On Sun, 25 Mar 2007 23:07:03 -0400
Seemant Kulleen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Ciaran has brought attention to a very important thing -- QA seems to
take a backseat to a few things, and it is actually a little
disturbing that it does.
I believe the QA team expect developers to *ask* when they
On Sun, 25 Mar 2007 23:07:03 -0400
Seemant Kulleen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Ciaran has brought attention to a very important thing -- QA seems to
take a backseat to a few things, and it is actually a little
disturbing that it does.
I believe the QA team expect developers to *ask* when they
On Mon, 26 Mar 2007 07:52:25 -0700 (PDT)
Alec Warner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sun, 25 Mar 2007 23:07:03 -0400
Seemant Kulleen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Ciaran has brought attention to a very important thing -- QA seems
to take a backseat to a few things, and it is actually a little
Ciaran McCreesh [EMAIL PROTECTED] napisał:
Some breakages, like this one,
There wasn't any additional breakage. Not working and not compiling package
can't be broken any more.
--
Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar Arahesis
--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
On Mon, 2007-03-26 at 15:38 +0100, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
On Sun, 25 Mar 2007 23:07:03 -0400
Seemant Kulleen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Ciaran has brought attention to a very important thing -- QA seems to
take a backseat to a few things, and it is actually a little
disturbing that it does.
Hi,
virtual/x11 has been deprecated for some time and now that all packages
that only use it have been removed it is time to mask and remove it. I
have put it in package.mask now - please fix your overlays in case you
still use virtual/x11 somewhere. It will be removed in 30 days as per
the
Michael Sterrett -Mr. Bones.- [EMAIL PROTECTED] napisał:
I commented this out of package.mask. x11-libs/fox-1.2.6-r2 still uses it.
Need to fix that up before masking it.
These not numerous packages still using virtual/x11 can be fixed after masking
it. Almost nobody uses them. Masking
On Mon, 26 Mar 2007 03:45:38 +0200
arfrever [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Michael Sterrett -Mr. Bones.- [EMAIL PROTECTED] napisał:
I commented this out of package.mask. x11-libs/fox-1.2.6-r2 still
uses it. Need to fix that up before masking it.
These not numerous packages still using
On Mon, 26 Mar 2007 03:45:38 +0200
arfrever [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Michael Sterrett -Mr. Bones.- [EMAIL PROTECTED] napisaÅ#8218;:
I commented this out of package.mask. x11-libs/fox-1.2.6-r2 still
uses it. Need to fix that up before masking it.
These not numerous packages still using
Alec Warner wrote: [Sun Mar 25 2007, 09:08:01PM CDT]
It's acceptable to me. I'd rather see us make progress than postpone
changes for months while devs bicker about changes to be made. That would
not be the case if say, people had the balls to just fix things in the
tree. However we have
On Mon, 2007-03-26 at 03:21 +0100, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
Well, if it's reached the take drastic action stage (which, let's
face it, it has at this point), why not go and fix the tree? It's a
better solution than breaking it, and anyone who moans now isn't going
to get any sympathy from
11 matches
Mail list logo
