Re: [gentoo-dev] [rfc] Sane defaults for USE_PYTHON, patch to python eclass

2010-12-06 Thread Thomas Sachau
Am 04.12.2010 21:23, schrieb Sebastian Pipping: > On 12/04/10 16:38, Thomas Sachau wrote: >>> Proposed new situation >>> == >>> If I have a version of Python installed, it should be usable well. >>> So USE_PYTHON is derived from the list of all available Python slots. >>> Exclud

Re: [gentoo-dev] [rfc] Sane defaults for USE_PYTHON, patch to python eclass

2010-12-04 Thread Sebastian Pipping
On 12/04/10 16:38, Thomas Sachau wrote: > I think, the complete python code, behaviour and eclass is way too > complicated to easily manage or > even understand it. E.g. why do we need 2 active versions by default? If i > set e.g. python-2.6 as > default, i want everything to be installed for tha

Re: [gentoo-dev] [rfc] Sane defaults for USE_PYTHON, patch to python eclass

2010-12-04 Thread Thomas Sachau
Am 04.12.2010 01:23, schrieb Sebastian Pipping: > Hello! > > > Current situation > = > Without specifying USE_PYTHON in /etc/make.conf ebuilds based on the > python eclass will install packages for no more ABIs than the two active > versions on the 2.x and 3.x lines. To give an e

[gentoo-dev] [rfc] Sane defaults for USE_PYTHON, patch to python eclass

2010-12-03 Thread Sebastian Pipping
Hello! Current situation = Without specifying USE_PYTHON in /etc/make.conf ebuilds based on the python eclass will install packages for no more ABIs than the two active versions on the 2.x and 3.x lines. To give an example: with Python 2.6, 2.7 and 3.1 installed and 2.7 set as th