On 06-09-2012 09:25:53 -0400, Ian Stakenvicius wrote:
#1 - there is both a specification, and an initial implementation, AND
a fork of the tree that is kept semi-up-to-date on my dev overlay.
I was interested in a (formal) specification, not a proof of concept.
#2 - related to your question
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 07/09/12 01:13 PM, Fabian Groffen wrote:
On 06-09-2012 09:25:53 -0400, Ian Stakenvicius wrote:
#1 - there is both a specification, and an initial
implementation, AND a fork of the tree that is kept
semi-up-to-date on my dev overlay.
I was
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 09/07/2012 10:13 AM, Fabian Groffen wrote:
Could you give an example where implicit ${PV} as sub-slot would
not do what you need?
Can you point out a package for which SONAME/ABI/whatever changes
every time ${PV} changes? Probably not. Is the
On 07-09-2012 10:52:10 -0700, Zac Medico wrote:
On 09/07/2012 10:13 AM, Fabian Groffen wrote:
Could you give an example where implicit ${PV} as sub-slot would
not do what you need?
Can you point out a package for which SONAME/ABI/whatever changes
every time ${PV} changes? Probably not. Is
Replying to this email since it seems to be the discussion behind
the sub-slot feature proposed for EAPI 5.
On 04-06-2012 23:26:18 +0200, Pacho Ramos wrote:
This is why I think we should try to push a bit my first suggestion for
the short term until the perfect one is ready as, until then, we
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 06/09/12 05:01 AM, Fabian Groffen wrote:
Replying to this email since it seems to be the discussion behind
the sub-slot feature proposed for EAPI 5.
On 04-06-2012 23:26:18 +0200, Pacho Ramos wrote:
This is why I think we should try to push
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 06/09/12 09:25 AM, Ian Stakenvicius wrote:
sub-slots is the 'some-identifier' part of
${SLOT}/${some-identifier}. It doesn't have to *replate* to ${PV}
at all, and generally shouldn't.
..i have no idea what replate was supposed to be.
On 09/06/2012 02:01 AM, Fabian Groffen wrote:
After reading this thread, I have seen numerous occasions where has been
asked what this proposal actually solves. Unless I've accidentially
skipped over it, the answer has yet to be given. It appears to me now
sub-slot is a feature that makes it
El mié, 06-06-2012 a las 02:51 +0200, Michael Weber escribió:
[...]
[1] if you forget the -X on module-rebuild, you might no longer have
the virtualbox-modules version installed in the tree (no packages
satisfy ...). virtualbox does remove old versions real quick.
The fun part comes with
El mar, 05-06-2012 a las 19:18 -0700, Zac Medico escribió:
On 06/05/2012 05:51 PM, Michael Weber wrote:
Is there any chance to detect this ZLIB_VERSION problem with
revdep-rebuild (worst case: add a list of possibly broken packages
with tests)?
I'd suggest a special ebuild phase to check
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 06/06/2012 01:46 AM, Pacho Ramos wrote:
El mar, 05-06-2012 a las 19:18 -0700, Zac Medico escribió:
On 06/05/2012 05:51 PM, Michael Weber wrote:
Is there any chance to detect this ZLIB_VERSION problem with
revdep-rebuild (worst case: add a list
On Tue, Jun 05, 2012 at 07:18:01PM -0700, Zac Medico wrote:
On 06/05/2012 05:51 PM, Michael Weber wrote:
Is there any chance to detect this ZLIB_VERSION problem with
revdep-rebuild (worst case: add a list of possibly broken packages
with tests)?
I'd suggest a special ebuild phase to
On 06/06/2012 02:59 PM, Brian Harring wrote:
On Tue, Jun 05, 2012 at 07:18:01PM -0700, Zac Medico wrote:
On 06/05/2012 05:51 PM, Michael Weber wrote:
Is there any chance to detect this ZLIB_VERSION problem with
revdep-rebuild (worst case: add a list of possibly broken packages
with tests)?
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 06/04/2012 05:26 PM, Pacho Ramos wrote:
Hello, will send this to gentoo-dev mailing list per Zac's
suggestion ;):
...They usually do a good job maintaining them, the only issue I
see they hit from time to time is forgetting to run JUST
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Tue, 05 Jun 2012 08:44:08 -0400
Aaron W. Swenson titanof...@gentoo.org wrote:
There's never anything important in all that text. - Anonymous
Gentoo User
To be fair, most einfo and elog messages are useless spam. When elog
was introduced, it was
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 06/05/2012 02:44 PM, Aaron W. Swenson wrote:
There's never anything important in all that text. - Anonymous
Gentoo User
The bad part is, that even reading of these messages can result in a
breakage. I update a bunch of machines with these
On 06/05/2012 05:51 PM, Michael Weber wrote:
Is there any chance to detect this ZLIB_VERSION problem with
revdep-rebuild (worst case: add a list of possibly broken packages
with tests)?
I'd suggest a special ebuild phase to check for ABI changes, like the
pre_pkg_preinst_abi_check phase
Hello, will send this to gentoo-dev mailing list per Zac's suggestion ;):
Probably Zac already remembers my suggestion of:
https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=413619
Sorry for insisting a bit on it but this issue bites me periodically.
Months ago, I was able to administrate myself some of
18 matches
Mail list logo
