I've accidentially
> skipped over it, the answer has yet to be given. It appears to me now
> sub-slot is a feature that makes
On 06-09-2012 09:25:53 -0400, Ian Stakenvicius wrote:
> #1 - there is both a specification, and an initial implementation, AND
> a fork of the tree that is kept semi-up-to-date on my dev overlay.
I was interested in a (formal) specification, not a proof of concept.
> #2 - related to your question
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 07/09/12 01:13 PM, Fabian Groffen wrote:
> On 06-09-2012 09:25:53 -0400, Ian Stakenvicius wrote:
>> #1 - there is both a specification, and an initial
>> implementation, AND a fork of the tree that is kept
>> semi-up-to-date on my dev overlay.
>
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 09/07/2012 10:13 AM, Fabian Groffen wrote:
> Could you give an example where implicit ${PV} as sub-slot would
> not do what you need?
Can you point out a package for which SONAME/ABI/whatever changes
every time ${PV} changes? Probably not. Is the r
On 07-09-2012 10:52:10 -0700, Zac Medico wrote:
> On 09/07/2012 10:13 AM, Fabian Groffen wrote:
> > Could you give an example where implicit ${PV} as sub-slot would
> > not do what you need?
>
> Can you point out a package for which SONAME/ABI/whatever changes
> every time ${PV} changes? Probably
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 06/09/12 09:25 AM, Ian Stakenvicius wrote:
>
> sub-slots is the 'some-identifier' part of
> ${SLOT}/${some-identifier}. It doesn't have to *replate* to ${PV}
> at all, and generally shouldn't.
>
>
..i have no idea what "replate" was supposed t
18 matches
Mail list logo
