Le samedi 05 juillet 2008 à 10:01 +0200, Rémi Cardona a écrit :
The Gnome Team has 3 herds : gnome, gnome-mm and gnome-office. While
officially we (us gnomies) are all maintainers of all 3 herds, having 3
herds makes for better housekeeping.
you forgot gnome-accessibility :p
--
Gilles
Robin H. Johnson wrote:
On Fri, Jul 04, 2008 at 04:22:02PM +0200, Tiziano M?ller wrote:
One GLEP introduces new elements 'team', 'dev' and 'proxy':
http://dev.gentoo.org/~dev-zero/glep/glep-new_metadata_elements.html
1. With the addition ofmaintainerteamcpp/team/maintainer, why
do we
Hi everyone
Since people are talking about metadata.xml again I'd like to present two
more GLEPs which will ease the process of auto-assigning bugs on one side
and make it a bit safer on the other side. Both of them are still in draft
state and if someone would like to contribute I'd be really
Tiziano Müller wrote:
What do you think of them?
Both seem good, I'm looking forward to see them completed =)
lu
--
Luca Barbato
Gentoo Council Member
Gentoo/linux Gentoo/PPC
http://dev.gentoo.org/~lu_zero
--
gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org mailing list
Tiziano Müller wrote:
What do you think of them?
+1 on the first GLEP.
The second GLEP seems like a much better way of doing things, so +1 as
well, but I am no xml expert :)
Cheers,
Rémi
--
gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org mailing list
On Fri, Jul 04, 2008 at 04:22:02PM +0200, Tiziano M?ller wrote:
And this is where the second GLEP comes in:
http://dev.gentoo.org/~dev-zero/glep/glep-xsd.html
Don't remove the DTD DOCTYPE line. Leave it there.
Let simple tools be able to use the DTD to validate the well-formedness,
then
On Fri, Jul 04, 2008 at 04:22:02PM +0200, Tiziano M?ller wrote:
One GLEP introduces new elements 'team', 'dev' and 'proxy':
http://dev.gentoo.org/~dev-zero/glep/glep-new_metadata_elements.html
1. With the addition of maintainerteamcpp/team/maintainer, why
do we still need herd elements?
2.
